Description
After seeing Rob Caswell's original sketches for what would become the Action transport, I decided it was about time to revisit this ship, and work her up as the original artist intended, especially as the wide body layout is, IMHO, far better looking.
Rob's original is here...
th09.deviantart.net/fs71/PRE/f…
You can see Rob's sketch for a front elevation in the lower right.
As Rob described the ship as originally being a replenishment ship for the Alliance fleet, with a pair of boom arms for refueling, I Identified what I assume is meant to be the boom, and also scaled the ship based on what seems to be obviously a doorway immediately below the boom's hinge housing.
That puts the ship at 64.5 meters rather than the usually listed 125, which is as close to 50% as makes little difference, which leads me to think at some point an editor somewhere simply doubled the length. This seems to be a common scaling issue; the other one I run into often is confusing imperial and metric measurements, a ship that's sixty feet gets listed as sixty meters, or vice versa.
-------------------------
V5b Specific
There have been extensive tweaks to the detailing, but the main thing is doing the colour and shading.
Comments: 9
BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 03:30:53 +0000 UTC]
Also, hey Rob stop reading my mind and stealing my ideas!!!!!!!!! (boom for refueling)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 03:30:22 +0000 UTC]
oh and I thought the Action 6 was 125, while the previous ones are shorter?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonialChrome In reply to BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 03:38:38 +0000 UTC]
According to the difficult to spell wiki...
2 = 100m
4 = 100m
5 = 115m
6 = 125m
But I'm pretty sure the lower numbers are ret-cons, and the first stated length was 125.
Could well be wrong, though, I can't be arsed to trawl through the RASB.
Either way, this version is shorter, made to fit the airlock door rather than WEGs almost always dodgy stats.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
ColonialChrome In reply to BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 23:58:57 +0000 UTC]
It's so much easier when you stop giving a shit about canon.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BaronNeutron In reply to ColonialChrome [2015-11-16 03:07:30 +0000 UTC]
so what lead you to think the scale was off? Couldnt it just as easily be 125 meters?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 03:29:44 +0000 UTC]
love the angle from the front
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ColonialChrome In reply to BaronNeutron [2015-11-15 03:34:14 +0000 UTC]
The front angle was the whole reason to start, and more or less finish this project. It's been MUCH longer than my usual ships, but I just had to bring the correct shaped ship into the world.
👍: 1 ⏩: 0