Comments: 20
econic-media [2008-03-21 00:27:27 +0000 UTC]
You said you were looking for composition help, so here it goes:
I would have taken the picture straight from above (it seems taking at an angle now) and use the 'rule of thirds' ([link] ) making it look like [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
agod2some [2007-10-21 02:46:53 +0000 UTC]
This is just gorgeous. I can almost smell it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Rammstein13 [2007-10-17 00:44:47 +0000 UTC]
Great macro shot. Very good showing all of the detail.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wreck-design [2007-10-12 11:30:53 +0000 UTC]
It looks like milk chocolate YUM!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nadineada [2007-10-12 01:18:19 +0000 UTC]
simple, yet elegant and beautiful. it would look gorgeous as a card or something. nice shot!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
SilverEagleOwl [2007-10-09 14:33:15 +0000 UTC]
A nice picture. There's nothing at all wrong with floral/macro shots and you've got some good ones there.... A tripod or monopod is a good idea, but I find I get some great pictures even when I forget my tripod. You can always look for something steady and handy (railings, rocks, tree stumps) to support your camera. Keep up the nice work!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
chilipalmer [2007-10-08 13:10:25 +0000 UTC]
Love the subject, but I think the composition would be a little better with the centre of the rose slightly off centre of the frame. I read a comment above about focusing, have you considered using a tripod and manual focus?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PunkNJunk [2007-10-07 21:36:36 +0000 UTC]
I have the tendancy of taking alot of flower pics when I have nothing left to photograph aswell.
Very nice picture, reminds me of a wedding.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RockLou [2007-10-07 10:43:11 +0000 UTC]
Awesome! So beautiful, and like crudd said, it's still very simplistic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
cruddpuppet [2007-10-07 04:17:46 +0000 UTC]
Very simplistic yet complex.
Do you just take your camera up close to the top of the rose or something?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1