HOME | DD
Conservatoons — Not-So-Great Minds
Published: 2013-11-26 05:03:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 2314; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 8
Redirect to original
Related content
Comments: 98
History is a bit unfair to Mr.Chamberlain. Documents were found, that he KNEW that there would be war but England wasn't yet ready to fight (especially the airforce)
So he bought his contry time to upgrade its military, so they were ready to fight if they had to...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
At least Chamberlin admitted that he messed up and took the first step to defeating the Nazis, and with the horrors of The Great War that ravaged an entire continent still fresh in people's memories, it's more understandable that he wanted to avoid war at all costs, as foolish as it was to try and appease the expansionist fascists.
Meanwhile, Obama isn't even doing anything with Iran. Not even a 'hey, stop that!', let alone putting sanctions on Iran who, like Nazi Germany, is a threat to the nations around it and even more so to its own people.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Reminds me of Harry Potter. "He who must not be named did great things. Terrible, yes. But great."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
So that's Chamberlain on the left? OK that makes sense
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Please read some history , just as far back as the U.S. involvement with sticking the Shah in power in 52, and the creation of one of the most brutal secret police organizations on the planet. American democracy a lie for ll those fools that believe in the " Free World". has nothing to fucking do with liberals , and hippies you moronic dickwad.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Silly lib, reason is for adults.
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chamberlain? Really? Wasn't he a conservative politician? Let's not forget that trying to compare selling parts of Czechoslovakia to Hitler to the nuclear issue in Iran is beyond idiotic as they are nothing alike.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Correct. Chamberlain was far less self-deluded.
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Freedom of speech extends to the internet, so I'm allowed to post my comments and thoughts here, and if you can't handle criticism, well that's your problem.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
"Freedom of speech extends to the internet"
...Exactly...so, by that definition, you both can post opinions.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I love comments from libs. They make me look so smart.
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
In your own bubble, and maybe to the minority who share your opinions. But to the majority of Americans and reality; your an idiot.
No idiots please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
This makes so little sense that Im assuming the air bubble in your brain burst .
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Silly lib, reason is for adults.
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Solid, logical, relevant point there, sir.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
No, he took a shit and you came out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sanctions. Blockade. Bomb enrichment sites. Iran is an enemy not a friend and never to be trusted as long as Muslim zealots rule.
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You'd rather him start yet another pointless war for no reason and piss off the majority of the US public? I thought the whole fearmongering panic over Iran was based around their possibly using nukes on America in the first place. Why would you want to provoke them into doing exactly that? The current leader of Iran is actually a moderate, if you took this stance they would nuke the freaking shit out of America within like a day lmao
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
He does it all the time. Obama cares little about US public opinion. Might as well prevent Muslim zealots from getting the bomb.
The current leader is not moderate. Not in any way the West would use the term.
I really wish they would try. It is the only way US media will take the zeal of radical Islam seriously. They say they want us and Jews dead daily in their media yet we think they really don't mean it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
You want them to try and nuke the US just to prove a political point to the media? Dude, that's pretty cold
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
No far right fruitcakes please
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I'd just like to point out that of Conservatoons' three alternatives, only one might lead to war (Bombing enrichment sites), and another has already been in place, without causing a war (Economic sanctions).
There were many ways to deal with this threat, but Obama chose to send aid, lift sanctions, and for the most part, reward Iran for its belligerence. In doing so, not only did he throw any Middle-Eastern allies we have left under the bus, but he also ignored the pleas of our European allies who were against such lunacy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Uh, couple of problems with that. 1. The sanctions were only partially lifted, akin to that of 7 billion dollars of relief. That's a drop in the bucket compared to nearly $1 trillion of Iran's GDP. Secondly, many Middle Eastern nations were in favor of the agreement, including U.S. backed allies Qatar, Kuwait, Bahrain, UAE, and even Saudi Arabia. www.aljazeera.com/news/middlee… Third, most of the European governments were in favour of the deal, including Great Britain, Russia, and the EU. The only one who raised the most ruckus was France surprisingly enough, considering that the Socialists are running the government.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
"another has already been in place, without causing a war (Economic sanctions)."
I thought the concern was over the development of Iran's nuclear program, which they already had? What would sanctions have achieved? It would at best slow them down, but they are already generating a steady supply of uranium and are a resource-rich nation.
Sorry, but what else could have been done, given that the purpose of US intervention was to ensure Iran didn't develop nuclear missiles? Short of invading and starting a war, diplomacy was Obama's only choice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sure we can trust Iran, they kept their word on... umm.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yep. They have the world's trust.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
So just because one guy fucked up, we should never negotiate with anyone, ever? What else should we do? Nuke Iran? This is a completely different situation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It is the same. A child in the adult world looking foolish (i.e. Liberalism)
no hippies please.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
That would implie Obama is the one who keeps his end of the deal.
1.bp.blogspot.com/-WH5r55fO7Aw…
For him, treaties are promises of betrayal.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
True. Though normally that is true only w/ our allies
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I think there could be a stuxnet-type attack on US infrastructures, which would be pinned on Iran and justifie far greater control of the internet for "security" reasons. Not just active surveillance but the beginning of something lihe China's great firewall.
Obama shed a few crocodile tears on national television, decrying the Iranian betrayal and blame Iran for the economic crisis and failing infrastructures, ignoring that they have been left to fall appart for a while now www.youtube.com/watch?v=ClUdgm… www.youtube.com/watch?v=aA_rrd… , blaming Iran has essentially replacing blaming Bush at this point.
Generals and soldiers deemed untrustworthy are kept busy, sent to the middle-east while ones loyal to the "leadership of color" townhall.com/columnists/toddst… gets to remain in the continental USA.
Depending if Obama sees a rise of support like Bush did after 9/11, thought he´ll prolly get less, the massive shortage of soldiers in the continental USA and the medias-hysteria about renewed terrorist attacks prompts open preparations for the formation a Civilian National Security Force, ready to be raised on a short notice if needed and directly answerable to the pothead-in-chief.
Was thinking of a poster aimed at Millenials.
Dodged Vietnam draft, sends you to Iran!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
A lot there.
I don't think he needs to get that tricky. He has the media and Congress. They are choosing not to oppose him and they are really the only ones who can stop him from doing whatever he wants.
Not a bad poster idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
I don't think John Kerry even got to bring back a piece of paper with which to declare "peace in our time", did he?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
It was on a thumb drive which he threw over the White House fence (w/ his phony medals)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
no no no . . . chamberlain had character with honor -- and admitted he f**ked up.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, it's Bush's fault and we're all racist right? Typical manta of the libtard left.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
No. Worst than Carter even.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
| Next =>