HOME | DD

Doodlevolts — Canadian Geese

Published: 2016-02-14 02:38:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 167; Favourites: 25; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description I think I screwed up on this one. Seeing as how they were far away, taking an accurate shot wouldn't be very easy. It's decent enough I guess
Related content

Doodlevolts - Big Bird

Doodlevolts - Fairly Idle

Doodlevolts - Seagulls and the Shore

Doodlevolts - Another Seagull

Doodlevolts - Chirp

Doodlevolts - Watchtower

Doodlevolts - Lineup

Doodlevolts - Rising Clouds

Doodlevolts - Island

effing-stock - Birds1

LisaAnn1968 - Geese

Michies-Photographyy - Canadian Geese in the Fall

LindArtz - Geese Two 2

jeanbeanxoxo - At the pond 3

DisneyFreak1st - Morning Reflection

DragonHaven42 - A Goose and His Army

Sohember - Graceful Goose

Nipntuck3 - geese
Comments: 22

ToddNTheShiningSword [2016-07-01 01:10:43 +0000 UTC]

It's decent. It makes the water look AMAZING. I know the geese are the subject, but with the geese and they color boy to they make that water look good!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to ToddNTheShiningSword [2016-07-02 17:33:19 +0000 UTC]

Thanks, lol.
That's what I thought as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Fedecomics [2016-02-17 02:55:17 +0000 UTC]

coool nwn 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to Fedecomics [2016-02-18 06:04:38 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Fedecomics In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-18 12:41:47 +0000 UTC]

you welcome!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

DrZoro [2016-02-14 23:37:18 +0000 UTC]

The composition is really nice! Like, that zigzag shape. It's a cool picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to DrZoro [2016-02-16 01:42:53 +0000 UTC]

Thank you
Lol, I barely even noticed the zigzag. I was just fixated on taking a shot of the whole flock.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

DrZoro In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-16 16:33:59 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome! 
Well, then the zigzag is an added bonus

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

VicodinFlavoredMints [2016-02-14 08:36:40 +0000 UTC]

It's a good shot! But is right, they're Canadian Geese.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to VicodinFlavoredMints [2016-02-14 15:16:11 +0000 UTC]

Thank you
I fixed the title.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VicodinFlavoredMints In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-18 00:44:58 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome!
Sorry to be nitpicky.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to VicodinFlavoredMints [2016-02-18 05:54:05 +0000 UTC]

That's fine. You don't need to apologize

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

VicodinFlavoredMints In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-18 06:03:12 +0000 UTC]

OK.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

T1Weasel [2016-02-14 02:39:36 +0000 UTC]

I'm no ornithologist, but these look like Canadian Geese to me. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to T1Weasel [2016-02-14 15:16:15 +0000 UTC]

I changed the name. Thanks for pointing that out.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

T1Weasel In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-15 00:03:34 +0000 UTC]

Welcome. To be fair though, this is a fantastic shot. I wish I had a lens that allowed me to zoom that far in. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to T1Weasel [2016-02-16 02:20:42 +0000 UTC]

Thank you
There was a lot of saving up involved.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

T1Weasel In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-16 02:48:40 +0000 UTC]

For my next purchase, I'm looking at a 24-50 mm (I think) lens for my Nikon D90. The current 18-105 mm is great, but I'm going to need more than just the one lens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to T1Weasel [2016-02-16 18:10:55 +0000 UTC]

I'd probably buy something that is out of the range of your current one. (Something that's not in between 18-105 mm)
If what your looking for are backup, or simply alternate, lenses then that choice is fine.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

T1Weasel In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-16 23:49:44 +0000 UTC]

I'm hoping to get a 75-300 mm at some point, simply because I need the zoom lens.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Doodlevolts In reply to T1Weasel [2016-02-18 05:53:59 +0000 UTC]

I'd probably go for those lenses instead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

T1Weasel In reply to Doodlevolts [2016-02-18 17:45:30 +0000 UTC]

I'm on the lookout for them

👍: 0 ⏩: 0