HOME | DD

CheshireCaterling In reply to Nexus-Fox [2018-06-06 16:41:25 +0000 UTC]

Commenting before checking and seeing that it’s since been ammended is pretty shitty too.

Plus the initial ruling was specified by the commissioner; it was never my decision.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nexus-Fox In reply to CheshireCaterling [2019-02-10 22:04:32 +0000 UTC]

A shitty practice is a shitty practice, either releasing it privately to whoever commissioned it and leaving it at that or releasing it to the public after the commission is over makes sense, the fact they requested that it be available to the public for a limited time is one of the strangest and  frankly assholeish things that could have been done for anyone looking to appreciate it, Didn't say that's on you, whoever made that decision is the one who is at fault, because otherwise they shouldn't have allowed for it to be released to the public in any capacity whatsoever if they don't want a response to it, especially for a short term tease and then casting the uncensored version into the ether for no good reason, what does keeping people from seeing the uncensored version now help with? If anything all this situation is doing is leaving a bad taste in people's mouths when thinking about making any deals here.

And what do you mean by amended?  It still says that the link will be up for one week only, from 7 years ago. There's no point, that segment should be edited out of the description as it serves absolutely no purpose and only teases potential viewers into clicking onto a 403'd link, which again I ask, what does this accomplish?

It's also exceptionally funny that you'll take the time to respond to a comment on the post, but not actually edit the post to get rid of the  LONG expired offer that is the root of the problem. Especially given the fact the original is obtainable from your blogspot, but according to your reasoning it shouldn't be there either if it was meant to be unobtainable from that point on.

3.bp.blogspot.com/-2qvAtxXH5ig…

In the end, I ask, what is the point of the run-around on something as simple as an uncensored version of an image that you are hosting anyway despite claiming some sort of scarcity of it's hosting?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CheshireCaterling In reply to Nexus-Fox [2019-02-25 17:14:30 +0000 UTC]

.......dude this conversation is a year old at this point...what prompted you to suddenly reply now after all that time?

I totally forgot about all this but edited the description either way.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CheshireCaterling In reply to iletyoutickleme [2012-05-22 07:38:03 +0000 UTC]

You and plenty of others LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

iletyoutickleme In reply to CheshireCaterling [2012-05-22 18:02:22 +0000 UTC]

so i noticed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

CheshireCaterling In reply to Tkldrawer [2012-02-11 02:43:13 +0000 UTC]

Thats 's character Rylie who's a "futanari" which is basically a hermaphrodite of sorts. Its sort of a fetish in its own right, best of both worlds and all that. I myself do have a couple of characters who are futa as well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tkldrawer In reply to CheshireCaterling [2012-02-11 11:47:40 +0000 UTC]

o...
kinda weird...
but ok

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CheshireCaterling In reply to Tkldrawer [2012-02-11 14:21:36 +0000 UTC]

Well you could say that the tickling fetish is pretty damn weird too...I mean most people would probably understand hermaphrodite porn a lot better than tickling porn LOL

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tkldrawer In reply to CheshireCaterling [2012-02-11 19:41:03 +0000 UTC]

actualy... i do not watch any porn...
yes... I've got kinda tickle fetish and yes, it's pretty damn weird too
but if you say you don't have a tickle fetish....
i wont believe u.
XD but still love your artworks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CheshireCaterling In reply to Tkldrawer [2012-02-12 02:24:02 +0000 UTC]

Oh no you misunderstand me! I most definitely do have a tickling fetish along with a foot fetish, futanari fetish among other assorted kinks. I was just making a point that the average person would find the futanari/hermaphrodite thing less odd than being aroused by tickling.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tkldrawer In reply to CheshireCaterling [2012-02-12 13:02:12 +0000 UTC]

ok.
so everyone has their own taste, hah.
i know what u mean.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0