HOME | DD

Distantstarr β€” Ninjas coming (Black Widow II and Gray Ghost)

Published: 2012-04-29 13:35:24 +0000 UTC; Views: 9450; Favourites: 176; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Ninjas Coming
A couple of YF-23 with their sexy curvy lines, passing over gorgeous snowy mountains. I hope you like it. Comments are welcomed.


"YF-23 was an American single-seat, twin-engine fighter aircraft designed for the United States Air Force (USAF). The design was a finalist in the USAF's Advanced Tactical Fighter (ATF) competition, battling the Lockheed YF-22 for a production contract. Two YF-23 prototypes were built with the nicknames "Black Widow II" and "Gray Ghost". Wiki

Related content
Comments: 78

Meema [2014-10-23 04:14:35 +0000 UTC]

I really wish this had won out over the F-22.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

huxley75 [2014-03-25 23:05:27 +0000 UTC]

I always thought the Northrop design looked better than the YF-22.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to huxley75 [2014-03-26 08:58:14 +0000 UTC]

I personally think the F-22A to be more beautiful, but this one looks futuristic at certain angles. But looking at it from the top makes it seem like a plate

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 0

Kiba928 [2014-03-10 12:18:20 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Kiba928 [2014-03-10 17:22:10 +0000 UTC]

thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

comicfann [2014-02-26 14:52:25 +0000 UTC]

wow man looks amazing! i preferred the black widow over the raptor why don't they offer this to america's allies?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to comicfann [2014-02-26 17:25:23 +0000 UTC]

top secret technology, can't leave the country!

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

comicfann In reply to Distantstarr [2014-03-01 08:18:05 +0000 UTC]

haha yeah but what about the f-35?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to comicfann [2014-03-01 17:40:22 +0000 UTC]

tech in F-35 can pass to allies, as it is not as advanced as the F-22A

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

comicfann In reply to Distantstarr [2014-03-02 15:43:53 +0000 UTC]

ok

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

ryanwolf06 [2014-02-23 18:24:46 +0000 UTC]

The YF-23 was faster and stealthier than the YF-22, but the F-22 was picked for better maneuverability.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to ryanwolf06 [2014-02-23 19:08:18 +0000 UTC]

I heard so too, in addition to some Lockheed influence in the political echelon.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S7alker117 [2014-02-23 14:52:48 +0000 UTC]

I still think this one would make an awesome strike fighter to support the F-22. Looks and feels more "right" than the 35, but that's just an opinion.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to S7alker117 [2014-02-23 16:23:03 +0000 UTC]

The F-35 is supposed to replace the F-16, A-10 and the F-18, as a striker, but the YF-23 was developed as an air superiority fighter fitted mostly for air-air missions, so I do not think it could replace the fat F-35. It has some sexy curves, I agree with you, but I like the F-22 more

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 2

comicfann In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-26 14:57:35 +0000 UTC]

but think about it how can the F-35 replace the A-10? it's just stupid nd i head us is reducing their army's strength? and also cutting off its A-10 squadrons?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to comicfann [2014-02-26 17:24:11 +0000 UTC]

it is about stealth, new tech!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

comicfann In reply to Distantstarr [2014-03-01 08:21:14 +0000 UTC]

still not fearsome as the A-10 and it just can't replace the A-10!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

PaganiZondaFroadster In reply to comicfann [2014-03-06 07:11:18 +0000 UTC]

"The USAF had considered replacing theΒ A-10 Β with the F-35B, but will not do so due to the F-35B inability to generate enough sorties."

- from Wikipedia

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

S7alker117 In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-24 15:13:20 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, I'm aware of that. But some studies were made a few years ago which considered the possibility of adapting the basic F-23 design for the strike fighter role, has the aircraft possesses a rather large weapons bay.

With that said, I do agree with you, the Raptor has better curves and it's an all-around better plane, but it doesn't hurt to imagine how it would be to have both birds flying and supporting each other.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to S7alker117 [2014-02-24 16:57:05 +0000 UTC]

I actually have not heard about the F-35's weapon bays being big, I only heard that it was too fat/over stuffed with technological equipments in order to fulfil the role it is expected to do. But I read an article the other day, which says the F-22 must hang around because the F-35 cannot defend itself without the F-22. But I understand your point

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-24 18:17:51 +0000 UTC]

Oh, no the F-35's bay is rather small, holds two bombs and two AIM-120s (at leats util re-designed AIM-120s come into service). The F-23 is the one with a large bay: yf-23.net/Pics/Plans/PAV1%20we…

That's why it was considered for the strike role a few years ago.

The F-35 only carries a truly heavy payload with external stores. And, yes, the F-35 can't defend itself. It does have sensors and modern weapons but doesn't have the acceleration and speed to make dash and run strikes or to simply flee. It's a flying brick, unfortunatelly.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to S7alker117 [2014-02-24 19:46:05 +0000 UTC]

oh, sorry! i miss read your comment. got you now

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

S7alker117 In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-24 20:12:09 +0000 UTC]

No problem.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

TheFellowWithTheHat [2014-02-22 15:54:17 +0000 UTC]

If only I knew things about planes.


Then these pictures would probably get me more happy than; "Wow. Such Realism. Much amaze. Wow."


Yet again another deceptively realistic piece of art. c:

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to TheFellowWithTheHat [2014-02-22 18:31:34 +0000 UTC]

thank you my friend, Sir.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

WhiteWolf--84 [2014-02-22 11:26:33 +0000 UTC]

It's a beautiful design, it's a shame that the YF-22 beat it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to WhiteWolf--84 [2014-02-22 14:09:21 +0000 UTC]

from this angle it looks especially sexy

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

WhiteWolf--84 In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-23 02:13:32 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, it does.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

CarrieMoore [2014-02-22 10:25:28 +0000 UTC]

One of the best looking stealth aircraft IMO, shame it wasn't chosen. It was stealthier than the F-22, but was slightly more expensive.Β 

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to CarrieMoore [2014-02-22 14:09:48 +0000 UTC]

To be honest, I like the F-22 more

πŸ‘: 1 ⏩: 1

CarrieMoore In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-22 19:38:07 +0000 UTC]

I can see why.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to CarrieMoore [2014-02-23 00:54:28 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

legendofspyroXcynder [2014-02-22 09:41:31 +0000 UTC]

for no reason I hate this plane's design.....
had great handling and such, but I find it a serious pain when I try dodging some missiles


of course I'm talking about AC 5
BTW did you heard about Ace Combat Infinity?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to legendofspyroXcynder [2014-02-22 14:10:25 +0000 UTC]

Yes I heard about the infinity, but was travelling and could not play the beta. Did you play the beta?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

legendofspyroXcynder In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-22 19:13:48 +0000 UTC]

stupid Sony can't let me into their store to download it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to legendofspyroXcynder [2014-02-23 00:54:18 +0000 UTC]

hmmm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

warrior1944 [2014-02-22 07:55:11 +0000 UTC]

Awesome creation once again Hmm in my opinion they could had taken both F22 and F23 into production, America have a lack of fighter planes in the future compared to how it was like before with only F 22 and the so far disappointing F 35.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to warrior1944 [2014-02-22 14:10:50 +0000 UTC]

Thank you my friend. Glad you like it

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Midway2009 [2014-02-22 07:06:02 +0000 UTC]

Awesome fighters! Shame they weren't chosen.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Midway2009 [2014-02-22 14:11:17 +0000 UTC]

They are cool jets

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Midway2009 In reply to Distantstarr [2014-02-22 18:12:12 +0000 UTC]

Indeed!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to Midway2009 [2014-02-22 18:31:15 +0000 UTC]

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jsoed [2014-01-19 05:07:30 +0000 UTC]

Cool pic and great title!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to jsoed [2014-01-19 16:57:14 +0000 UTC]

thank you

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

megafreak12329 [2013-06-28 04:12:08 +0000 UTC]

F-23: "I forgots how to airplane" XD

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

dinobatfan [2012-09-14 07:18:06 +0000 UTC]

Ohhh I like this a lot!! The YF-23 was always such a great looking plane. It's a shame more wasn't done with it.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to dinobatfan [2012-09-14 09:07:19 +0000 UTC]

I won't lie to you. I only like the cockpit/front part of this plane but not the rest of it. The raptor is more aerodynamic and looks sexier from multiple angles

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

dinobatfan In reply to Distantstarr [2012-09-15 09:21:09 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate your honesty here. I do like the F-22 Raptor, but for me there is just a sexier, spacier, more futuristic look to the F-23 that I like. While I do like the F-22, to me it always looks like an updated stealthier F-15. Now, this isn't meant as an insult or a bad thing or a slouch to the F-15. Because I love the F-15 and think it's an awesome looking an overall outstanding a plane too with a great history behind it. I just think the F-23 was a much more unique looking a plane, and did seem to have a lot to offer, and it was always just a shame someone didn't do more with it ala what happened with the "losing " competitor in the YF-16, YF-17 competition that produced both the excellent F-16 and F-18 series of aircraft. I do know a bomber version of the YF-23 was proposed, again it's just too bad it went nowhere.

Well, even though you're not that fond of the F-23, even more kudos to you for making such a wonderful looking a portrait of what it might have looked like operationally. My hat's off to you in much gratitude. Take care and much more happy creating to you!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

Distantstarr In reply to dinobatfan [2012-09-15 14:31:56 +0000 UTC]

thank you sooo much

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

BTR90 [2012-09-02 23:12:46 +0000 UTC]

chuck fucking noris!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>