Comments: 50
Huggbees [2010-01-30 15:06:30 +0000 UTC]
Fowl in the Shadows is amazing in this one.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Huggbees [2010-01-30 23:56:37 +0000 UTC]
Thanks. Everyone once and I while, I'll realize I haven't done a good "trailer shot" so to speak and one of these panels will happen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
mattcrap [2009-05-13 23:29:49 +0000 UTC]
"...time to kick that habit!"
i almost pissed!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to mattcrap [2009-05-13 23:44:13 +0000 UTC]
Haha! Mission Accomplished.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Springheeled-Jack [2009-05-13 15:49:24 +0000 UTC]
I must admit, I have missed me some Fowl. And you have to hurry up and finish this one so you can write Fargo Fowl!
~D
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Springheeled-Jack [2009-05-13 20:08:14 +0000 UTC]
That one's being pushed back to next winter. I've got a... secret project slated for the summer.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Springheeled-Jack [2009-05-14 16:39:52 +0000 UTC]
Disappointing, I know. Wait'll you see it, though... it make up for everything, I promise.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Springheeled-Jack In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-15 03:37:29 +0000 UTC]
At this rate it better come with a handjob.
I keed, I keed. Long as it comes out before the zombie vampire dolphin apocalypse of 2012, I'll keep readin'.
~D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Deepex007 [2009-05-12 10:29:33 +0000 UTC]
Probably goes without saying but.... another awesome page of Fowl goodness!
Really looking forward to seeing what you have planned with your characters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Deepex007 [2009-05-13 02:14:29 +0000 UTC]
Lots of blunt force trauma and stressful relationships. I am a loving god.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
angiepk [2009-05-10 21:21:39 +0000 UTC]
And what is this?! A Fowl page?! These babies are becomming almost as rare as a page of Mav these days! errr....
Ahem...anyway gorgeous page! Panel three should be a print so I can put it in a frame and hang it on my wall. Absolutely stunning work, Dan. My hat is off to you, or it would be if I was wearing one...or something like that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to angiepk [2009-05-13 01:49:54 +0000 UTC]
Production will step up a bit, I think. For now: thanks for the complimentation.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
angiepk In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-13 20:46:49 +0000 UTC]
We're going to have a kickass new dictionary by the time we're done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Kostmeyer [2009-05-10 19:43:32 +0000 UTC]
I like the way the central scene is framed by the twovigilantes charging at each other. Show's the difference between them and the Fowl too - while they're fighting each other he gets the real job done and takes out the crooks. Good stuff!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Kostmeyer [2009-05-13 03:42:36 +0000 UTC]
Thankyew. There's costumed vigilantes a-plenty in Parris City but, like rock stars and quarterbacks, some are better than others.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
BrattyBen [2009-05-09 08:38:48 +0000 UTC]
Love the bit about the Habit! Nice.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to BrattyBen [2009-05-13 02:18:24 +0000 UTC]
If the Quiver is to be my critique on the mainstream superhero, it had to be done.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
SickZano [2009-05-09 07:47:12 +0000 UTC]
I remember! I remember!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to SickZano [2009-05-13 03:39:33 +0000 UTC]
Cheers, good sir!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CubaNectie [2009-05-09 07:29:26 +0000 UTC]
he's bald! what's not to like?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NuclearConvoy [2009-05-09 05:08:27 +0000 UTC]
Bring on the PUNishment!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
NuclearConvoy In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-13 07:30:40 +0000 UTC]
Awwww, c'mon! It is classic!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Qt75Rx1 [2009-05-09 05:00:19 +0000 UTC]
Anyway, boy, I am sure glad you're back to drawing The Fowl. Was Business school keeping you busy much?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Qt75Rx1 [2009-05-13 03:41:12 +0000 UTC]
Much and then much more. I'm getting my money's worth, yes I am... plus, I had a few secret comic projects on the sly. Haven't forgotten about your filler page, by the bye. Stay tuned.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Qt75Rx1 In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-13 05:28:36 +0000 UTC]
Roger willco.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Qt75Rx1 [2009-05-09 04:58:46 +0000 UTC]
Holy cow, she's packing a KATANA???!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to Qt75Rx1 [2009-05-09 11:58:47 +0000 UTC]
Oh, for sure. 'Cause, y'know. Shit happens.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SabreBash [2009-05-09 04:40:52 +0000 UTC]
Wonderful script, excellent art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to SabreBash [2009-05-09 11:58:07 +0000 UTC]
Wait, I'm supposed to have a SCRIPT for this rag? Damn it! Gotta TELL me these things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MelodicManiac [2009-05-09 04:01:34 +0000 UTC]
Oh, I love these "shit`s about to hit the fan" kind of moments. they just cheer me up, no matter what.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to MelodicManiac [2009-05-13 03:41:25 +0000 UTC]
My pleasure, believe you me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
MelodicManiac In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-14 03:19:18 +0000 UTC]
I believe you, man. Because I know you care.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dan-sch In reply to JonFreeman [2009-05-09 03:50:53 +0000 UTC]
I know, right? Something about wearing a cape...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
literacysuks1 [2009-05-09 03:14:01 +0000 UTC]
Hooray, more fowl.
Do you have more community work lined up after secret war? Because...I mean, I LIKE that stuff, but not at the expense of the work that's totally "yours". Especially when it's this good.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to literacysuks1 [2009-05-09 03:44:38 +0000 UTC]
Nope. After the secret war is over, I'm focusing strictly on that which is MINE. And believe me, come next fall, you'll get a very good idea of what that means...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dan-sch In reply to piotrov [2009-05-09 03:50:15 +0000 UTC]
Awww, screw it. I changed it for the sake of clarity. Thanks for pointing that out.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
piotrov In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-09 06:46:58 +0000 UTC]
No problem, man. I get now what you were going for, dialect-wise. Could work either way, I guess.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dan-sch In reply to piotrov [2009-05-09 03:45:44 +0000 UTC]
I dunno. Say "Able to pull together" out loud and pretend you're from Chicago while you do it and tell me you don't drop the "to."
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
piotrov In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-09 06:38:40 +0000 UTC]
Ah. Good point. I can see that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
jakester2008 [2009-05-09 02:52:33 +0000 UTC]
Damn....he's sneaky. lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dan-sch In reply to jakester2008 [2009-05-09 03:51:08 +0000 UTC]
That he is, sir. That he is...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
jakester2008 In reply to dan-sch [2009-05-09 03:54:33 +0000 UTC]
Just like Batman...except sneakier...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0