HOME | DD
Conservatoons β No Obama zone
Published: 2012-07-14 04:03:15 +0000 UTC; Views: 1915; Favourites: 37; Downloads: 66
Redirect to original
Description
I sign I hope to see posted on every telephone and light pole in all 57 states.Elections matter.
Related content
Comments: 45
Some may say that Romney is just like Obama, still good in the long run I think.
At least that way, people will realize just how little alternative there is, members of the GOP may prolly know better than allow the dirty tactics that removed Ron Paul and Cain.
Romney would be politically weaker because he is white and republican, also inheriting the mess left by Obama. Thus, he wouldnΒ΄t be able to suspend the 2016 elections with executive orders as a Nov 2012 re-elected Obama would.
π: 0 β©: 0
Not Obama. That leaves Romney
π: 0 β©: 1
I see. What of Ron Paul?
π: 0 β©: 1
Nothing of Ron. He is out.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I heard he wasn't campaigning anymore. Shame. He was the only candidate who made sense.
π: 0 β©: 0
Gotta include Alaska & Hawaii on that map!!! Don't leave him any place to go!
π: 0 β©: 2
Yeah, I forgot about the 58th & 59th states.
π: 0 β©: 0
Take it for whatever anyone wants to make of it-
[link]
π: 0 β©: 1
Can ya bottom line me on that?
π: 0 β©: 1
First of all this is an 'Executive Order' meaning there was no input/vote from the Legislative Branch or Supreme Court.
Second there are no real limitations set on this. The last section at the bottom is a farce-
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
Me- Since when has government ever respected law.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
Me - This from the same president that has let the TSA run rampant in the airports.
π: 0 β©: 1
So it is Obama as usual. It boggles the mind that Congress & media allow this prez to just do has he pleases w/o question. They forge the dagger that will be driven in their back.
π: 0 β©: 1
Unfortinatly, the damn press loves him. Bunch of liberal bastards.
π: 0 β©: 0
Hey, that means you've got only 3 left to go!
π: 0 β©: 0
If you don't mind, I'd be happy to print a few out and hang them up around town. Heck, I'd even put one outside my polling place on Election Day.
π: 0 β©: 1
Heh. I'll have to print these and post them at work. xD
π: 0 β©: 1
How easy is it to offend an Obama supporter? well watch the [link] and find out
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah it is pretty offensive to ask them why they support the Prez.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'd be offende if someone thought I supported Obama too. 
π: 0 β©: 0
I'd seriously rather have shitt romney over obama, and that's saying something.
π: 0 β©: 1
I feel about the same. Our choice is limited.
π: 0 β©: 0
loooool maybe if you shoot some stuff america's problems will sort themselves out. That's how americans sort their problems out isn't it?
π: 0 β©: 0
So, judging by the picture, you're exiling Obama to Alaska?
π: 0 β©: 1
Not sure Alaskans would want him.
π: 0 β©: 0
What's the alternative to No Obama? I'm listening... got nothing? Think it up a bit and try not to say something stupid. Please don't say anything Republican based, your argument just becomes invalid then (fuck republicans and fuck democrats). I'm with you, Obama is a retarded person for putting the idea that insurance companies need to be in-between medical care and people. That is a huge step backwards.
If you have a brain, people read this:
"X" wants to pay "Y" for service "A", but "Z" wants a piece of "X's" money so they say, you cannot pay "Y" for "A" directly, you have to pay me "Z" money all the time even when you don't need "A". They conclude, even though "X" has to pay for "A", "Y" would charge way too much for "A", so pay both "Z" and "Y" for service "A" and you will pay less. If you can follow this logic, or lack of logic, there is one piece that "Z" argues, and this is their only argument. "Y" will charge "X" way too much, like they haven't done in the past 100 years, but they could. All sources point to the fact that "Y" does not do that, but we will make "X" scared of that idea so we "Z" can profit. Final thought, "Z" is a fucking prick that uses "X's" innate fear to get money.
This country, USA, needs a complete restructuring and cleaning, too much old money and lineage involved in politics. If Hilary Clinton was voted in as president in 2008, I would have left the country because we would have had a Bush, Clinton, Bush, then Clinton giving our country an "elected" Bush-Clinton Dynasty. As it is, we can still think of it as the Bush-Clinton Dynasty, but a second Clinton would have just been the deal sealer. School children 50 years from now would ask questions like, "why is there 2 Bushes here, within the same 10 year spread".
What else can you call it other than a Dynasty, their power is on par. The US population cannot be trusted with voting for a president. But that's not the entire truth, the popular vote means nothing, so citizens, I ask you, why are you letting this happen? Why are we so passively stupid that we don't care about those who take control without much resistance (almost all resistance is from the lords of our land fighting among themselves). Is it because of our drugs? Our food? Our idiocy in front of a TV after a hard day of work? How did this apathy become main-stream. Drugs = Apathy, anyone saying otherwise needs to understand they are arguing for a singular self-centered and self-gratifying reality akin to masturbation, which promotes the same mental state. All drugs should be legal and then we would have a mess for 10 years followed by a culture that has grown up seeing retarded people being retarded, so they will choose to not be retarded. If only we could get only people on drugs in one place so they would not have society to fall back upon. Then we would see them die and that would be fine. If they do not die, then they are more powerful for it, maybe they can even become better for it. We could do that with our gay/lesbian/whatever animal I suck population. After 100 years there will be a critical stop, because they cannot live without "normal" sexual people or normal sexual acts (reproduction). Of course the bisexuals would reproduce and as such they are not leeching off others, so they are not lumped into that group (even though they seem too horny for their own good, but whatever). I'm just kind of tired of my life being more difficult because I "have to" help others because they make wrong choices or multiple mistakes. Helping others should come from me, you, individuals, not some publicly mandated political faction. We shouldn't help others because we feel guilt, responsibility, or pleasure from doing so. We need to help others because they need help (as long as they aren't the one at fault through stupid actions or children, who are still learning). I've seen people come back from making poor choices, but they are a horrendous minority. Most people that make bad choices do so over and over again, they never learn.
What has become of the USA that I lived in for 30 years? I have become a scientist in order to find out more information, but there is a critical stop on research due to ignorance and preoccupation with other countries who need to just kill themselves (we need to stay out of it, even if it has to do with our financial position). This is not the direction we should be going... we need to remember what drive is, and what purpose we can have on this planet we only have access to for 65-100 years. (Nothing religious here, I'm just stating what we know from an agnostic point of view)
Oh, one more thing... don't put up stupid little slogans and think you are smart for doing so. You are just being arrogant and that doesn't help others, it only helps yourself, much like drugs and masturbation.
π: 0 β©: 3
Someone who's not a commie. That'd be better, thanks.
π: 0 β©: 0
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 1
Is Conservatoons telling alpharalph "no hippies please" because that is what it looks like to me.
π: 0 β©: 0
What horse hockey! Your verbiage doesn't trump a simple, but correct, illustration. (Speaking of which, how do you react to Obummer's campaign slogan of "Forward!" Forward top what? "I have seen the future and it works" communist crap?)
Sorry, but I've been an American for 59 years, so I guess I have seniority over you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Retarded is one way to describe "Forward" as a campaign slogan. I didn't even know that was his slogan - I had to make sure and look it up. VorwΓ€rts! VorwΓ€rts! was the Nazi youth slogan, and that seemed to work on their masses... geese.
"What horse hockey!" - I'm sorry, I don't understand what you are saying here.
"Your verbiage doesn't trump a simple, but correct, illustration." - did you even read anything I wrote besides the first sentence? And perhaps how old I am?
I'm glad that you are 59 years old and can use the internet though... and seniority is a relative term, you would be my senior if you were a fellow scientist who has been in the field longer than me. If you are, I'd love to hear more about your understanding of particle physics. Just when I think I understand it completely, I don't.
For you to call communist crap is great and all, shows much understanding about just what communism is. "I have seen the future and it works." Are you quoting that Finkelstein guy? The only examples of communism I've witnessed were definitely no Communisms. You cannot have communism with elitists.
You play left for dead 2? (checks posts) Yeah, you do... that's cool.
π: 0 β©: 1
I found it... the quote from Lincoln Steffens, that's who said "I've seen the future and it works."
Guess I needed to be a little older or take more social science classes, the liberal colleges don't seem to talk much about him.
π: 0 β©: 0
No. I mean 57. [link]
It was a slip. But he never admits to mistakes. Somehow Bush put words in his mouth.
π: 0 β©: 2
I love how it's always considered "stupid" unless it's Obama saying it.
π: 0 β©: 0
The scary thing is the United Arab Emirates is considered to be known as 57 States!
π: 0 β©: 1
No, he made a joke about Obama. I believe when he started campaigning he had said he had campaigned in 57 states.
π: 0 β©: 1
Oh haha, I wasn't aware of that XD
π: 0 β©: 1
In Obama's original campaign. Sorry should have said that also
π: 0 β©: 0