HOME | DD

cricketumpire — The wasp who got the cream...

Published: 2012-10-19 21:51:54 +0000 UTC; Views: 622; Favourites: 44; Downloads: 14
Redirect to original
Description Sharing milk with a passing wasp.

Note to self - must get macro lens!
Related content
Comments: 13

Kasstle74 [2014-07-06 21:04:35 +0000 UTC]

This is beautiful!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Kasstle74 [2014-07-06 21:10:26 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-14 23:43:58 +0000 UTC]

I hate, hate, hate wasps when they cross paths with me, but this is a terrific shot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-14 23:57:20 +0000 UTC]

Thanks - the modern D-SLR really can into its own, take twenty get one! Could never have done it with the old film camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anita-Sanderson In reply to cricketumpire [2013-01-15 00:05:52 +0000 UTC]

My knowledge of cameras isn't as it used to be. I used to be really fanatical about photograph about 20 years ago (was fully kitted out with an Olympus camera, with attachable lenses, filters, tripod etc ), but now I own just a simple Fujifilm for quick snapshots. I'd love to get into it all again. Did you use a particular setting to get this shot then? Yes, digital cameras are definitely very cost effective too! hehe!...and very advanced with the settings that can be used. ...but you need a creative eye to capture such an amazing picture. The camera would be nothing without the person behind it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-15 11:43:00 +0000 UTC]

You might like to google "Ken Rockwell". I found his site very informative for camera information but also in tips and guidance in taking great photographs. his best quote is, to paraphrase, "It's the photographer not the camera that takes a great photograph". Just what you said!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anita-Sanderson In reply to cricketumpire [2013-01-16 00:38:59 +0000 UTC]

I think this is the same with any "tool" that a person uses. It's like driving a car isn't it? If the person doesn't drive very well, then it really doesn't matter whether they're driving a tin can of a car, or a top of the range sporty model...it's the same for "tool" really. Yes, I shall have a google of him! Thanks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-16 10:31:06 +0000 UTC]

I think you would enjoy exploring some of his thoughts and tips. One other comment I found especially useful was "In a nutshell, composition is all about Simplification and EXclusion (SEX)". It certainly works but is really difficult to be as brave as Ken Rockwell is. To crop or not to crop is the question!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anita-Sanderson In reply to cricketumpire [2013-01-18 01:21:59 +0000 UTC]

I've just googled Ken Rockwell and what he has to say about SEX. I suppose that he uses this term also helps people remember quicker too. Yep, I shall take a more indepth look at his website when it's not so early in the morning! His photos are definitely very impressive aren't they?! Well, I think sometimes, you just have go with your gut instinct when it comes to the crunch. The beautiful with digital photography is that you can always keep/save the original photo in it's initial form, electronically and should you change your mind, go back and snip the original about until you are happier with the finished result!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-18 11:05:04 +0000 UTC]

Glad you found it worthwhile - yes his pictures are good but seeing pictures of that quality, I don't know whether to try to match them or just give up! There are a lot of brilliant photographs on dA that make the same challenge!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anita-Sanderson In reply to cricketumpire [2013-01-21 07:50:39 +0000 UTC]

Well, if you spend most of your time worrying about whether your photographs will be as good as others, you eventually won't enjoy taking the photos!!! Personally, I think, as with all works of art (in whichever chosen format) that opinions alternate from one viewer to the next. This is because we all have different backgrounds and experiences that in turn, lead us to favouring certain techniques over others. Personally, I look at others' art work and if there is a different type of a picture out there with a technique that I haven't tried (and I like it) then I analyse the composition and apply the technique at a later stage to a piece of my own work.

I don't think one photo is "better" than the next, if it's at a certain standard. People tend to be very influenced by the "trend" of the time, so personally, if I was feeling as you are (confused!), I would concentrate on personal growth rather than concerning myself with whether my photos match up to the next persons.

With photography, I've discovered that the quality can often be hugely dependent upon the equipment that is used. I know for a fact, that using a Canon camera in preference to my basic Fujifilm camera, would produce a higher quality photo (identical shot - as in composition). Personally, I think, feeling anxious about whether your photos are better than the next person's is a waste of energy and often stifles creativity, so it's best not to think that way!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

cricketumpire In reply to Anita-Sanderson [2013-01-21 10:28:17 +0000 UTC]

Thanks for the encouragement - don't worry I will rise to the challenge. You may well be right about the dangers of comparison with others but, like sport, a challenge raises one's game! Taking the risk of trying to define a perfect photograph, it's "one that creates an interest with anybody, whatever the subject".

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Anita-Sanderson In reply to cricketumpire [2013-01-21 13:18:26 +0000 UTC]

It's a pleasure. Yes, I think you should. Well then, you've just answered your
original question haven't you?! ...you won't be giving up and that's good to read!
Yes indeed!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0