HOME | DD

DontNeedFeminism — Why I'm Not A Feminist

#antifeminism #feminism #womenagainstfeminism #idontneedfeminism
Published: 2015-06-13 08:07:29 +0000 UTC; Views: 4146; Favourites: 41; Downloads: 4
Redirect to original
Description There. I said it. Now please, stop trying to force me to bow to feminism.
Related content
Comments: 62

mybaeisnetflix [2016-10-08 17:43:02 +0000 UTC]

You need a medal. A gold medal. No wait, a platinum medal.
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Hoodz-DA [2016-02-14 19:28:41 +0000 UTC]

I prefer true feminists who are actually about equality and not superiority.  Due to this, I don't like the term feminist as much and would prefer a term more like equalist.  I heavily speak out for the rights of both men and women as well as saying men and women can not all take positives and nothing but, we have to take the negatives of equality as well like if one of us does something wrong, man or woman, we should pay equally for it.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

MissWerecat In reply to Hoodz-DA [2022-01-04 22:14:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ChanterelleFray In reply to Hoodz-DA [2017-05-27 02:58:56 +0000 UTC]

I could not agree with you more. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

C-rimson-Battlefield [2015-12-19 18:31:47 +0000 UTC]

Feminism.

I don't think it means.


What you think it means.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-04-16 07:47:20 +0000 UTC]

When you say shit like this, Feminism does indeed mean what she says it means. Now unless you've got a real point to stand on, you can go fuck off.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-18 02:09:01 +0000 UTC]

Calm your fucking rectum, for shit's sake. 
She is just hinting that ALL feminists think bad shit about men and do idiotic bullcrap.
She is taking all her experiences with feminazis, and putting it into one group, which is rather ridiculous and plain stupid.
 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-04-18 04:11:28 +0000 UTC]

So you're basically going NAFALT. Funny, when feminists hear "Not all men..." they consider it a derailment and often joke about it. Also, just because you don't want them to be, it doesn't mean that they're not from Scotland.

So again, until you've got some real material to work with, fuck off.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-24 16:59:37 +0000 UTC]

Lay off the drugs, darlin'. When you start learning, then I'll fuck off. Have a lovely day! :^)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-04-24 22:02:19 +0000 UTC]

Translation: I have nothing, but instead of swallowing my pride and admitting I'm wrong, I'm just going to insult you and insinuate you're ignorant because I'm an absolute chickenshit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-25 01:35:35 +0000 UTC]

If that's what you think, dearie. Keep telling yourself that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-04-25 07:27:31 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, keep feigning superiority, that'll get you far.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-25 10:30:34 +0000 UTC]

Pfft. What superiority? I'm not any better than any other person in this world.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-04-25 12:20:49 +0000 UTC]

You certainly play the part well enough.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-05-26 02:03:56 +0000 UTC]

Apologies for my past immaturity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to C-rimson-Battlefield [2016-05-26 02:32:23 +0000 UTC]

Apology accepted.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

C-rimson-Battlefield In reply to Crapcarp [2016-05-26 04:51:49 +0000 UTC]

Greatly appreciated.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

tultsi93 [2015-10-29 17:11:03 +0000 UTC]

Very true. Especially the last one.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MissWerecat In reply to tultsi93 [2022-01-04 22:17:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

tultsi93 In reply to MissWerecat [2022-01-10 11:36:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MissWerecat In reply to tultsi93 [2022-01-11 11:35:39 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MissWerecat In reply to MissWerecat [2022-01-11 11:38:29 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MissWerecat In reply to MissWerecat [2022-01-11 11:42:07 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MissWerecat In reply to MissWerecat [2022-01-04 22:18:59 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

HFJ13 [2015-10-02 03:51:37 +0000 UTC]

I want to start a religion based around you. After all, a God has to be wise.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to HFJ13 [2015-10-02 04:37:41 +0000 UTC]

I'm flattered, but I'm no God. Just a stubborn human being who won't shut up.

👍: 1 ⏩: 1

HFJ13 In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-10-02 22:19:00 +0000 UTC]

Too late. Already using my religion as an excuse to beat blacks.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to HFJ13 [2015-10-03 05:12:37 +0000 UTC]

goddammit

Or, I guess... me dammit.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HFJ13 In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-10-03 05:29:30 +0000 UTC]

Commandment #1) Do use your name in vain. The punishment is me hanging to homosexuals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to HFJ13 [2015-10-03 05:42:48 +0000 UTC]

What are you hanging to these homosexuals? A massive, floppy cock from your pants?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

HFJ13 In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-10-03 05:48:06 +0000 UTC]

Sh!t, meant to say two. Hanging TWO homosexuals.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NikitaTarsov [2015-09-30 17:16:02 +0000 UTC]

I agree with some points, with others i didn´t. I see your statement discredited through a form with links and personal points that not gets explained. 
And in the same time you call for sameness, you attack females who are strong enough to not get into such a corruptet tag like "Feminism". In the end you do here the same thing that you criticize, and in addition, you call for fights with people who felt insult by your (too lose formulate) words. 

Both sides in this war can go too far, but a in a good society a individuals right to beat end where literally the nose of the other one begins. Without that idea, people will fight for fighting, insult just to harm ther "enemys", who in a functional society is just a partner for debates. 

This post, in this form, just spreads hate.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to NikitaTarsov [2015-09-30 19:03:50 +0000 UTC]

If criticizing the actions of a harmful political movement that hinders equality and promotes hatred is now considered "spreading hatred," "attacking," and "calling for fights," well I guess you caught me.

Progress and solutions cannot happen without criticism and identifying issues. People are harmed and demonized by feminism. I'm not going to sit here and let that happen. I'm going to speak out against the problems caused by feminism.

I don't call for sameness. I call for reason. I call for solutions. I call for truth. I call for equality (which is different from sameness).

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

NikitaTarsov In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-09-30 23:09:14 +0000 UTC]

Every political party does this, it keeps them alive through the attention. Moving this cycle through inserting energy is doing the same thing as the single political party does. Ther was a time where female need that hard words and actions to get of ther shakles, i understand this as much as i understand all other kind of rebels who fight against an oppressing system(in a value). But this fight has endet, they have the freedom they wanted, and a few stupid monkeys want more than they earn. Normal biz. 
In germany we don´t have the need for the motion anymore, and ignore the last freaked out feminists who still run around like female still not had a political voice or have to stay ready if the man get´s horny. Ignore the retards and let them be forgotten, taht´s teh only way to get over them. Fighting against them is just giving them arguments to form another generation of retards. 

Do not turn my words, they are for you, not for me - i allready know all i say here. 

Well, that may be true, that progress can´t happen without searching for problems. But how many people do you think are listening for arguments? And how many are affected by repeated false facts?
In the eye of many feminists, and many who will become feminists, they fear what they see in (misinterpreted(and they will)) persons like you, and so will use yourself as a argument for feminism. 

To be honest, in Germany we had really forgotten this problem for getting obsolet...here. But i forget that America is still a few years behind in every thing relating to democracy and free thinking(nothing against you, but take a look to the streets and to the news). 
I understand the point to fight morons, but aren´t ther no bigger problems in the world? 

Hm, the dictionary say that ther is just a difference in interpretation, but hell it´s not my basic language. Okay, here the ugly facts: You wont get reason, solutions, truth, and the last thing you will find is equality or sameness. Cause humans are stupid and shitty. Be part of it or step back and see what your action have as result. Not what you want to be the result, what will be

If i would go on the street to demonstrate for the left wing movement, right wing will take me as reason to make a demonstration twice that large. They abuse me and my good intend action to create fear, and with this fear they lead many more normal people into a fictional treatment where they had to fight or drown. Isen´t this cynical?

The right and the duty of free people is to reflect about ther actions, or at last accept that they are part of the problem. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

AspiePie [2015-09-10 15:25:33 +0000 UTC]

I am a rape victim myself...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

atenahena [2015-07-23 03:23:40 +0000 UTC]

soo, you dont think men and women should be equal?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to atenahena [2015-07-23 03:26:33 +0000 UTC]

Soooo, you're completely and deliberately missing the point?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-07-23 19:38:19 +0000 UTC]

the literal definition of feminism is "the advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men" so how am i missing the point

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DontNeedFeminism In reply to atenahena [2015-07-23 20:08:43 +0000 UTC]

Because you're taking feminism as a literal string of words in a dictionary instead of the political movement it is in practice.

The United States, for example, is defined as a "federal republic" in the dictionary, but in reality, it is an oligarchy.

Problems with a system or movement cannot be addressed unless we acknowledge they exist. If we define feminism by static words on a page instead of actions with real-world consequences, nothing will be fixed.

A movement becomes toxic if its problems are ignored and allowed to fester and spread. We see this with feminism today, in part because of people who cling to the dictionary definition and try to distance themselves from the issues.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-07-23 20:33:56 +0000 UTC]

i do understand that the "feminists" of today's society are quite far from the actual definition however by saying or making titles such as "don't need feminism" is quite misleading and is ignoring the actually meaning of feminism. Saying that the world doesn't need feminism(by its literal definition) is ignoring all of the actual problems that are arising due to the inequality of men and women. even though your right about how modern day "feminists" are exaggerating  most situations or ideas it doesn't mean you can make ignorant and naive statements such as "don't need feminism" or "why i'm not a feminist" because saying that literally translates into why i don't believe men and women should be equal

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

Crapcarp In reply to atenahena [2016-04-16 08:23:09 +0000 UTC]

Here's a question for ya: Are you for economic prosperity?

If you answered yes, then congratulations! You're a Nazi because the Nazis did everything they did for economic prosperity and the movement was defined by this goal.

Y'see how stupid your reasoning is? You can be against a movement without being against what that movement advocates. Feminism does not hold a monopooly on equality, people can disagree with its premise without disagreeing what it advocates for.

To say otherwise is to be a bigot.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-16 15:44:23 +0000 UTC]

uhh, i said that i while ago and have completely forgotten this conversation by now so i don't really know what you're talking about. Whatever you're saying i guess you right then...i guess im a stupid nazi bigot that believes in economic prosperity? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to atenahena [2016-04-16 22:05:42 +0000 UTC]

I looked up your conversation, you basically kept saying "Feminism is equality, that's it's definition". I was simply proving you wrong by pointing out that one may be for economic prosperity, but not a Nazi, even if the Nazis were about economic prosperity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-16 22:45:38 +0000 UTC]

oh, okay then, i guess i just don't think you should rule out all feminism because of some over the top ones. feminism (assuming you a female) is why you can even voice you opinion right now. pretend you're black, just cause some black people commit crimes doesn't mean all of you do

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to atenahena [2016-04-16 22:51:15 +0000 UTC]

You're missing the point. I'm not going on about what feminists are doing, I'm just pointing out you can be against a movement as a whole without being against what that movement is about. I'm anti-feminist and I believe in equality. In fact, it is because I believe in equality that I'm anti-feminist. Feminism is not equality, it is simply a movement that advocates for it, and like any other movement, it can be wrong and do bad things.

I don't think feminists are evil, I just think they're wrong.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-16 22:57:27 +0000 UTC]

same goes to you, generalizing all feminism to a select few

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Crapcarp In reply to atenahena [2016-04-17 04:00:56 +0000 UTC]

Oh for fuck's sake. If you're gonna be like that, nevermind. I'm done trying to reason with you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to Crapcarp [2016-04-17 05:44:14 +0000 UTC]

oki doki, have a nice day

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DontNeedFeminism In reply to atenahena [2015-07-23 20:49:46 +0000 UTC]

Feminism does not hold a monopoly on equality. The literal dictionary definition is not what defines it in practice.

I don't need a corrupt political movement in my life. There are much better alternatives to feminism, such as egalitarianism. People can address inequality without feminism.

I never said I didn't want equality. You're deliberately misinterpreting everything I say and clinging to the dictionary, because it's the only defense you've got. And that's just sad. 

If you can't see past the dictionary definition, you're part of the problem. Good day to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

atenahena In reply to DontNeedFeminism [2015-07-23 21:43:08 +0000 UTC]

i completely agree with what you say and your ideals but ignoring the definition and thinking its wrong to follow it is quite ignorant itself, are you trying to say that the whole world should follow YOUR definition  and people who don't are the problem? again, i agree with what your saying but saying we don't need feminism and saying that following a definition is part of the problem is very, well... stupid (no offense)

👍: 0 ⏩: 1


| Next =>