JanecShannon [2012-03-05 18:45:58 +0000 UTC]
Overall
Vision
Originality
Technique
Impact
I love the mention of children throwing themselves off benches after proclaiming themselves fakes. That's just the sort of thing that children would do. However, I would write some reaction in from the parents. I don't think they would all have a blanket reaction of not caring at all. Some of them would hush the children up and tell them to stop. Whether from a sense of "Don't speak ill of the dead" or from a simple distaste for remembering it at all (Sherlock ended up with a huge following, a lot of people were taken in by Sherlock's "lies". There would be a good chunk of people out there who would prefer to forget the entire event at all then remember they were stupid enough to fall for it.)
You need to work on varying your sentence structure a bit, however. You have a lot of "He did this. She did that. Then this happened." sort of thing. For instance:
Mrs. Hudson patted his shoulder and checked his forehead for a fever. Then as she returned to the kitchen, John heard dimly, "Oh, Greg, it's no use any longer. We must get him medical help!"
Then he heard Lestrade's voice. "No, we can't. He'll say no. You know he hates having to depend on people."
Do you see what I mean? It probably wouldn't hurt to add a view adjectives and adverbs in.
Instead of:Mrs. Hudson patted his shoulder and checked his forehead for a fever.
You could say: Mrs. Hudson patted his shoulder gently with one hand while her other brushed cool fingers against his forehead checking for a fever.
This could have been a possible place to switch over to Mrs. Hudson's perspective as well. By this time, you've made your point with John and the conversation in the kitchen might be better expressed from someone actually involved in it. Especially since you don't really give much (if any) reaction from John to what they're saying from that point on anyway.
Which is understandable, he's rather focused on other things (like breathing) at that point. Even for several minutes after something like that you tend to keep a bit of tunnel vision. Things that don't directly affect you can seem a bit muffled or distant (in the past I've had issues with hyperventilating as opposed to not being able to breath at all but I'm assuming it's probably fairly similar. Also, it might not be the same for everyone).
I liked the fact that you divided Sherlock's section entirely from the rest of it and that you never actually say that it's him. You've kept it short, sweet, and to the point. Enough to confirm what probably everyone suspected (that the cabbie was Sherlock) and to show that he, too, is hurting from the separation.
I do have a hard time imagining Sherlock calling her "poor, sweet Molly". Even the more emotional Sherlock we see in series 2 would shy away from such a sentimental word as sweet. But you're obviously setting yourself up for a prequel (which is good, it means you have a plan) presumably using that as a title (which is interesting).
Overall, I think it was fairly well written. Something to focus on would be to sound more like your telling me a story and a bit less like you're reading off a timeline of events (something that you started well with but gradually did less and less). Some of your ideas were very unique though. The children, for instance; I haven't really read anything like that in anyone else's stories.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0