Comments: 44
BioSaber [2009-04-28 22:39:05 +0000 UTC]
aw shit not again. its cloverfield all over again. im gonna get my camera.
👍: 1 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to BioSaber [2009-04-29 04:49:39 +0000 UTC]
"some people think a cucumber taste better pickled" What, huh...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BioSaber In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-29 18:36:59 +0000 UTC]
did you even see cloverfield?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to BioSaber [2009-04-29 19:00:04 +0000 UTC]
I did, and you were not cast...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BioSaber In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-29 19:26:26 +0000 UTC]
its called Rping. ever heard of it?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to BioSaber [2009-04-29 20:27:13 +0000 UTC]
Rping? is that a word, maybe in the beckictionary...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
BioSaber In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-05-01 18:45:45 +0000 UTC]
its Role Playing. RPing=Role Playing
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to BioSaber [2009-05-01 19:57:43 +0000 UTC]
Obviously you don't understand...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TP123 [2009-04-28 00:13:02 +0000 UTC]
Nice work! I was actually considering writing a story based on the original picture, this could help a lot too, thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to TP123 [2009-04-28 00:21:44 +0000 UTC]
Really?, how? you mean a story on Cq's...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TP123 In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-28 01:07:07 +0000 UTC]
It was a story based on Cqmorrell's original picture actually, won't say too much in case I do wind up writing it, and this ruins it, but it was about Clover, Sam and Alex all turning into giant Cloverfield monsters.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to TP123 [2009-04-28 01:09:24 +0000 UTC]
Oh, well it's only really pun Worthy with Clover...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
TP123 In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-28 01:10:46 +0000 UTC]
Aye, might have Clover start turning first, then Sam and Alex, or something like that
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to TP123 [2009-04-28 02:16:20 +0000 UTC]
Maybe, or them as different creatures...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thoadthetoad [2009-04-26 11:10:31 +0000 UTC]
Clover.....Cloverfield monster....
There's a diff? They're both tyranting maniacs.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to gspoon [2009-04-26 17:11:47 +0000 UTC]
No, but the encdcient is called cloverfield...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Joybug [2009-04-26 06:00:32 +0000 UTC]
Horrible pun. I had to recheck after reading the description before I noticed it was clover which only made it worse.
I saw that movie, it was really pointless in my opinion.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Joybug In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-26 06:05:40 +0000 UTC]
Is that supposed to mean that you are simply disagreeing with everything I just said.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragon-Storm In reply to Joybug [2009-04-26 06:08:19 +0000 UTC]
Yes, Cloverfield was originally, the monster wasn't great but good, and Clover-field was a great idea... not mine of course but still...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Joybug In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-26 06:25:12 +0000 UTC]
O yes, A for originality
A for execution I even loved the hand camera
A for realisticness nothing was out of situation behavior.
But D+ for plotline, and that's what counts most for me.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Joybug In reply to Dragon-Storm [2009-04-26 06:38:16 +0000 UTC]
Exactly it had none, it was about as thrilling as napolion dynamite.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1