Comments: 37
chrusel In reply to mariyaolshevska [2009-12-23 19:50:27 +0000 UTC]
hi there
a fav is a fav one could say. but a fav from such a talent and pro like you is worth more than many others. thanks so much for faving [link]
i appreciate it very much.
what i appreciate even more is that you featured it along all those wonderful peaces of art. i feel verey honoured.
π: 0 β©: 1
bimberion [2009-07-10 09:45:10 +0000 UTC]
Awesome
π: 0 β©: 0
astana-san [2009-05-04 17:18:34 +0000 UTC]
wonderful!
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to astana-san [2009-05-04 22:31:00 +0000 UTC]
cheers mate. that's good to hear.
π: 0 β©: 0
Evoli-chan [2009-05-04 15:31:20 +0000 UTC]
WoW!!!! This is amazing!!!
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to Evoli-chan [2009-05-04 22:31:23 +0000 UTC]
i'm glad you like it. thanks.
π: 0 β©: 0
iblackmilk [2008-02-04 12:31:36 +0000 UTC]
awesome
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to iblackmilk [2008-02-04 17:40:05 +0000 UTC]
cheers mate and thanks for the fav.
π: 0 β©: 0
chrusel In reply to suikoshi [2006-08-16 19:46:04 +0000 UTC]
Thanks for the comment and the fav. Feels so good to get one for this shot.
π: 0 β©: 0
Stalker72 [2005-12-18 08:10:31 +0000 UTC]
flawless
π: 0 β©: 0
robswan [2005-05-21 14:10:48 +0000 UTC]
Brilliant composition, and the lighting and the use of the black tray and mat have cleary worked amazingly.
The focus would be my biggest worry. Because of the way all of the elements are aranged it seems you really need them all to equally be in focus. But with an aperture of F3.2 that's just not going to happen. I'm assuming you had a tripod? I'd set the aperture to something smaller to increase the focal range, and then just increase the shutter time accordingly. If you did this without a tripod... well done sir!!!
My only compositional complaint is that the horizon is slightly bent... but it's almost not noticable.
I'm meaning to set up some nice shots like this in the future - good work!
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to robswan [2005-06-03 09:51:25 +0000 UTC]
hey there,
sorry for not having answered to your comment for such a long time. i didn't have internet acces in the last few weeks.
thanks very much for that long comment. it means a lot to me when people look at my work as close as you did. i'm very happy with the way the picture turned out but in my opinion some things could have been much better. as you mentioned, there is a lack in focus. but i have to tell you that i don't know much about photography and this shot was kind of my first experience in small studio photography. i can't even tell you whether i used a tripod or not because i have no clue about what this is. could you explain me???
thanks again for taking your time to write that comment. it's much apreciated.
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to robswan [2005-06-19 10:02:37 +0000 UTC]
thanks again for taking your time to give me this explenation. as a matter of fact i did not have a tripod which, as you said, didn't make it easy to take this picture. i bought one recently...
π: 0 β©: 0
bobletta [2005-05-05 20:45:22 +0000 UTC]
wow! I love the whole black/off-white thing you got going on! it's great!!
π: 0 β©: 0
chrusel In reply to callamoon [2005-02-18 22:22:10 +0000 UTC]
i hope you'll give the small studio photography another try someday. it took me a lot of time until i was pleased with what i saw. but i think it was worth it. i'm quite happy with the result, especially because it was my first try on something like this and i'm not a very experienced photographer.
to answer your question: the only light i used is the one that you see in the picture. the rest of the room was completely dark. i like your thoughts about the oxygen bar and stuff. i've not yet thought about it from this point of view.
π: 0 β©: 0
little-tequila-man [2005-01-05 11:58:19 +0000 UTC]
Very professional look you got there...
How about just 'Milk'? 'Bar' seems to give it a bit of a kitch 80's feel... but that might just be me.
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to little-tequila-man [2005-01-05 12:28:13 +0000 UTC]
hello again
how is life in NZ?
thanks for your comments. about the title: i agree that "milk" would already be better but it's not what i'm looking for. yesterday i tried to come up with a new title while taking a very close look of the pic. the result of it was: "8"
can you imagine why?
π: 0 β©: 2
chrusel In reply to chrusel [2005-01-07 10:01:48 +0000 UTC]
no it's not the 8-ball, but that would be another good solution.
the number 8 is already existing in the pic. take a closer look at the smoke!
π: 0 β©: 1
chrusel In reply to exhocet [2009-05-04 22:42:23 +0000 UTC]
brilliant!!! i used to listen to mike oldfield many years ago and the idea for the title works perfectly fine for me. i guess i'll change it but not today anymore. i really have to go to bed now. but thanks a lot for taking your time to come up with such a good idea.
π: 0 β©: 1
pavkata [2005-01-05 04:24:44 +0000 UTC]
it's a very well done photo, and the idea is very good too...i just find it's a bit cluttered, but perhaps that is what you were going for....either way, i still think the photo is great
π: 0 β©: 0
cassetteonfire [2005-01-05 04:17:03 +0000 UTC]
the colors are great, its sophisticated looking. all the objects look well together, without looking too cluttered. nice work.
π: 0 β©: 0