HOME | DD

cisiopurple In reply to IndominusPrime99 [2020-07-16 18:44:46 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to Tyranno63 [2020-05-30 21:34:34 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tyranno63 In reply to cisiopurple [2020-07-07 23:15:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cisiopurple In reply to Tyranno63 [2020-07-16 17:25:28 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Tyranno63 In reply to cisiopurple [2020-07-16 17:36:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to Atlantis536 [2020-01-25 16:29:10 +0000 UTC]

that gray seems enough dark to me

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to Deform2018 [2019-12-13 20:28:10 +0000 UTC]

I better checked and rescaled it
www.google.com/search?q=grypos…

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to IndominusPrime99 [2019-12-13 15:12:23 +0000 UTC]

Done 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to IndominusPrime99 [2019-09-04 18:56:21 +0000 UTC]

G.notabilis

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to aurtis89 [2018-09-05 17:59:00 +0000 UTC]

Si, lo scheletro di Auditore mi piaceva di più e su alcuni generi mi piace essere molto accurato 
mi pare sia G. notabilis

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aurtis89 In reply to Atlantis536 [2018-09-01 23:15:38 +0000 UTC]

Uhmmmm Why ? Gryposaurus and Kritosaurus are at least 10 to 15 million years apart. This seems like a very big stretch to me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Atlantis536 In reply to aurtis89 [2018-09-02 01:36:30 +0000 UTC]

That's "Kritosaurus incurvimanus". K. navajovius is still a distinct, but closely related taxon.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

aurtis89 In reply to Atlantis536 [2018-09-02 10:42:03 +0000 UTC]

Exactly, which is why there still should be a diagram for Kritosaurus navajovius as distincted from Gryposaurus monumentensis, rather than pushing the genus aside as a synonim.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to Atlantis536 [2018-08-28 14:28:55 +0000 UTC]

Both adjusted  

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

cisiopurple In reply to AndreOF-Gallery [2018-02-14 18:59:03 +0000 UTC]

Nein! XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 0