Comments: 34
SpiralHope55 [2018-04-22 12:28:21 +0000 UTC]
Art is showing your creativity, not mixed with stupid private parts!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BenioxoXox [2015-02-12 06:14:59 +0000 UTC]
I agree, quality over quantity, no matter how divine you may think your body looks, the quality has to be on high level to call it art. I personally think every human, clothes or without, is art, but when it comes to photos and online art, it needs to be taken with best possible cautions, lighting and resolution.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Miha-Chi [2014-07-15 21:01:42 +0000 UTC]
Uuuugh! That's freaking disgusting! I don't wanna see that on dA!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
nati11184 [2014-06-07 11:37:56 +0000 UTC]
So much yes ;A;
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
darknessthehedgehog3 [2014-06-06 00:28:35 +0000 UTC]
da really needs a better filter or better yet a blacklist so you could actually block certain art for ever showing up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Blackestfang [2013-11-16 13:11:38 +0000 UTC]
I longed on today and whats the first thing I see? a penis. yesterday a pussy. its so sicking. There is artistic nude bud privates and asses are not art. they are are gross.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Nappah [2013-04-21 12:49:31 +0000 UTC]
its just
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dreaming-Dog [2012-10-14 00:33:14 +0000 UTC]
I really wanna tell this to the rest of the artistic nudes on dA. I don't give a damn about the photo quality or how 'beautiful' it is. All I can spot in the photo first is tits, ass, and dick. 'Artistic nude' photos can't be on dA, in my opinion. Put it on porn sites or somethin'! Just not here!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
GhostOfBella [2011-12-08 23:02:51 +0000 UTC]
I support this stamp so much!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Yohnnilee [2011-07-24 22:39:57 +0000 UTC]
Thank you.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
pagescookies [2010-11-29 02:48:13 +0000 UTC]
i love how the stamp has sweetie at the end its like your teacvhing kids what art is XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vendbuy [2010-06-23 22:59:12 +0000 UTC]
ok, since it is a personal preferance as to what is "art" and what is "porn" who are you to say what the difference is to the rest of us? just because you say its porn doesnt mean it has no artistic value. I refuse to belive that YOU and people like you can judge for all of us what does and what doesnt have artistic value. I think what you mean to say is that you would like the content filters to work better. or your just a nazi troll and should be ignored.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Phreack In reply to vendbuy [2010-06-25 01:40:47 +0000 UTC]
dude, a bad cell phone quality pic of a butt belongs more in a porn site than it does on DA, chill out
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vendbuy In reply to Phreack [2010-06-25 04:37:19 +0000 UTC]
listen, I tend to get a bit passionate with my ranting, and I had just gotten hung up on while in an arguement about a similar topic right before I logged on the other day. once I saw what you had I just started the same arguement, this time with a complete stranger. (sorry!) I was kind of freaking out, trying to figure out what I was going to do when I decided to log on to take my mind off of things, and since I couldnt do it in the profesional world, I guess I chose to vent here (again, sorry!) I dont usualy fly off the handle so easy, or to people at random, just so you know. I was just so angry and it seemed everywhere I looked I was being attacked (bit of a panic attack, I guess) so, again, kinna freaked out there for a sec, sorry to bother you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crystallinus In reply to vendbuy [2010-06-24 21:43:58 +0000 UTC]
I never said that porn does not have artistic value. I'm just saying that it just does not belong to this site in particular. And in no way I am trying to tell others what they should like, it's just an oppinion, I'm not going to punch anyone in the face for having their own oppinions. Stay cool.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
vendbuy In reply to crystallinus [2010-06-25 04:37:06 +0000 UTC]
listen, I tend to get a bit passionate with my ranting, and I had just gotten hung up on while in an arguement about a similar topic right before I logged on the other day. once I saw what you had I just started the same arguement, this time with a complete stranger. (sorry!) I was kind of freaking out, trying to figure out what I was going to do when I decided to log on to take my mind off of things, and since I couldnt do it in the profesional world, I guess I chose to vent here (again, sorry!) I dont usualy fly off the handle so easy, or to people at random, just so you know. I was just so angry and it seemed everywhere I looked I was being attacked (bit of a panic attack, I guess) so, again, kinna freaked out there for a sec, sorry to bother you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
princedirk [2010-06-08 05:46:19 +0000 UTC]
Showing up your ass? I think you mean showing OFF. Showing up would be like "one upping" your ass.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crystallinus In reply to princedirk [2010-06-24 21:44:52 +0000 UTC]
yeah, I'm sorry, I'm not that good at english xD thanks anyway ^^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jiggles1234 [2010-06-02 19:52:58 +0000 UTC]
This is very true, but it is nature as long as you dont make it disgusting and degrating it can turn out to be beautiful thing if you reall think about it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bleedangel [2010-04-23 18:38:26 +0000 UTC]
hey i agree..can you see this: www.artoriginal.deviantart.com
and tell me if I would be wrong If I report him, please.. this is not art, is pornography
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bleedangel In reply to crystallinus [2010-06-26 21:12:37 +0000 UTC]
I think it's porn, but deviantart accept nude pics...But I just think this is not art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ASHAero In reply to bleedangel [2013-01-09 19:38:40 +0000 UTC]
Bleedangel: It's so weird that many have drilled into their head that as soon as someone is nude it means it's pornographic. I suppose to you those on naturist beaches are also part of pornography despite arousal actually being a no-no.
I tend to get hung up about etymology and modern interpretation as well for many things. Pornography is really 'that pertaining to writing or illustrations of prostitutes/prostitution'. Now we have to define prostitution...difficult.
For me pornography has to include sexual intercourse to warrant that definition, basically because I'm asexual and I don't find anything sexually implicit or explicit in nudity.
However, Crystallinus, what you say in your comment, I agree with. That (what you describe) to me seems too rushed and thoughtless to be art.
However when it comes to what others may say about barring nudity completely or saying it ALL is pornographic and not artistic I think is far to restrictive to be included on an art site. It isn't as if there aren't filters in place, what is to complaint about for them?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
bleedangel In reply to ASHAero [2013-01-12 23:09:21 +0000 UTC]
Oh, well, since it's been months I wrote this comment, I have NO ideia of what you're talking about...But once you talked about pornography, I think that art should be treated as such, and then, people who appeals to nudity are weak when not doing a good work... I apreciate a lot of works of nudity, but I don't think you'd understand, because you don't know me...Anyway, I hate nudity beaches, once you said
But anyway, as I said, it's been months since I fave + this stamp, and I don't remember the point of this discussion, and I really believe that as you want to argue and enthuse, you should write a blog, 'cause I see in your words that you're the one kind who likes to defend your point. Do a blog and add me (i'm not being ironic, please).
See yah.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Keikomidorino [2010-04-14 06:58:31 +0000 UTC]
I totally agree. DeviantArt is for showcasing ACTUAL art, not sexual gentitial.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1