Comments: 26
Like-ICare [2014-08-25 00:52:11 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Recai [2013-07-04 09:22:54 +0000 UTC]
I love it. ♥♥♥♥
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Okavanga [2013-07-04 06:45:20 +0000 UTC]
This is taken with the Canon 100 mm macro lens, Cecily? Very good piece of glass.
Great Stuff
David
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MinervaStar [2013-07-04 05:15:00 +0000 UTC]
wow lovely shot <3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
focalmann [2013-07-03 17:24:16 +0000 UTC]
Fabulous work, Cecily!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The-Dude-L-Bug In reply to CecilyAndreuArtwork [2013-07-05 06:27:47 +0000 UTC]
If the drops are all within a 1mm span, the magnified images will be in good focus.
You can see what I mean in Duggiehoo's "Rained all day" [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
CecilyAndreuArtwork In reply to The-Dude-L-Bug [2013-07-06 11:38:51 +0000 UTC]
I wonder though whether the size of the drops plays a significant role in the focal magnification. My drops were very small on the edge of a tiny leaf, while Doug's drops appear to be large drops along a stem. Because my drops were so small, the different span between them became more pronounced in contrast to Doug's large drops.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The-Dude-L-Bug In reply to CecilyAndreuArtwork [2013-07-06 15:52:50 +0000 UTC]
Yes, the size of the drop does have a significant impact on the "zoom".
According to the principal of behind it, the magnification of the optics is dependent on the size and shape of "lens".
However, to get the effect we're discussing, it's the middle of drops that must be at the proper distances to each other.
So yes, the smaller drops makes the separation between more apparent.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
The-Dude-L-Bug In reply to CecilyAndreuArtwork [2013-07-04 19:16:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks,
and hopeless? NO, not at all!!!
LOL! Those are approximations, but after quite literally hundreds of macro shots, I have a pretty good grasp on how shallow the DOF can be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0