HOME | DD
Cevelt-MikLiak — It's 3D!
by-nd
Published: 2012-03-21 21:33:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 1332; Favourites: 44; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
Okay, stupid artwork is stupid
I always liked artworks with humour, and now that I can draw decently I though to do one
I hate it when I go to the movies to watch a film and I decide to go for the 3D version, and later understand that I paid extra for nothing, because the 3D was crap! I mean what the hell!!!??? Only Avatar had awesome 3D?! If you can't make a 3D movie then DON'T!!!
Okay end of bitching....
Here we have Diego and Zeke watching some random anthro fox with 3D glasses... Don't ask don't tell, how this came to my mind
For the ones that don't know Zeke is another character of mine. For the ones that remember him different, yeah, I changed his style a little
Just to be sure, Diego is not my fursona or anything, he is just like a "mascot" for my dA. He is always feral looking.
OMG..... the pop-corn looks like brainssss....
--
Art © MikLiak-Cevelt
Diego © MikLiak-Cevelt
Zeke © MikLiak-Cevelt
Related content
Comments: 31
haha that actually made me laugh "was this 3d before we put on the glasses?" And I totally agree with you on the whole 3d version crap, Avatar was probably the only one really worth seeing in 3D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
oh I know tell me about it, and you're welcome
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'm convinced movie execs have a hard time figuring out that there is, in fact, a correct way to do stereoscopy, and it's not a matter of what you think looks cool. Upconverting live action action movies to stereo is a sure way to produce a horrible picture.
It's probably not worth even bothering with anymore but... Stereoscopic is the industry term. I mean, Toy Story was one of the first 3D animated films. (We don't call surround sound "3D sound" either so I never quite understood it, especially since you can have stereoscopy without 3D, for instance, most notably, re-release of The Lion King.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yeah, 3D isn't all that much. Avatar's 3D was neat, but nothing special there either...it's more of a bloody money suck than anything else.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I agree unfortunately :/
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
They're developing 4D now though. Maybe that will make some change...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lol, don't you just hate the blue and red 3d glasses? Movies with those are just awful.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, especially when the 3D is non-existant
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I know, but at least it's working really well for the two chaps in the drawing! I mean, it's like the swordsfox is really there!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Lol, yeah or is it real? Who know
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah! Awesome! At least until he bumps into an audience member. Then everyone kinda freaks out......
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That would be cool though, you gotta admit. At least until the sword starts swinging. Then things just get scary!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
And messy... if the sword is not just a prop....
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ewwww, gross!
Those poor audience members.......
They never knew that the theater's 3d was that good.........
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lol virtual reality at it's best
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Depends on how close you're sitting to the screen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
i always sit first row D:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Some advice for you then....
Run as soon as the swordfight starts!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I've seen your comment on like the last 3 deviations I've clicked .. seriously, are we just looking at all the same shit here? lmao
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Epic pic is epic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1