HOME | DD

divaficaGlass
Published: 2012-10-21 16:27:34 +0000 UTC; Views: 6164; Favourites: 327; Downloads: 1022
Redirect to original
Description I always laugh when you refer to me as glass.
Not just because of the way you say it,
(glass-as-in-gas).
Or because I know it's a crack at my fragility.


Glass is pure.
I am like granite -
my body nullified from too many clashing traits.

Glass is transparent.
I am like clay -
illegible from all the plastered smiles.

Glass is unyielding.
I am like chalk -
easily broken and scuffed away by meagre things.


Glass is hung up on walls and in great cathedrals,
tinted for enhancement, but only ever painted on by fools.

I am hidden behind keypads and camera lenses,
coated in a thick paste of deceptiveness.


No, my love,
I was never glass.  (Despite my fragility)
Call me granite or clay or chalk
and be done with me.
Related content
Comments: 79

divafica In reply to ??? [2013-01-20 11:51:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Syfrax In reply to divafica [2013-01-20 13:27:42 +0000 UTC]

It's the truth from my point of view

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MagicalJoey [2012-11-08 14:50:01 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


I will be critiquing this piece on behalf of
a.deviantart.net/avatars/s/u/s… " alt=" " title="SuperWritersHelp" />

Firstly, I love the way you draw the reader in with your first ST by explaining the 'glass-as-in-gas' pronunciation.

Now, the crit:e.deviantart.net/emoticons/b/b… " width="10" height="10" alt="" title="Bullet; Red"/> ST = Stanza
e.deviantart.net/emoticons/b/b… " width="10" height="10" alt="" title="Bullet; Red"/> L = Line
ST 1, L4 - 'either' isn't needed here because you have just started a new sentence and are not comparing the crack to anything else yet.

ST 5 L1 - you need a comma after 'cathedrals' otherwise you are implying that the cathedrals are tinted and not the glass.
ST 6 L1 - again a comma is needed here after 'lenses' for the same reason as above.

I love the contrast between the different elements of the glass with the granite, clay and chalk. You have done well to continue your metaphor throughout the piece.

Personally I would remove the third lines of both ST 5 and 6, as they seem unneeded in a way, and almost get in the way of the message you are trying to bring through.

Overall, a really good piece.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to MagicalJoey [2012-11-08 20:34:25 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much!
I'll get down to changing these things.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaifuWolffy In reply to divafica [2013-01-21 02:53:44 +0000 UTC]

i kinda wanted to see the unedited one also

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to WaifuWolffy [2013-01-21 16:41:03 +0000 UTC]

Sorry, I don't remember it

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

WaifuWolffy In reply to divafica [2013-01-21 17:32:02 +0000 UTC]

its fine :3

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jessica35 [2012-10-30 23:32:31 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


Hello from the writers club! a.deviantart.net/avatars/w/r/w… " alt=" " title="Writers--club" />

I see that you've already been critiqued on this so I'm going to keep this quite short. When I give critiques I always try my best to actually criticize, but, I only have praise for you. This is a beautiful piece of work. I love your use of punctuation (so many poets forget to use it at all). I thought the way you used the glass metaphor throughout your entire poem was genius. This is a such an original and captivating poem. It was a pleasure to read your work, keep up the great work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to jessica35 [2012-10-31 10:27:30 +0000 UTC]

Thank you, this was great to read

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SenpaiSakura [2012-10-21 17:31:37 +0000 UTC]

Overall

Vision

Originality

Technique

Impact


An excellent metaphor of glass versus chalk. I like how you contrasted aspects of glass with characteristics of chalk. it would flow better if you kept to this compare and contrast scheme throughout the whole piece.

Your vocabulary choice is very nice. I like how in one stanza you use words such as "cathedral" and "enchantment" and in the next one use terms such as "paste" and "keypads". It is a nice contrast that parallels the preexisting contrast between glass and chalk.

To make this piece even better, I would suggest working on the flow and rhythm, because it was a little difficult to follow parts of it. The ending, though, is a perfect wrapping-up of the whole piece. Succinct and simple.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to SenpaiSakura [2012-10-21 17:50:02 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for this!

You're right about that, I see exactly what you mean about the chalk, it is a much better contrast for the glass as opposed to the other things I've written. I'll work on changing the others to suite it better.
Reading it through again I'll work on the flow as well.

Very helpful, I love critiques.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SenpaiSakura In reply to divafica [2012-10-21 17:52:42 +0000 UTC]

no worries

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

xTintedlullabyx [2015-08-22 04:35:25 +0000 UTC]

This is as beautiful now as it was to me when I read it 2 years ago. I know neither of us have been very active on the site, but I do hope you're still writing. You have a real gift and I'm glad you received the DD - as you are infinitely deserving of it - so others could read your work. If you return to the site and see this, whatever month or year it may be when you do, know that I am and always will be your fan. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to xTintedlullabyx [2016-01-05 20:05:07 +0000 UTC]

Thank you so much, this meant a lot!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jade-Pandora [2013-01-21 07:15:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to Jade-Pandora [2013-01-21 16:38:13 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

clarissabelle [2013-01-21 05:16:01 +0000 UTC]

This is a beautiful piece of poetry.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to clarissabelle [2013-01-21 16:38:28 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

clarissabelle In reply to divafica [2013-01-21 17:20:34 +0000 UTC]

Your welcome.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moon-lit-words [2013-01-21 01:19:16 +0000 UTC]

my apologies if the comment is a repeat and for my lack of remembering the technical terminology

at magical joey: the comma after cathedrals is irrelevant because of the following syntactical device: The tourists who knew of the flood took a different route. (compared to) The tourists, who knew of the flood, took a different route.

the comma simply differentiates which tourists are included in the description following the noun 'tourists'. same for cathedrals. writer of this piece would need to place the quality of tinted and such following glass. same for the following stanza

as per grammatical usage, no rudeness intended c:

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to moon-lit-words [2013-01-21 16:40:26 +0000 UTC]

I'm sorry? I'm confused.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

moon-lit-words In reply to divafica [2013-01-21 16:44:26 +0000 UTC]

nothing to do with your writing; it's a good piece

the other guy made an incorrect analysis of your grammar, so i corrected that. i didn't know how to reply to him personally, but i saw you'd possibly edited your piece regarding his comments about commas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to moon-lit-words [2013-01-21 19:43:09 +0000 UTC]

Oh right! Now I see what you mean

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

moon-lit-words In reply to divafica [2013-01-22 03:54:53 +0000 UTC]

sorry for any confusion or clutter on your piece

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to moon-lit-words [2013-01-22 16:44:52 +0000 UTC]

It's fine!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Noojie-Woojie [2013-01-21 00:03:35 +0000 UTC]

I love how you used the concept of contradiction in every simile in this piece. Lovely.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to Noojie-Woojie [2013-01-21 16:37:57 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

chancerox [2013-01-20 23:54:14 +0000 UTC]

This is so bluntly true, for everyone. Even the fragile things are made of rocks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to chancerox [2013-01-21 16:37:17 +0000 UTC]

I'm so glad you can relate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Deaths-Lament [2013-01-20 22:45:37 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to Deaths-Lament [2013-01-21 16:36:36 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TheStarlitOrangeTree [2013-01-20 20:29:28 +0000 UTC]

Congrats on the well deserved DD! I loved the simplicity, the precise definition that still had a flow. Imperfections are not presented in a shameful way, and the laughter gives it a relaxed air. Good job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to TheStarlitOrangeTree [2013-01-20 21:01:19 +0000 UTC]

Thank you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TheStarlitOrangeTree In reply to divafica [2013-03-07 20:54:59 +0000 UTC]

't was my pleasure

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Euxiom [2013-01-20 20:11:33 +0000 UTC]

That was wonderful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to Euxiom [2013-01-20 21:01:25 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LostGryphin [2013-01-20 16:09:05 +0000 UTC]

wow - stunning - congrats on the DD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to LostGryphin [2013-01-20 17:59:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you very much.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Lintu47 [2013-01-20 15:16:52 +0000 UTC]

Congrats on the well deserved DD!
Have a nice day!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to Lintu47 [2013-01-20 17:59:08 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lintu47 In reply to divafica [2013-01-20 19:21:29 +0000 UTC]

My pleasure

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LetThereBeApples [2013-01-20 14:24:33 +0000 UTC]

Very nice.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to LetThereBeApples [2013-01-20 17:58:22 +0000 UTC]

Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LetThereBeApples In reply to divafica [2013-01-20 17:59:47 +0000 UTC]

Of course ^.^

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

FirstAndLastMen [2013-01-20 11:26:32 +0000 UTC]

i'm sure i've heard this before. i know i have. this has been written before.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to FirstAndLastMen [2013-01-20 11:48:02 +0000 UTC]

Where?
I wrote this.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FirstAndLastMen In reply to divafica [2013-01-20 11:58:22 +0000 UTC]

When?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

divafica In reply to FirstAndLastMen [2013-01-20 12:01:22 +0000 UTC]

A day before I submit it so Oct. 20 2012
Is it somewhere else?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FirstAndLastMen In reply to divafica [2013-01-20 14:20:03 +0000 UTC]

definitely. i have definitely seen this. the part about chalk has been used word for word before. no question

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

divafica In reply to FirstAndLastMen [2013-01-20 17:57:12 +0000 UTC]

Oh, could you link me where?

👍: 0 ⏩: 0


| Next =>