Comments: 8
artmantou [2011-03-26 18:30:07 +0000 UTC]
cool
š: 0 ā©: 0
coreyh2 [2010-11-12 02:21:03 +0000 UTC]
Like Sqarr said some of the colors aren't usable but I'm sure you could just show this to any colorist and he'd be able to copy the basic style.
Personally I like high saturation and was disappointed when I learned it didn't really print. I'm used to the colors used in old video games.
š: 0 ā©: 1
DerecDonovan In reply to coreyh2 [2010-11-12 15:39:05 +0000 UTC]
Cool thanks for comments, next purchase Spyder monitor Calibrator- *Inkblotzart* wish I could but they don't listen to a word I say about who I work with, best of luck
š: 0 ā©: 1
EagleGosselin [2010-11-11 22:05:31 +0000 UTC]
The blues you've got on Wolverine and what you've got on the windows in the background are impossible to print in CMYK and I'm getting gamut warnings all over the page. The yellow on Wolverine grabs the eye much too violently compared to everything else.
Personally, if I saw this printed, I'd feel the colourist hadn't done the strength and solidity of your lineart any justice. Compared to all the time it took you to plan, thumbnail, draw and ink this spread, it would just take a competent colourist maybe half an hour to get it to look like this after the flats got done. They just wouldn't be earning Marvel-grade pay.
š: 0 ā©: 0
ChrisSummersArts [2010-11-11 17:52:13 +0000 UTC]
Dude get me on a book for you and I will make it look just like that for ya!!!
I'm serious.
š: 0 ā©: 0
wolfprime [2010-11-11 16:43:45 +0000 UTC]
It looks GREAT DĀ²!
But . . . it looks like what most comics would consider flats. Not a fan of shadows on the figures? I see the gradients and added textures in the backgrounds, but not so much on the figures . . .
I like it though! And it's pretty on par to what I saw in Connor Hawke . . . if memory serves . . .
š: 0 ā©: 0