HOME | DD
Doodle-Sprinkles β Here's my gift
Published: 2012-12-28 12:18:23 +0000 UTC; Views: 4213; Favourites: 304; Downloads: 13
Redirect to original
Description
So late >___<Since a lot of things happened, I did this for like 30 minutes.
Anyway, HAPPY HOLIDAYS!
Related content
Comments: 35
okay forget about the haters i luv the contrast of anime and this cartoon so ROCK ON!!!!XD
π: 0 β©: 0
i think it's really cute!!!!
but i do have to say that the inside of the mouth would be a redish color rather than skin colored...or white if that's meant to be teeth...that and Marshall looks a bit feminine .w. /shot
i don't mean to be mean or anything D: /shot more
π: 0 β©: 0
Adorable for the uncultured and xignorant. Awful for the aknowledged and dedicated.
π: 0 β©: 1
With all due respect, sir, but if what you're saying has a negative implication then please refrain from commenting. I have no intention of hearing such things.
π: 0 β©: 1
Nope, what it says is the following:
"It's a work completely lacking of any technical knowledged and skill. Made most likely by fake knowledge gotten through persistent observation of unappropiate sources for learning.
However, buy pandering to an specific genre (anime/manga fans), it happens to get attention from people who will not judge something that reminds them of their likings. That said in an illusory manner, as the present work doesn't manage to represent the actual dedication and effort put into their likings (i.e. Anime-mangas made by people who has spent years learning the tehcniques and creating a stylization process.
Thus, for people who knows all the knowledge required to produce actual manga/anime, the present work lacks of any appeal, dedication, or even a pourpose. However, for people ignoring the creative process behind it, and withouth the culture for quality and perseverance, it's a "decent" piece of "work""
π: 0 β©: 1
Although I appreciate your effort and time to write something this long, I would love to say that I don't give a damn. What you wrote is purely based on closed minded judgement and it's your opinion. You may be right but then again, I don't care. I could make works based on 'fake knowledge from inappropriate sources' as much as I want and who are you to judge me? It's my art and it's none of your business. I earned lots of praises for my art and for me, I deserve it. May I ask, are you one of the people who knows 'all' the knowledge required to produce actual manga/anime? I learned all I know based on my own observations and I don't go by the book, hell, I'd rather jump off a cliff than go to art lessons and listen to lectures about what is right and what is wrong. What is art if we all base our works in the same sources? Creativity is made, not studied and copied. I'm only 15 but I have a more open mind than you and I'll stand for my statement.
π: 0 β©: 1
(Observations taken from watching lots of anime and manga. Period.)
Yes, ALL art is based on the same basics, and creativity is the response to it's limitations.
Having 15 doesn't mean you're at the top of you skills. It means you just grew some pubes, then though you've all the knowledge to change the world (a.k.a. "Iknow-it-all")
You're 15. It means you just found out about sexuality. Not that you've spent a lifetime learning important stuff. Whatever argument is made by you is based not on facts, but the beliuef that you're beyond question. When the truth is that you wont last 15 minutes in the real world withouth mommy and daddy by your side.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yes, and I am pretty proud that I learn from just watching and not studying. All art is made from creativity, period.
I am fifteen and I could proudly say that I'm way better than some other people my age or even older. I am a know-it-all but I have my talent to prove that because even though I only see things, I learn. I don't need books or studying. How about you? Do you have anything to prove rather than your words?
I am fifteen and I am a scholar. I have lived years without my parents by my side and I earn money by getting good grades. And do you believe that your argument is based on facts? I have nothing to say about that because I could just laugh. I can and will last the real world without them because I'm doing so right now.
Anyway, what could you gain if you argue with me? It won't change the fact that people appreciate my work even though it is completely lacking of any technical knowledge and skill.
π: 0 β©: 1
TL;DR There's nothing, literally nothing, a highschooler can teach to the world. After you hit 25 you'll know.
π: 0 β©: 2
You're really rude. It's really cool and cute. If YOU don't like it, don't look at it. And kids can teach a LOT to the world. Adults are just a bunch of close-minded, nagging, critisizing people who swear a lot. I hope when I'm an adult, I'm not a thing like you.
π: 0 β©: 1
Yeah, I bet they know a lot from their ample experience and adquired knowledge about the hardships of life and society from their mornings at the school and afternoons at the shopping mall.
π: 0 β©: 1
I'm thirteen and most of the time, I'm talking to my mum about politics and society. Where did you make all your mistakes, that made you wiser? IN YOUR CHILDHOOD. Can you imagine going into adulthood without being a child? You'd be pathetic, moneyless, jobless, and a pain. Don't underistimate children because the great people today (and in the past): Obama, Her Majesty of England, Mahatma Ghandi, etc, were all once children.
π: 0 β©: 0
And that's where you'll be proven wrong, sir.
π: 0 β©: 1
Well, I take your laugh as a sense of desperate attempt to say something, pitiful. I can say numerous high school students who contributed a whole lot than you, the person who just sits there, argues with a kid younger than him through the internet when you got nothing to prove. So yeah, just shut up, sir.
π: 0 β©: 2
I don't need to prove anything to a kid, because the kid certainly has no interest in learning. As you said, you feel realised after recieving praise for these badly drawn cartoons. Which gives me the hint you're only doing it for the attention.
You tell me you're open minded. You're not. You're 15, you've yet to meet the whole subject before you can really decide wether you like the "cannon" of the trade, or doing otherwise.
Again, if a highschooler goes out, aids the elderly, LEARNS a job and PRACTICE it, it still gets you out of that equation. All you do are cartoons for the sake of asspats. Technically, you're not giving a shit for the world. Contradictory for a person who claims highschoolers does the opposite.
Nah, the good thing out of this, is that there are chances that in the future, you look at this conversation and you'll notice a thing or two. After all, all you want to do is draw as you please. And take "praise" as a proof of its quality. Wether this is done by close-relatives who makes in order to avoid hurting your feelings, or people who only wants to get rid of you.
π: 0 β©: 1
This is what I don't understand: Adventure Time, the topic of this artwork, is a KIDS SHOW. So if you have passed the age of 25, I wonder why you're even looking for pictures of this? No ageism intended, but sir, you are creeping me out by having even LOOKED at this picture, much less insulted it because it "isn't REAL art". What are you even doing here?
π: 0 β©: 1
I wouldn't be any less interested in the cartoon itself. However, if you had read the entire discussion, you would have notice the pourpose of my complaints are the technical aspects of the drawing.
If you can't get that, then I did recommend you to assist to middle school over again.
π: 0 β©: 1
If it was so important that you said this, you could have commented on a more I don't know, ADULT APPROPRIATE picture. Or ust wrote a journal about it. But if kids are so darn fragile, like you say, maybe you shouldn't go around insulting them for no reason.
π: 0 β©: 1
Welcome to the real world, kid. Nobody is going to stop and wait for you; nor will they comfort you. You either get in shape, or get the fuck off.
π: 0 β©: 1
Frankly, I think you're just trolling. It's nice you think that you're so deep and everyone will praise you for your words of wisdom, but obiously,you have failed to accomplish that right now. So I suggest you GTFO and go schmuck it up with somody else's art.
π: 0 β©: 1
There's only one thing which I want and that is people starting to put some real effort into it.
If you think that's trolling; or that I seek appraisal for it, then I can assure you, kid, you'll have plenty of problems with your parents, and teachers at school, college, and the future in general.
So, seeing that you're not interested in proper instructions for a proper development of artistical skills, I declare this little disscussion over. Enjoy doing the least you can.
π: 0 β©: 1
Excuse me for my language, but you're acting like a douche. Just because you don't think they did as good a job on theirs as you did on yours, doesn't mean you can be rude. I'm sure whoever made this art is very proud of it and worked really hard on it, but of course, being younger than you, it is very probable that they will have less skill than you. That doesn't mean they didn't put any effort into it.
π: 0 β©: 0
Agreeing with you, art is almost pure creativity. And "MakarovJAC" it actually is a fine piece of art she has there. You may not be fond of it, but other people are. Honestly if you were not fond of her artwork, you shouldn't have said anything. It could possibly damage of what an artist feels about themselves. That's not very fair to the people being insulted by you.
π: 0 β©: 1
What you call creativity here is something that you like just by two reasons:
1.-It features a cartoon you like,
2.-And it also feature a pseudo-style you favor.
However, from the technical aspect, this drawing features three mayor mistakes that someone who calls something art should avoid:
1.-Same face syndrome: Common amongst anime fans, instead of developing time creating different physical traits, they feel satisfy themeselves over a single template, then repeat it over and over again. This one piece is an example. And it shows either how little interest, or creativity, the person has. In that case, this piece fails at creativity.
2.-Side mouths: Another common mistake from anime fans. The side mouth effect is used to shorten anime production time. However, since they unknow this, they get the idea it's cannon of the manga style. In this particular case you fancy over, the blue character who looks exactly the same as the other except for hair and colour, isn't kissing the androgynous character. Failed to express a proper kiss which is a rather simple task. Another proof of poor creativity for not foreseing this.
2.-I once saw a nose like that in real life. A guy's face just hit the asphalt after his motorcycle hit another car. What was left of his nose looked like the noses in the drawing, minus the blood and exposed cartilage. I have to say this is a poor attempt at breaking the Snout Nose many many anime fans see on their favourite shows. Again, instead of effort into animating a mouth, the guys at Japan just draw a snout-like face to shorten production time. It looks awful, and nothing human-like. Not noticing this clearly tells me the author did not had an idea of how to properly portray a human face. Again, poor creativiy for a poor visual effect.
3.-I understand that character is a Rule 34 of a kid from a kid's show. However, both fans and weirdos (guys oversexualising it) depict this poor imitation featuring secondary sexual traits (hips and breast in most sane cases. I don't want to dwell into the erotic pieces. Where in the world are those traits on this piece? The female seems to have an even longer jaw than the male, and it's not an effect of the pose. Again, didn't noticed this, neither it was worked out when "designing" this drawing, clearly expressing poor creativity.
We shouldn't forget that this character is just a poor ripoff some fans came with when wondering what would a female version of the lead look like. Again, instead of following a proper stylization process like the actual characters had, they just game him longer hair (because all females have longer hair), and breasts and hips. I ask: wasn't the original character supposed to be a kid? Shouldn't his Rule 34 version be portrayed as a younger girl? And she's also wearing a mini-skirt, mind you.
Well, guess it didn't help the guys who designed her weren't necessarily kids.
Creativity is not an excuse for such mistakes. And these mistakes are factual. Any actual artist will tell you so. If somebody gets hurt by criticism that isn't buttkissing, well, they shouldn't be trying arts to begin with. It's not my problem they think all they're going to get is appraisal for something they wouldn't sell or even brag about outside of the internet.
π: 0 β©: 0
