HOME | DD

Coga — Tulip Tree

Published: 2007-05-30 17:12:46 +0000 UTC; Views: 1944; Favourites: 50; Downloads: 36
Redirect to original
Description the tulip tree in my backyard is so gorgeous when it blooms.


disposable.


I need a scanner.
Related content
Comments: 25

VXthinkwinkXV [2010-06-07 00:03:36 +0000 UTC]

excellent quality for a disposable camera. it looks as if you used a warming filter.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chippy009 [2009-03-01 13:59:48 +0000 UTC]

nice subject, the colours are pretty too!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

areml [2007-12-28 07:50:20 +0000 UTC]

i really like the look of this. the pictures are nice, but they way you've presented them really works for me.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Kalendis [2007-08-15 00:54:26 +0000 UTC]

hey, this is beautiful. Great colors!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to Kalendis [2007-08-15 01:30:39 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ichthyophobia [2007-07-07 04:54:31 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful.
the colors are perfect.
Reminds me of Japan.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to ichthyophobia [2007-07-07 04:57:29 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MorganaLe [2007-06-13 00:22:46 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful. I love the colors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to MorganaLe [2007-06-13 00:25:38 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MorganaLe [2007-06-13 00:22:43 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful. I love the colors.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xauthorunknown [2007-06-03 23:10:46 +0000 UTC]

i agree with the others, the colors are so so pretty. i love spring.
and also, not having a scanner sucks. try using one of your friend's maybe? that's what i use to do.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HelloGO [2007-06-01 18:07:05 +0000 UTC]

Lovely!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to HelloGO [2007-06-01 18:20:52 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

aReasontoHope [2007-05-31 13:06:03 +0000 UTC]

absolutely love the blue.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to aReasontoHope [2007-05-31 18:43:00 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

skankinmonkey [2007-05-31 01:13:49 +0000 UTC]

girrl what kind of disposable are you using? slash film cos the color quality is fucking amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Coga In reply to skankinmonkey [2007-05-31 01:51:15 +0000 UTC]

um, it was either Kodak or this cheap generic brand one I got at Ike's. I can't remember.

I'm pretty sure it was Kodak, though.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuerenSegovia In reply to skankinmonkey [2007-05-31 01:28:59 +0000 UTC]

i really agree. very vibrant. fuji, maybe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

QuerenSegovia [2007-05-30 23:12:43 +0000 UTC]

NO SCANNER THIS IS AMAZING

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to QuerenSegovia [2007-05-30 23:15:12 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuerenSegovia In reply to Coga [2007-05-31 01:28:36 +0000 UTC]

what did you use to take the original pictures?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to QuerenSegovia [2007-05-31 01:48:59 +0000 UTC]

a disposable camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

QuerenSegovia In reply to Coga [2007-05-31 03:16:29 +0000 UTC]

oh damn, we got a little terry richardson on our hands. haha.
inspiring to say the least. especially when everyone thinks everything has to be super super sharp & clear with your ten thousand dollar camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tjasa [2007-05-30 18:21:32 +0000 UTC]

lovely, magnolia right?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Coga In reply to tjasa [2007-05-30 18:43:23 +0000 UTC]

thanks. :]

um, I think it's a species of magnolia.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0