Comments: 23
AbdoHad [2012-10-27 09:28:06 +0000 UTC]
amazing !
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
lamorth-the-seeker In reply to ChromaticBokeh [2012-09-27 02:18:51 +0000 UTC]
... And the MC fisheye. I've found both, but no way could I afford the $500 for the vfc or $? it was for the fisheye.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ChromaticBokeh In reply to lamorth-the-seeker [2012-09-27 07:31:59 +0000 UTC]
aah the fisheye rokkor... i wouldnt do that.
not because its a bad lens but the price relation.
for testing i would go for an m42 zenitar 16mm and adapt it to SR.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
lamorth-the-seeker In reply to ChromaticBokeh [2012-09-29 21:13:09 +0000 UTC]
I want the mc rokkor more for it's 'low quality' era appropriate optics. I have a fish for my Nikon, and it gets near perfect quality. The price is pretty steep, but it's no where near the top of my get-it list.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
duncan-blues In reply to ChromaticBokeh [2012-09-24 15:56:00 +0000 UTC]
I got an MD 50/1.2 and an MC 50/1.7
Still looking for an MD 85/2
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Bokkie312 [2012-09-23 08:51:31 +0000 UTC]
Excellent product shot. The aluminium background is an awesome idea!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1