Comments: 24
Dynamoe [2013-07-10 03:25:07 +0000 UTC]
Budweiser was bought out by a Belgian company not too long ago. Why that sale didn't stay in country is beyond me! Smithfield Foods was recently sold to a Chinese company.
Why are we doing this?
π: 0 β©: 0
Cloudwilk [2012-10-21 00:12:34 +0000 UTC]
I definetly agree with insourcing.
π: 0 β©: 1
Garveate [2012-10-19 20:26:53 +0000 UTC]
I feel that the traditional American manufacturing jobs are lost. People frequently talk about lowering the corporate tax rate and losing the regulations, but there is little talk about corporate patriotism. Corporate patriotism does not seem to exist. We will never have a lower cost of doing business or fewer regulations than a third world country or predatory developed nations. We are one of the most developed countries in the world and our citizens have a higher standard of living. The only way we can save our manufacturing jobs is to create new areas of manufacturing and increase education. We need areas that canβt be outsourced because we are the main source. Obama is trying to do this with green jobs just as previous presidents built the highway system and our electrical grid. It is clear that it is not financially beneficial to corporations to mix patriotism with business sensibility. So yes it is up to the government (perhaps with corporate partnership) to pull us out of this hole.
π: 0 β©: 1
DarkSnarkArtie89 [2012-10-19 02:56:37 +0000 UTC]
Providing more manufacturing and engineering jobs in the US would also help improve the education, since these jobs need workers who are smart enough to know what they're doing. Plus, it also makes the more corporate jobs run efficiently, since they don't have to deal with all the barriers created by outsourcing such as employees needing to learn several different languages, cultural barriers, and diplomatic issues.
And this means you can actually export with the global economy with a sense of pride.... Which everyone values in the end.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dionaya In reply to DarkSnarkArtie89 [2013-01-17 19:03:46 +0000 UTC]
I agree entirely. There are also countless logistic benefits to insourcing. Namely, significantly reduced transportation costs.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dionaya In reply to Taxbane [2012-03-30 20:01:45 +0000 UTC]
your point B is something that the US government doesn't seem to realize. If they provide no incentive for corporations to keep their jobs in the US, corporations are going to look out for their own profits and outsource!
π: 0 β©: 0
revilnemesis3 [2012-03-29 02:07:01 +0000 UTC]
Yes, this would be pure win.
π: 0 β©: 1
Dionaya In reply to Dionaya [2012-03-29 02:09:48 +0000 UTC]
Ack, I mean execution. >.<
π: 0 β©: 0
RhetoricHaystack [2012-03-14 21:47:52 +0000 UTC]
yes! i complete agreely!
π: 0 β©: 1
LS-Jebus [2012-02-16 19:49:07 +0000 UTC]
I think "insourcing" is important for all nations. If your country can produce what you need, then use that capability.
It at first seems like a good idea to outsource to China for cheap labour, but by doing that you kill jobs and those people now have to turn to the service industry, making $8 an hour. It makes the corporations wealthier, but the populace poorer. Who cares about cheaper goods at Walmart if you make $20,000 less than before?
π: 0 β©: 1
marktwospirit [2012-02-16 17:35:25 +0000 UTC]
A plant I worked for went out of business because of outsourcing. This is good for our country, thank you.
π: 0 β©: 1
CleverConveyence [2012-02-16 15:03:02 +0000 UTC]
wow, a decent submission on the DAPFC group. A great one, even.
π: 0 β©: 1
Vena-Durhaeva [2012-02-16 02:59:31 +0000 UTC]
*applause*
You ought to put this on a shirt, yaknow.
π: 0 β©: 0