HOME | DD

djailledie In reply to tokslinas [2014-09-27 05:30:28 +0000 UTC]

Thanks. Indeed, it is good to be with our own shadow.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

tokslinas In reply to djailledie [2014-09-28 15:31:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to Alzbettta [2011-03-15 05:49:12 +0000 UTC]

Yes, indeed. With shadows, you are never alone indeed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to Katanear [2011-03-12 06:48:54 +0000 UTC]

That's this time of the year where we starting seeing more often the sun but the shadows are still very long.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to 2jL [2011-03-11 06:29:09 +0000 UTC]

Merci, Jean-Jacques.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to SLpImpressions [2011-02-25 05:51:26 +0000 UTC]

You mean !! _ !!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to bridge-villian [2011-02-25 05:57:04 +0000 UTC]

Hmm. You know that Google is too clever for us. It does not find the same things based on your own searching habits. I can't seem to find anything that matches.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bridge-villian In reply to djailledie [2011-02-25 06:50:59 +0000 UTC]

JD: You are quite right, perhaps my association was too obscure to my own strange way of seeing things.

I'll try to explain; to me the shadows flow from the backs of these people like the train of a dress (i.e. a wedding dress), and, metaphorically, the shadow appears like the person's soul; while "The Kooples" style of clothing is billed as the "ultra-hip" fashion, and "The Soul Train" was a 70's dance and music TV program featuring Soul and Rock Music, and was billed as, "the hippest trip(show) in America"

Therefore, "the soul train" is the shadow/souls flowing like the train of a dress from this ultra-hip couple like the "SOUL TRAIN", (See below site)..... It made perfect sense to me, I guess that is why art is universal, but art interpretation is quite personal?

soultrain.com

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to bridge-villian [2011-03-14 05:39:22 +0000 UTC]

Paul, I must say that this was a brilliant comment!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

bridge-villian In reply to djailledie [2011-03-14 21:26:16 +0000 UTC]

pretty far out there, huh? Thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to Elizamac [2011-02-25 05:47:41 +0000 UTC]

Do you think that they will soon shadow each other?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to djailledie [2011-02-25 10:52:30 +0000 UTC]

They may even produce smaller shadows...

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Elizamac [2011-03-14 05:48:45 +0000 UTC]

What will shrink?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Elizamac In reply to djailledie [2011-03-14 15:42:32 +0000 UTC]

Additional shadows, the outcome of coupling

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

djailledie In reply to Elizamac [2011-03-14 19:18:47 +0000 UTC]

Sounds mysterious and dangerous!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to myraincheck [2011-02-25 05:42:45 +0000 UTC]

Grazie Mary! Long shadows for a few more weeks, but soon we will have more light!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to partiallyHere [2011-02-25 05:40:36 +0000 UTC]

Ils sont tout petits

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to Marsilea [2011-02-25 05:26:08 +0000 UTC]

Merci!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Marsilea In reply to djailledie [2011-02-25 07:33:01 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

djailledie In reply to StamatisGR [2011-02-25 05:25:04 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, Stamatis.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

StamatisGR In reply to djailledie [2011-02-25 06:36:28 +0000 UTC]

welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0