Comments: 26
PeinMartyn [2016-02-08 20:56:28 +0000 UTC]
When I was reading, I was imagining that when he took out part of his soul, parts of his body disappeared and so I was thinking that that was the reason he had holes in his hands... My theory of your theories in a story XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to PeinMartyn [2016-02-08 21:23:56 +0000 UTC]
That's the idea I had in a way. Its more he exacted part of his soul through his hands instead of directly through his chest (because that may kill him if done wrong)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz [2015-12-16 04:13:06 +0000 UTC]
It has some interesting theories in it. Including the skelebros' origin.
Very nice.
But yes, lots of grammar mistakes.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-16 04:39:17 +0000 UTC]
Yea I kind of figure that them being the only skeletons that maybe they came from the dead humans, who knows
XD yea I started to notice some grammar mistakes as well just so lazy to fix =3= I will fix them tomorrow...maybe >.>
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-16 04:56:54 +0000 UTC]
XD Maybe.
Well, there is an actual theory that Sans used to be a human.
And if he is and Papyrus isn't, then it supports my theory that the bros aren't bros by blood, but see each other as a brother cause that's how close they are to each other.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-16 05:38:48 +0000 UTC]
If it was more realistic I would say by their bone structures they really don't seem similar at all and they could very well not be related by 'blood' but since its no way realistic its hard to tell lol.
I'm heard seen the theory that Sans was a human, which in my opinion doesn't make sense. I know my theory say he was a human but mine is more the body he uses was once human no him directly. But I'm not sure why people think Sans was once human but not Papyrus O.o
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-16 06:03:33 +0000 UTC]
Well, that may be. But humans who are blood related can be completely different structure-wise: just means they got different genes from their parents.
In either case, we can only truly rely on what they say to and about each other, and what others say about them.
Yeah, I don't really get why people seem to overlook the fact that, if the bros are blood-related and Sans was once human, then Papyrus would then have been human too.
But yeah! Your theory touches on that one, but doesn't dive into it entirely, which is nice.
There's also a theory that Gaster's soul was split and it made them, which is something else you touched upon. I've only seen it one other place, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-16 06:12:02 +0000 UTC]
True true, the only real way we would know if Toby himself said so.
Well I kind of figure if they are truly the only skeletons where did they come from? And human do have skeletons so why not come from a human? Also they never actually met any of the other humans they came before Frisk so it even more possible that their bodies were once the humans. Also you never actually see the dead body in the casks so some of them might not even have a body O.O Just a theory anyways lol
Well the only reason I see it as a thing it because if he 'created' them and the weren't birth somehow that they would need something to actually bring them to life. Seeing how souls plays a huge part in making a someone who they are I could only assume he would use a soul. And I doubt other would willing give some of their soul for the experiment I'm sure he used his own. Some scientist tend to use themselves in their experiments so why not Gaster.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-16 06:18:51 +0000 UTC]
Eggsactly!
XD Oh my goodness, the talks people have had with roleplaying Papyrusses and the comics about humans having skeletons in them... Too precious! XD
O_O Oh. My goodness. What if that's why the game doesn't let you look in the coffins? Cause there're no dead bodies in them! Or if they're all deformed and whatnot because of experiments that Gaster had performed on them!
This is very true.
That's actually the basic premise of the movie 9, and how the stitchpunks were able to be alive.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-16 06:31:39 +0000 UTC]
I love the comic of Papyrus and Sans seeing Halloween decorations of skeletons lol priceless XD
That's what I thought as well. They don't let you get to them because they are empty! O.O
Yup so it makes sense in that regard but them again maybe they were birth somehow and never even created the world may never know. But that's the fun part is not knowing and making up your own theories :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-16 06:54:07 +0000 UTC]
Haven't seen that one! Where can- pleasedon'ttellmeit'sontumblr.
Yup! That's one of the great things about Undertale: just enough to have theories, but not enough to solve them.
Though, I wonder what Game Theorists are gonna do for it (cause you know they're bound to do a theory on it!).
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-16 07:16:52 +0000 UTC]
I'm not sure where I saw it at lol I look up fanart everywhere so it could have literally been anywhere or everywhere. If i find it I will link it to you.
They may do multiple times of theories and see which one everyone like and what not. I love to see all the different theories out there, it make it more fun even after the game if over :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-20 04:20:58 +0000 UTC]
Alrighty!
They might. Actually, if this hype continues I wouldn't be at all surprised.
Cause, while this game isn't as story-theory-heavy as FNaF, it does have its fair share of detail theories: Undyne's eye, Mettaton's origins, what Sans is, etc.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-20 04:54:53 +0000 UTC]
I think where is doesn't really talk about the past give many people theory ideas of what happened before Frisk. With FNaF they talked about some things in the past but never explained anything lol XD I also think the creators do that on purpose for our amusement.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-20 05:41:59 +0000 UTC]
XD True.
Also like FNaF, there are stories and hints as to what happened in the past.
But that's pretty much where the similarities end. Except that there are characters in it that fans attach themselves to.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-20 05:48:54 +0000 UTC]
Very true lol. But I like how Undertale has a who future to explore were FNaF exhausted its in #3 :/ Which is another reason why I think its going to last a while longer than FNaF did lol
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-20 06:17:23 +0000 UTC]
Quite possibly.
FNaF hype lasted about a year and a half. Undertale's lasted... almost 2 months now? And people keep finding more things to talk about, explore, and draw about.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-20 06:28:35 +0000 UTC]
I think despite Undertale being a short little pixel game, its going to last quite a while in the fandom world. FNaF stay around a long time because of sequels, without sequels I think it would have died off a lot sooner.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-21 01:43:11 +0000 UTC]
It would've also not had such a deep story to it, either.
I think so, too. Hopefully at least until this sudden Star Wars craze blows over.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
256NatLiz In reply to Demonic-Mutt [2015-12-22 02:56:20 +0000 UTC]
Yeah, so do I.
Most of my college friends are big Star Wars fans, though.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Demonic-Mutt In reply to 256NatLiz [2015-12-22 21:35:23 +0000 UTC]
Its good to see people out there who like the same things as me :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0