Comments: 15
PirateStann [2017-05-30 03:58:01 +0000 UTC]
Not bad at all. But in the future consider that it's never a good idea to have a light source *directly* behind someone.
π: 0 β©: 1
CJhammond In reply to PirateStann [2017-06-19 20:09:46 +0000 UTC]
there was limited space in the room here so we had to use what we had available. I would have used the bed but Tara was sleeping and we did'nt want to wake her up
π: 0 β©: 1
PirateStann In reply to CJhammond [2017-06-20 08:01:12 +0000 UTC]
So really more a document of a fun evening. Good times!
π: 0 β©: 1
PirateStann In reply to CJhammond [2017-06-22 08:58:38 +0000 UTC]
With a very small amount of effort they could be considerably more. I'm talking a $20 investment in lights.
π: 0 β©: 1
CJhammond In reply to PirateStann [2018-02-07 10:01:10 +0000 UTC]
If I could afford those lights I'd use them. the photography lights are going for a lot more then $20 I have used my friends lights before and he said he bought them for $2-$300
π: 0 β©: 1
PirateStann In reply to CJhammond [2018-02-07 21:07:37 +0000 UTC]
You can get the aluminum dome clip/clamp lights on Amazon for under eight bucks. I attach mine to a camera tripod (which extends up to eight feet tall) I got at the thrift store for five bucks. Really you don't need to invest a lot of money.
π: 0 β©: 1
CJhammond In reply to PirateStann [2018-02-14 11:05:34 +0000 UTC]
I'll look into them. usually I try to use natural light but on occasion I've been able to use a friends studio lighting for shoots
π: 0 β©: 1
PirateStann In reply to CJhammond [2018-02-22 21:31:34 +0000 UTC]
Available light is good for both an accurate representation of the scene as well being less intrusive for the girl-in-question. But the shots do tend to be grainier and less crisp.
π: 0 β©: 0
ste60000 [2017-05-29 20:45:09 +0000 UTC]
Wow figure!
π: 0 β©: 1
ste60000 In reply to CJhammond [2017-05-30 00:53:23 +0000 UTC]
3 tara next to her and both nice!
π: 0 β©: 1