HOME | DD

djailledie — Gazing

Published: 2011-12-07 18:04:02 +0000 UTC; Views: 733; Favourites: 24; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description .
Related content
Comments: 39

Markotxe [2012-03-03 08:36:28 +0000 UTC]

on le comprend

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Markotxe [2012-03-09 05:43:02 +0000 UTC]

C'est clair!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

jmgmarco [2011-12-09 13:08:31 +0000 UTC]

Vitesse mag

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to jmgmarco [2011-12-18 07:46:14 +0000 UTC]

Ca se peut bien.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SUDOR [2011-12-08 09:58:45 +0000 UTC]

Pas mal, malgré le manque de netteté (et la surex en bas de l'image !). Le Samsung n'est vraiment pas fait pour l'instantané ! Pense à un Ricoh GRD 3 d'occase, ou lle GRD 4 neuf, "si toi plus fortuné". Le Ricoh GRD 3 OU 4 EST le compact le plus rapide (mode snap) et le mieux adapté - plus que cetains reflex- à la photo de rue !

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to SUDOR [2011-12-18 07:40:01 +0000 UTC]

C'est clair. Cette surex est malheureusement assez courante. Peut-etre que je pourrais le sauver en utilisant du raw, mais je suis trop faineant pour ca.
Quand au temps de reaction, j'arrive a peu pres a en faire mon affaire maintenant, mais le mode manuel de mise au point est peu pratique a utiliser!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Aneirin-Aryon [2011-12-08 04:48:43 +0000 UTC]

Awesome.

I love these reflections.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Aneirin-Aryon [2011-12-18 07:37:50 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Justin.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bridge-villian [2011-12-07 23:40:54 +0000 UTC]

I think I've seen those legs before - "Warning"

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

SLpImpressions In reply to bridge-villian [2011-12-19 17:42:44 +0000 UTC]

you do know he follows them ?!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bridge-villian In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-12-19 23:51:34 +0000 UTC]

I know, he might just get kicked yet!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

SLpImpressions In reply to bridge-villian [2011-12-20 01:37:32 +0000 UTC]

i'm sure if their nice looking legs...he wont mind so much.
:d

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bridge-villian In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-12-20 09:11:49 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to bridge-villian [2011-12-18 07:37:31 +0000 UTC]

I warned you!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bridge-villian In reply to djailledie [2011-12-18 08:46:44 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Piarvi-Recherreen [2011-12-07 22:44:18 +0000 UTC]

qui regarde qui ?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Piarvi-Recherreen [2011-12-18 07:32:12 +0000 UTC]

Nous etions nombreux

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Piarvi-Recherreen In reply to djailledie [2011-12-18 11:21:33 +0000 UTC]

un chassé-croisé de regards ... vraiment très intéressante ta photo, on passe un moment à la contempler

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Milanogreg [2011-12-07 20:32:47 +0000 UTC]

Nice. Lot's of gazing going on here...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Milanogreg [2011-12-18 07:31:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Greg. Indeed, that's something I like to do, even without the camera.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Marsilea [2011-12-07 19:34:23 +0000 UTC]

Le cadrage vertical est vraiment troublant!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Marsilea [2011-12-18 07:30:28 +0000 UTC]

Tu veux dire que la table perturbe?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marsilea In reply to djailledie [2011-12-18 22:46:44 +0000 UTC]

La photo est troublante, et le cadrage vertical y participe: bien composé. La table équilibre bien les lignes verticales.
D'accord aussi avec ce que j'ai lu sur les commentaires, une table plus nuancée et moins surexposée aurait été top, probablement possible sur le post traitement, avec des calques d'exposition différente.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Marsilea [2011-12-19 06:22:23 +0000 UTC]

Bien sur, j'aurais pu corriger ca. Mais je dois avouer que passer plus de 5mn sur photoshop est rarissime. Je pense que celle la est non traitee - le jpg par defaut de l'appareil. En fait, si j'ai 5mn, je prefere les passer avec l'appareil a la main qu'avec la souris a la main.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marsilea In reply to djailledie [2011-12-19 09:42:38 +0000 UTC]

Tu as bien raison... Je devrais faire pareil mais j aime bien aussi le post traitement...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Marsilea [2012-01-05 05:24:43 +0000 UTC]

Je ne suis pas doué pour le post-traitement... ou alors je ne sais pas faire.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marsilea In reply to djailledie [2012-01-05 19:01:25 +0000 UTC]

Ou simplement tu ne trouves pas d'intérêt à passer du temps dessus, et vu la qualités de tes photos tu n'as pas totalement tort.
De mon point de vue, tout peut s'apprendre, moyennement intérêt, temps et persévérance.
Cela étant dit, je pense que certaines de tes photos pourraient encore gagner dans un peu plus de post traitement, sans perdre le côté parfois "décalé". Et puis se passer du post traitement délibérément sur certaines photos, lorsqu'on a pourtant un savoir faire, c'est aussi classe

Et sinon bravo

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Marsilea [2012-01-17 05:32:59 +0000 UTC]

Oh, il y a aussi que je passe ma journee sur un ordinateur, donc la photo avec un appareil a la main, ca me decontracte plus que la photo une souris a la main...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marsilea In reply to djailledie [2012-01-17 20:39:53 +0000 UTC]

Je comprends..

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

comteskyee [2011-12-07 19:18:31 +0000 UTC]

l'observateur "en chef" est celui qui tient l'appareil et qu'on ne voit donc pas

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to comteskyee [2011-12-18 07:26:43 +0000 UTC]

C'est du moins ce qu'il espere!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SLpImpressions [2011-12-07 19:03:23 +0000 UTC]

a watcher watching the one watching

👍: 0 ⏩: 3

SLpImpressions In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-12-19 17:43:18 +0000 UTC]

----------

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-12-18 07:22:42 +0000 UTC]

Yes, and that the part we see, I don't know who was watching me!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MARX77 In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-12-07 19:58:21 +0000 UTC]

Couldn't have said it better myself.
Brilliant comment! I agree 100%

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

RichardLeach [2011-12-07 18:33:56 +0000 UTC]

Ah! I love the seated gazer inside the standing one - the very gaze-worthy woman in the white coat - and the neat geometrical composition formed by the man, the woman, and the cluster of people at far right just above center. There are other nice details too, these are just the "big" ones!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to RichardLeach [2011-12-18 07:26:13 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Richard. Yes, there is always a large complexity in these reflections, that I am always hesitant to capture - the first reason being that before you are on the computer, you don't know what you are going to see. Sometimes it turns out well, sometimes it doesn't. Is the photographer still in charge in that case?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

RichardLeach In reply to djailledie [2011-12-19 15:55:10 +0000 UTC]

It does seem that the photographer is not in charge. Though you retain the final say over whether to share the image or discard it - the ultimate being in charge. Photography - at least street - is different from other arts that way, isn't it? I control every single word in a poem - although, people interpret them in different ways that I don't have a say over. Every form has its own areas where the artist is in charge and where the artist is not.

Joel was hard on the photo, wasn't he? To me it's about the image, the overexposure just seemed like more goodness

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to RichardLeach [2012-01-05 05:41:01 +0000 UTC]

Yes, in street, you can't control everything. Unless you are VERY patient, you cannot get everything right - and sometimes it is never right. Wisdom would be to give up, but it is frustrating.
Of course, as for poems, people will interpret things differently, and the limit is our own representation of the right word or the right time.
Joel criticized the exposure - and the burned white area at the bottom. I am sure I could fix that if I was using more processing, but I hate to do that...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0