Comments: 46
DimmuBorgirmi [2019-12-26 21:56:51 +0000 UTC]
Actually, I'm gonna fave this piece. Whatcha think about that?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Brotherofsteel5 [2019-12-26 08:58:06 +0000 UTC]
That's funny as somes peoples use kids to promote their agenda or manipulate peoples, especially youths.
I don't know why, but Greta Thunberg wimming in UN, remind me the girl who cryed about the fake story of kowetian babies removed from incubators.
And for Greta, where will be the richs supports, the day she will make (for exemple) a depression, or a breakdown, because she will got too much stimulation and public exposition?
I predict, psychologist will got works to do with her in few years.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
TropicTom [2019-11-15 11:13:39 +0000 UTC]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MCsaurus [2019-10-19 22:09:32 +0000 UTC]
Is this a template?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dark-kunoichi92 In reply to MCsaurus [2019-10-19 22:53:36 +0000 UTC]
It’s a popular template. I found it on Google Images.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dark-kunoichi92 In reply to MCsaurus [2019-10-20 02:48:48 +0000 UTC]
Just look up “facts meme” on Google Images, and it’ll take you right there.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
astrologer342 [2019-10-09 19:20:01 +0000 UTC]
As one with that and adhd, I can blankly tell a lie and a truth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dwaters220 [2019-10-09 18:34:24 +0000 UTC]
As a man with Aspergers himself, I wholeheartedly agree with this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
UltramanZenith [2019-09-29 22:56:05 +0000 UTC]
I completely agree. Her parents and teachers have brainwashed her into doing this, and AOC is promoting it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Shadowstalker55 [2019-09-29 05:12:59 +0000 UTC]
Wait a second. It’s the leftist’s fault for her getting bullied? Okay, whether you agree with her or not or if you think she was indoctrinated, I blame the bullies themselves for smearing her in the first place. The ones picking on her are the ones with the real problem, picking on a little girl for speaking her mind on certain issues. The kid should not be bullied. Plus, it’s not only the left, the right is also doing the same thing with Kyle Kashuv, for their pro-gun narrative and one could say the very same thing about him as much as Greta Thunberg.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chaser1992 [2019-09-29 03:59:37 +0000 UTC]
Using kids to push a political agenda is pretty shady.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DanTEHMan2001 [2019-09-27 14:43:52 +0000 UTC]
That's the truth, Alexis!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Terrarian-Warrior [2019-09-27 13:57:31 +0000 UTC]
They're basically brownshirting the children. Another reason why we see the (Now Far) Left has become the modern day Nazi party. Another reason why we need to wipe scum like AOC and Soros off the face of the earth. Another reason why the Left needs SERIOUS reform, just like Islam.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
KandaHaruka [2019-09-26 19:37:52 +0000 UTC]
Children with Aspergers shouldn't be manipulated into politics anyway.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
solidus598 [2019-09-26 19:28:43 +0000 UTC]
Call me an alarmist. But, I think the phenomenon is actually true. A good example to look at is Jakarta, that city is sinking, albeit at a slow rate, but not any less of a reason to be cautious. Granted, the rate its going at is pretty exaggeratet, but that's the nature of research. Its a constantly evolving subject.
Alas, I still do worry about large scale natural disasters happening that destroy alot of the Earth, but we will never now until that time comes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Tsuki222 [2019-09-26 17:29:00 +0000 UTC]
No, the climate change was not proven "false" by science, and not "many times". No reputable scientist ever stated that.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_…
Did you ever heard of something called the "ice age" in the past?
The discussion is about human caused climate change, and really no it also wasn't proven to be false, and not many times. People it's discussed and/or doubted, and by the minority of scientists, specifically those here:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_…
(And yes, that might seem much, but there are many, many more scientists supporting the idea of the mainstream scientific about Climate Change, with lots of research done to support it.)
The serious argument about climate change, is if it's effects are that what is discussed by mainstream scientific view on climate change, and if they will be as severe, and/or that climate change is cyclical, but even that doesn't exclude humanity in part causing the current climate change - you certainly know the saying "adding fuel to fire"?
It's also far from only "leftists" are believing in human caused climate change. And as for criticizing the the supposed political agenda of this, you yourself are talking here from a politically motivated position, seeing your "Honestly, you lefties are terrible when it comes to children."
And really, it's anti-SJWs and many conservatives who at least arguably drive people to haras and attack Greta, by makings thousands of videos and articles full of non constructive criticism of her and her parents, (and full accusations, often half truths), and many, maybe even majority people harassing her, are of Anti-SJWs views, (at least not declared) Alt Right views. And to be clear, if the Anti-SJWs and the Right aren't guilty for harassing the 8 year old, by your own logic, so isn't the left. (And I mean, CERTAINLY this 8 year old girl on her own came up with this, and wasn't motivated by her elders to do this...who am kidding, as opposed to Greta it's sure someone else motivated her, and "used her"- the girl is just 8 - yet you don't criticize the parents of the 8 year old, for using, or allowing their kid to be used by another person or people for their political agenda. Double standard much?)
Greta is also 16 not 6, 8 or 10 - you are really acting very patronizing (even once doing right after writing that you "know that Greta Thunberg is a smart girl that can speak for herself"), and removing her agency by stating (even for sure) those aren't views of her own, only is manipulated and used. Covington kids are of a similar age - are they also manipulated by adults? But I guess 16 year old girls are infantile to have a will of their own...
The same about David Hogg (who was one month from 18 when he started his activism), you are patronizing towards, and state you think he has no will of his own, that he is just tool, just because he has Asperger's syndrome. In general making it sound you think (young) people with Asperger's syndrome (ie like Greta and David), have no will of their own.
Dark-Kunoichi, do you realize this makes you sound at least kinda ableist?
(Also, the MAGA students did attend the pro-life rally, unless you mean something else than this .)
With being opposed to Doomsday rhetoric, I guess you are also opposed by this logic to QAnon, and the Christian idea of Rapture? Seeing both are visibly more debunked (with rapture being a fairly recent dogma , originating in 1833 and not even supported by the Bible , with John Nelson Darby essentially it's inventor having to edit Bible to fit his new dogma), and ruined many lives ? With the Rapture being teached to children?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dark-kunoichi92 In reply to Tsuki222 [2019-09-26 23:47:29 +0000 UTC]
Sorry I took so long to reply, I was at work and I didn’t have time to read through all your paragraphs, and I just got home.
Anyway, here are my 3 biggest concerns regarding your statement:
- Yes, I know that they’re teenagers, not elementary school kids, but where I live, anyone under 18 is still considered a child. Teens can discuss politics amongst themselves, with people they’re own age, but when actual politicians who are well past the age of 30 start to shove them in front of hundreds of TV broadcast cameras for the whole world to see, and treat their word as God, it becomes very creepy and cultish.
- Yes, I am aware that there are people on social media who legitimately bully people like Greta for their appearances and mental disorders (I even called them “alt-right douchebags” in my rant), which is why I blame her asshole parents and AOC for dragging her into this, because they’re grown ass adults who know how social media works, so they should’ve known this would happen to poor Greta!
- Here’s the full story on the Covington incident, if you want to know what REALLY happened: m.youtube.com/watch?v=lSkpPaiU…
- Also, Nathan Phillips is a phony and a criminal: m.youtube.com/watch?v=BZEkwPLP…
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tsuki222 In reply to dark-kunoichi92 [2019-09-27 17:07:07 +0000 UTC]
So by this, I guess you condemn the parents of the 8 year old parodying Ocasio-Cortez? Seeing it's at least incredibly improbable it was her idea, and she rather couldn't film and upload it herself? As it was a clear political move, with which they exposed their daughter, to the vengeful side of the internet.
The thing with Greta's "parents" using her - I thought you were against accusations without evidence, and the internet court of justice? I mean there is no real evidence they are using Greta, or pushing her, including not even corroborated testimony.
With Greta being in media - being active in political, it near impossible to not become recognized by media, including one such as is fighting for environment (even if it, and including believing in human caused climate change, or it's denial-ism, got aligned on right-left political spectrum as an after effect, but that's another discussion)
I myself think tha in fact many of Right and Anti-SJWs, and a lot or maybe even majority of people criticizing Greta and her parents, and Greta being used, would support her, and say the parents brought her up great, if Greta stated an Anti-SJW or right wing agenda.
I base this on something tying back to David Hogg - as opposite to him, another survivor, the (then) 16 year old Kyle Kashuv, became an activist against gun control, and a right wing and Anti-SJW media darling:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyle_Kas…
www.vox.com/2018/4/18/17207458…
Kyle He’s visited Washington, met President Trump and Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, and made multiple appearances on Fox News. Here is him speaking on the 2019th NRA-ILA Leadership Forum , from the NRA's youtube channel.
So would you say Kyle Kashuv is also used by NRA and conservatives, including Trump? As I didn't see conservative media or Anti-SJWs say that...hmmm.
I can get more your criticism of Ocasio-Cortez, but this is something all or many politics do. As I mentioned above, Trump did it with Kyle Kashuv, and he also invited another teen to the White House for media attention and to gather support.
With the Covington Kids, I only meant they were part of the Pro-Life march- which the video even says. The whole altercation was after the official marches/rallies ended.
To be clear though, I agree the whole situation was started by the Black "Israelites", who are a hate group and black supremacists. If anything they should get (negative) media attention.
I agree the situation was also blown out of proportion by the centrist and liberal media, especially towards Nick Sandmann (seeing how how he was the most calm during the whole situation), although I think the actions of his schoolmates were a bit inconsiderate (ie the Tomahawk chop, even if just made for humor, is not the wisest thing to do in this situation)
I didn't know really much about Nathan Phillips, but yikes, he did falsely claim to be a Vietnam vet, and latter tried to back out of that. With his military career being indeed far from glorious, with his numerous times going AWOL.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
dark-kunoichi92 In reply to Tsuki222 [2019-09-27 18:22:06 +0000 UTC]
You make a good point about Mini AOC. I doubt those skits were her ideas, but still, there’s a difference between making fun of politics and scaring the crap out of people for the sake of politics.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Tsuki222 In reply to dark-kunoichi92 [2019-09-27 18:32:17 +0000 UTC]
Well, it's really only "scaring the crap out of people for the sake of politics", if one if one doesn't believe in human caused climate change, or climate change at all.
But as I wrote above, the scientific consensus on climate change is, that there is human caused climate change:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientif…
Also check out the surveys of scientists' views on climate change .
(This also why I wrote that your notion that climate change was "scientifically proven to be false multiple times" is incorrect.)
And this is why the definition on wikipedia of climate change denialism is "Climate change denial, or global warming denial is denial, dismissal, or unwarranted doubt that contradicts the scientific consensus on climate change, including the extent to which it is caused by humans, its impacts on nature and human society, or the potential of adaptation to global warming by human actions." (with sources on page, for this, like this ).
And to be clear - climate change denialism can itself be argued as politically motivated - seeing that people fighting with climate change, are often allied with the left the first place, as right wing politicians are so often climate change deniers (especially in USA).
But yes, there is a difference between the two examples - the mini AOC sketches are solely or mostly political, while the the fight against climate change isn't, and is largely political at all is such as a byproduct.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
D34DP00LF4N [2019-09-26 15:55:33 +0000 UTC]
PREACH, SISTAH! PREACH!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Miss-Barker [2019-09-26 15:13:37 +0000 UTC]
Amen.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1