Comments: 34
devilsbathtub [2011-08-07 09:58:33 +0000 UTC]
Great background and the physical changes of Jennifer Hulk are nicely done.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Strangerataru [2011-05-10 02:14:05 +0000 UTC]
It is really cool though regardless.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Jose-Ramiro [2011-05-09 02:29:23 +0000 UTC]
Awesome transformation sequence.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
QKStudios [2011-05-03 02:16:00 +0000 UTC]
Really good transitions, especially the top half and the feet.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to QKStudios [2011-05-03 05:34:19 +0000 UTC]
Thank you, tried to focus making it a slow but noticeable progression, not just separate single images
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
75thparellel [2011-05-03 00:56:56 +0000 UTC]
Nicely done!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
AmateurUnleaded In reply to CycKath [2011-05-03 00:08:25 +0000 UTC]
...how did you do it, actually? I'd love to know for my arts.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to AmateurUnleaded [2011-05-03 00:53:06 +0000 UTC]
Its actually just a slightly tweaked version of the Difference Clouds Lightning creation method (white layer, render>clouds, render>difference clouds, invert colors, move midtone level to far right, colorize the hue as required) where I add some extra lines to control the lightning direction slightly and working highlights to get it pop a little more.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Levia-the-Dragon [2011-05-02 17:54:49 +0000 UTC]
Mmm, it does work better all lines up in one, interesting that her panties shredded away but her shorts remained...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to Levia-the-Dragon [2011-05-02 20:58:44 +0000 UTC]
Well, we only see the front ruined, could be a lot more hidden by her new cut-offs...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EchoWing [2011-05-02 17:07:20 +0000 UTC]
Came out pretty good, I'd say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to EchoWing [2011-05-02 20:58:50 +0000 UTC]
Glad you liked it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SHrrrrrriiipfan In reply to CycKath [2011-05-04 02:47:31 +0000 UTC]
What exactly did FMM request, a comic sequence, or just a one-shot?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to SHrrrrrriiipfan [2011-05-04 02:54:52 +0000 UTC]
Jut TF, though most opted for comics. I just pared my down to this and still ran out of time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to SHrrrrrriiipfan [2011-05-05 01:10:14 +0000 UTC]
More delays in getting it were the problem
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CycKath In reply to Titaneer [2011-05-02 12:47:43 +0000 UTC]
Its more the fact it was meant to be done in 2009 and what year is it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
CycKath In reply to Titaneer [2011-05-02 13:04:44 +0000 UTC]
The lack of movement was also intentional, trying to a noticeable progression with the arms rising up
👍: 0 ⏩: 0