HOME | DD
dadrian β Moon stock
#moon #space #planet #resource #rock #stock
Published: 2015-03-16 23:46:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 1768; Favourites: 36; Downloads: 239
Redirect to original
Description
A simple moon, rock, no atmosphere.Free for ANY use, credits not necessary but appreciated. Showing it to me will get you a +fav
This moon will play an important role in my next deviation
This deviation may NOT be used in any racist, sexist or otherwise demeaning images.
Related content
Comments: 13
π: 0 β©: 0
Hi! i used your stock here! ebenewood.deviantart.com/art/F⦠Thank you so so much!!
π: 0 β©: 0
Photoshop 3D?
Just started using it to make a planet
π: 0 β©: 1
Maya.
How's the photoshop 3D planet working out for you? I think it is quite interesting, but photoshops 3D features are not really comfortable to use.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well thus far it has felt awkward to use, but its made a pretty good planet.Β I was able to set up a base texture + bump map + specular map for reflective lakes + an extra outer sphere of clouds.Β It will need raster editing afterwards.Β I think its superior to using the old fashioned spherize filter, but not as good as your badass 3d software.
π: 0 β©: 1
This sounds very promising. It isn't any different from what I do in Maya, except that I can use displacement maps instead of or additional to bump maps.
π: 0 β©: 1
I believe PS has that too, I am not sure what that is though.Β Can you explain the difference?
π: 0 β©: 1
It's best to show the difference:
studiomaven.org/images/4/4b/Buβ¦
A displacement map creates actual geometry, while a bump map fakes it. That makes displacement maps much slower, but the results may be better. The best way is using both, displacement for big features and adding smaller details with bump.
π: 0 β©: 1
Bad link X(
But it makes sense, just use a low resolution displacement map right? to make it faster
π: 0 β©: 1
I edited the comment above, the link works now.
Actually the resolution of the displacement map doesn't make much difference at render time. It's all about the maximum number of subdivisions you allow the displacement to create and that's resolution independent (at least in maya).
π: 0 β©: 1
Ah I see, PS cant do that
Kinda disappointed in it, doesn't look right and there are only a few options.
π: 0 β©: 1
You don't have to though. Especially for planets a bump map works great, for most planets I prefer it to a displacment, because the borders stay smooth. Just for smaller moons and asteroids displacement really makes a difference and that is nothing some PS post work can't fix.
π: 0 β©: 0