HOME | DD

CMWVisualArts — Catacombs - Fractal Art by-nc-nd

Published: 2012-05-13 09:24:31 +0000 UTC; Views: 731; Favourites: 23; Downloads: 64
Redirect to original
Description HAH! Made stars without a tutorial. Anyway, this is a redo of my much older fractal titled Five . I started from a SpherEye Bubble [almost my last, I promise!], and got to this.

Apophysis 7x.

EDIT [5/15/12 8:00 AM] -

Changed name from "Five Revamped" back to the original, "Catacombs".
Related content
Comments: 20

redmatilda [2012-08-02 10:25:16 +0000 UTC]

Wonderfully different, and I love the tonings and the overall composition.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to redmatilda [2012-08-02 17:43:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anjaleck [2012-05-14 06:54:42 +0000 UTC]

Nicely done! I like the effect of tunnels going off in different directions.
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-15 05:28:12 +0000 UTC]

Thank you! The original name was "Catacombs", but I wanted it to be known that it was based off of my old fractal.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-15 05:32:40 +0000 UTC]

I understand that one.
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-15 05:38:52 +0000 UTC]

I might change it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-15 06:51:39 +0000 UTC]

And you can do that! That would be your choice. I would probably change it, but that is entirely my opinion.
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-15 17:58:35 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'd do it, but it seems it already did...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-16 05:39:52 +0000 UTC]

Huh? It just changed on it's own? How weird! Oh... I know... you did it and are being sly about it. Don't try to fool an old lady. I might believe you!
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-17 06:50:32 +0000 UTC]

I've been caught. Bravo.
And now to meet your demise!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-17 07:05:26 +0000 UTC]

LOLOL... Well, I was gonna believe you and then I though, huh-uh. There's no way it could have changed itself. I might be naive at times, but I wasn't born yesterday.
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-17 07:08:56 +0000 UTC]

Well somebody was born yesterday. I don't know how that was meant to have anything to do with this, but hey.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-17 07:12:44 +0000 UTC]

Well, it's supposed to mean that I'm not a baby to be fooled easily. It's an old saying. I guess I'm dating myself, hmm?
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-17 07:31:44 +0000 UTC]

No, I know what the saying means, I mean I don't know if what I said had to do with anything

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-18 05:23:23 +0000 UTC]

Okay... I just went through the conversation and it was in reference to me almost believe the name changed itself.
Hugs,
ANj

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to anjaleck [2012-05-18 06:19:12 +0000 UTC]

You said "I wasn't born yesterday".
I said "Well somebody was born yesterday. I don't know how that was meant to have anything to do with this, but hey. "

When I said that, I mean I have no idea if what I said in the last sentence had to do with anything, I didn't mean what you said had nothing to do with anything

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-18 06:27:04 +0000 UTC]

Oh... I think I understand now. I gotcha. Yeah, someone was born yesterday.
Silly us!
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

anjaleck In reply to CMWVisualArts [2012-05-18 05:20:03 +0000 UTC]

Gee, you got me now... I'm gonna have to go back and look at what you said when I said that. It might have been to do with you changing the name on the deviation and you implying it changed itself and me almost being fooled by it.
Hugs,
Anj

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fractal1 [2012-05-14 04:09:54 +0000 UTC]

I like this! It has a lot of hollows that I'm about to be sucked into! Yikes! Nice cool colours, and the pattern is very attractive.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

CMWVisualArts In reply to fractal1 [2012-05-15 05:28:34 +0000 UTC]

Thanks a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0