Comments: 84
ArcticFlower00 [2019-02-07 13:50:28 +0000 UTC]
In that it matches it's dictionary defintion?
π: 0 β©: 0
TheBlackCatComesOn13 [2015-03-20 07:28:49 +0000 UTC]
First - If underage people are going to have sex they may as well have protection, but, teen pregenancy is MUCH HIGHER in states without FULL SEX EDUCATION.So yes, the liberals are helping you here! We as humans have sex pretty early in life, and naturally teens are gonna have that urge.Β
Protection is very important so they don't get diseases, unwanted children, etc.Β
Second - Teen rates of weed consumption have gone down in states that have legalized. Pot is regulated like any drug, just as alchol, you have to be a certian age. Young people on it for medical reasons (seizures , cancer , serve anxiety) don't have the 'high' feeling contents in their medication.Β
π: 1 β©: 0
Cochegara [2014-10-07 19:33:51 +0000 UTC]
Isn't hemp cancervative specialty? LikeΒ Arnold Schwarzenegger?
π: 0 β©: 0
MadDadder [2014-10-03 19:45:35 +0000 UTC]
Awesome toon about personal responsibility.
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to MadDadder [2014-10-03 20:12:22 +0000 UTC]
willful ignorance hippies are known for
You are a fine rep.
π: 0 β©: 1
MadDadder In reply to Conservatoons [2014-10-03 20:38:47 +0000 UTC]
no bitch ass cop outs, please
π: 0 β©: 1
Naniga123 [2014-07-31 02:18:52 +0000 UTC]
I used to think I was a liberal but, after seeing that I "needed" to accept the femnazi-gender-neutral-pot-smoking-baby-killing-man-hating-hippie-whore values of them, I changed my mind. I still think gun and immigration laws should change for the better. No flames, please.
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to Naniga123 [2014-08-01 15:32:36 +0000 UTC]
I agree. Β More guns, less gun restrictions and sealing the borders and allowing only productive people in.
π: 0 β©: 0
sanjouin-dacapo [2014-04-23 17:00:18 +0000 UTC]
I believe that marijuana use should be legalized, but only for those at the age of majority or older - not for kids. I'm not a hippy, but I believe that prohibition against substances doesn't work. As for abortions and stuff, they should only be a last resort, like if a child(especially a seven-year-old) has been impregnated since a little girl could be killed by a pregnancy. My sister doesn't want children but is conservative, and she's been taking lots of precautions in order to not get pregnant. And I wonder why so many people don't know how to do the 69, which prevents pregnancy since sperm can't get to the uterus through the digestive tract.
π: 0 β©: 0
BeArstyle [2013-10-11 23:06:40 +0000 UTC]
I'd much rather have children using cannabis and practicing safe sex than using alcohol and become teenage mums.
But maybe that's just me.
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to BeArstyle [2013-11-18 01:37:06 +0000 UTC]
Interesting choices, though you'd need to be painfully liberal to think those were the only options.Β Sad really.
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 1
BeArstyle In reply to Conservatoons [2013-11-19 16:56:13 +0000 UTC]
Of course there are more options, there is an ocean of drugs, although cannabis is one of the softer drugs (less addictive than nicotine and less dangerous to society than alcohol)Β
and there are ways of sex that does not necessarily leads to pregnency.Β
But humans will be humans, and I believe that almost all humans will persue sex and drugs. It is my belief that this is something we do instinctively, something we will never be able to fully control. Therefore, I consider it to desireable to make sure people have safe sex and use the most harmless drugs, rather than try to prohibit the behavior.Β
I also believe that sex is good for you, and that tere is nothing wrong with sex for the sake of pleasure as long as it is practiced freely and with mutual respect among the participants. It keeps away depression, make you happy and helps the body to stay healthy. Β
And finally; What do you have against hippes? What's wrong with peace and love? Don't you agree with Jesus' teachings?
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to BeArstyle [2013-11-20 06:41:35 +0000 UTC]
Hippies are generally dirty, lazy entitled losers.Β Peace and love are always at someone else's expense.Β Β They have low standards and lower goals.Β Pathetic really.
Jesus was not a hippy.Β He expects greatness in people.Β Liberal encourage the very worst in people.
π: 0 β©: 1
BeArstyle In reply to Conservatoons [2013-11-21 20:47:30 +0000 UTC]
You seem to know alot of hippies, I must say, (any personal friends or famililies of yours whom are hippies?) and about the underlying causes about peace and love.Β
Although I may not be as knowledgeable as you, I must insist that peace and love are both free; love is an emotion, and peace just the absence of conflict and violence, which, atleast from what I understand, is free as well (War for peace, on the other hand, is something very expensive). Peace cannot be at someone else's expence, since it is basically about leaving people be; it is passive, not active. Threats against peace is on the other hand active.Β
Since you despise "hippies" som much, and claim that they have achieved nothing in life, might I ask you what you yourself have achieved? What do you consider to be an "achievement"? What goals are high and what goals are low?
And finally, is encourageing solidarity, empathy for one's fellow man, something bad? Is uneversal healthcare something evil? Diddn't Jesus himself cure the sick and disabled without charging them, diddn't he said "Love thy neighbour" and "Give all your possesions to the poor" ?
π: 0 β©: 2
ninjawerr In reply to BeArstyle [2014-03-05 05:03:22 +0000 UTC]
You got the ladder incorrect there buddy, for if we give all of our stuff to the poor, we cannot give it unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and God what belongs to him. I mean the Lord never condemns the rich who takes part in charity or helping his fellow man but he does condemn the rich who hordes all the gold, all the silver, and all the copper to himself despite the efforts of other men for him to get it.Β He never condemns the banker who is willing to ensure and protect a person's well earned money, but he does condemn the banker that even when the money is there, marks a check insufficient funds. Does not condemn the man strikes a man down in the name of his country, but he does condemn the man who refuses to act when the call is made, for violence may not the way, but he knows this world is not perfect that is why he let Peter keep his sword.Β
π: 0 β©: 0
Conservatoons In reply to BeArstyle [2013-11-23 08:40:12 +0000 UTC]
Hippies visit stupid upon my gallery.Β You are a case in point.
no hippies please.
See my FAQs.
π: 0 β©: 0
joshuarmour15 [2013-09-05 20:25:44 +0000 UTC]
Don't give it to children, but legalize drugs, tax it, regulate it, and stop funding a war we are losing.
π: 0 β©: 2
Conservatoons In reply to joshuarmour15 [2013-10-04 07:50:40 +0000 UTC]
Looks like we have a Paulie outbreak.
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 1
joshuarmour15 In reply to Conservatoons [2013-10-04 16:42:23 +0000 UTC]
You've proven you are too stupid to understand concepts.
Β
No gorillas, please.
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to joshuarmour15 [2013-10-12 17:52:35 +0000 UTC]
I have exposed a Ron Paulie zealot.
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 2
Conservatoons In reply to Marzipanzers [2014-01-25 22:56:38 +0000 UTC]
Many things.Β I mostly like him in financial matters but he is a wild nutter w/ world diplomacy.
π: 0 β©: 0
Alpha-12 In reply to Conservatoons [2013-11-05 02:52:36 +0000 UTC]
Marijuana isn't that bad actually. All it really does is mellow you out and temporarily degrade driving capability beyond damage your lungs like regular cigarettes, look at Californians. I'm not a pothead myself nor am I tempted to become one, but if we're gonna keep alcohol and tobacco around we may as well legalize weed. Prohibition isn't working and just funds drug cartels in Mexico (1/3, 40 to 50 percent of their revenue comes from weed). Plus what decent cop should waste his/her valuable time to handcuff stoned hippies? It'd be cheaper to just taze and pepper-spray them at OWS when they ask for more government.
Please do not call me a hippie, I refuse to be associated with those creeps.
π: 0 β©: 0
bttlrp [2013-08-01 16:35:23 +0000 UTC]
Ewww! Marijuana! Ban it, Ban it!!! Bring back prohibition! 6PM curfew for all! Abolish fun!
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to bttlrp [2013-10-04 07:51:20 +0000 UTC]
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 0
fernfrondllama [2013-07-31 23:13:43 +0000 UTC]
Fucking Christ. This is supposed to be a bad thing?
You conservatives are so damn dull. What do you people do for fun? Sit around not fucking each other ever, drinking whole milk, and doing exactly what your senile grandparents tell you?
π: 0 β©: 2
fernfrondllama In reply to Conservatoons [2013-10-14 08:28:33 +0000 UTC]
Big talk talking from someone who makes their living...how, again?
Is it drawing nasty, little, idiotic comics that tickle the shriveled cortexes of knuckle-dragging Republicans?
You people need to get out of the way and let the adults make the decisions. You are an embarrassment.
π: 0 β©: 1
Conservatoons In reply to fernfrondllama [2013-10-15 07:49:30 +0000 UTC]
The adults left DC in 2006.Β
The TEA Party is trying to return them to power.
no hippies please.
π: 0 β©: 1
fernfrondllama In reply to Conservatoons [2013-10-16 10:24:37 +0000 UTC]
Are these the same adults that think America is overrun with Islamic sleeper cells? I mean, boogeymen?
π: 0 β©: 0
bttlrp In reply to fernfrondllama [2013-08-02 03:01:48 +0000 UTC]
LOL exactly XD The puritans knew how to party!
π: 0 β©: 0
SpaniardWithKnives [2013-07-30 01:46:42 +0000 UTC]
Oh God... it is funny (the drawing) and that at the same time (the reality)...
π: 0 β©: 0
aceking90 [2013-07-22 13:00:32 +0000 UTC]
And at the right wing moron cafe people are served solid blocks of sugar covered fried fat and then go off to have unprotected sex so they can have their twentieth kid.
π: 0 β©: 2
Conservatoons In reply to aceking90 [2013-10-04 07:49:55 +0000 UTC]
All with no Government assistance.Β Β
π: 0 β©: 1
MaillouxStudios [2013-06-20 00:15:33 +0000 UTC]
So true....it's going to come to this soon....just sad, I swear
π: 0 β©: 0
bttlrp In reply to MJWilliam [2013-08-01 16:36:42 +0000 UTC]
LGBT pride? Why would you want to celebrate having an unconventional sexuality? /sarcasm
π: 0 β©: 1
MJWilliam In reply to bttlrp [2013-08-02 02:34:24 +0000 UTC]
Because duuuude, it's, like, so cool and stuff. *puff puff*
π: 0 β©: 0
GuillermoGage In reply to MJWilliam [2013-06-20 02:19:53 +0000 UTC]
Also, the comment section on that page was a painful drag. I snapped out of it after at least 10 minutes and closed the tab. And it's happening on a website with Andrew Breitbart's name on it.
π: 0 β©: 1
MJWilliam In reply to GuillermoGage [2013-06-21 17:50:57 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure what you mean. Comment section is often a painful drag on any given site.
π: 0 β©: 0
HKDP [2013-06-15 16:31:11 +0000 UTC]
FYI... This comic was featured on the "Chicks On The Right" FB page.
π: 0 β©: 1
| Next =>