Comments: 28
Lempiy [2014-12-28 18:37:21 +0000 UTC]
Still adorable (=
I love those emotions on top ^_^
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to Lempiy [2015-01-12 02:08:54 +0000 UTC]
After all this time it's still adorable?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to Lempiy [2015-01-13 05:27:15 +0000 UTC]
Well then, Mr. Lempi; I am no less than flattered by such a statement. Many thanks, sir
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ironicDoomsday [2014-12-20 02:26:03 +0000 UTC]
I'm kinda confused about the pouch...why's it there? Just curious.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to ironicDoomsday [2014-12-21 02:28:18 +0000 UTC]
Why is it there? You'd be surprised how useful something like that could be. It could carry a wide range of things, even a person.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
ironicDoomsday In reply to Dragondestruction [2014-12-21 03:39:45 +0000 UTC]
Huh, interesting! I've usually only seen such a thing like that on kangaroos. (And sometimes with the wrong gender, too.)
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LilArrin [2014-02-24 22:50:17 +0000 UTC]
Can't stress this enough when it comes to expressions. Body language, body language, body language! Copy-pasting the same face and changing minor facial details can only go so far in conveying emotions and emotional levels. The angle of the head, the placements of shoulders/hands, and strategic exaggerations of features all play into creating dynamic emotion portraits.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
KoopaKrazy85 In reply to LilArrin [2014-03-04 04:58:50 +0000 UTC]
I appreciate that criticism - and I tend to agree! The only thing I copy/pasted on those little bust things was the basic head angle (in sketch) and the hair, just because to do otherwise would've taken ages. As for the full-body pictures, I was trying to keep it consistent mostly because a reference exists to show a character's appearance and details. Playing with complex poses can obscure body parts and that'd kind of ruin the point, wouldn't it? If this was a full picture rather than just, really, a preview of Tom's OC, then I'd probably have done something more interesting or complex.
The uniformity was intentional, but I respect that you don't find it particularly engaging and I thank you for expressing it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dragondestruction In reply to LilArrin [2014-02-25 05:28:58 +0000 UTC]
Need I give the reminder that this wasn't drawn by me at all...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
LilArrin In reply to Dragondestruction [2014-02-25 05:37:00 +0000 UTC]
Good thing I'm criticizing the artwork and therefore the artist! Besides, I'm sure you can take away from this, too!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
crazeguy [2014-02-21 16:44:01 +0000 UTC]
It's quite good. Krazy has done a pretty good job, especially the expressions. (The one on the far left)
Personally I prefer your style of drawing your hair(mane/fur?), you look waaay cuter.
And that's all, see you! ^ ^
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
iKYLE [2014-02-21 03:37:41 +0000 UTC]
Karst has successfully made you unbearable cute and awesome at the same time!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to iKYLE [2014-02-21 03:55:42 +0000 UTC]
I would definitely say it's an awesomely done job, and I won't deny that either.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
YoshiDDR [2014-02-21 02:15:59 +0000 UTC]
Woah that is an amazing ref. Kudos to the one who drew this. Now I could draw this... some day :3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to YoshiDDR [2014-02-21 02:21:09 +0000 UTC]
Well it can be easier to draw things when there's a full reference to go with it, and that's what this can serve to be.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
heart-of-a-dragoness [2014-02-21 02:15:18 +0000 UTC]
very nice, I'd been wanting to see this since she told me she was working on it
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Dragondestruction In reply to heart-of-a-dragoness [2014-02-21 02:19:28 +0000 UTC]
Well the mystery is out now, so plenty more will probably end up seeing it too.
Definitely very nice, and I'm much more than impressed I'd say.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turbo-Tails-8027 [2014-02-21 02:00:52 +0000 UTC]
She did very well on this refsheet.
...also, blushing? XOD
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Dragondestruction In reply to Turbo-Tails-8027 [2014-02-21 02:02:47 +0000 UTC]
She asked about a fourth expression, so she went with 'smitten' and I couldn't think of much else at the time. Therefore, we have smitten.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Turbo-Tails-8027 In reply to Dragondestruction [2014-02-21 02:34:40 +0000 UTC]
Whatever works, I guess, but I guess I won't be the first one to take a second glance... ._.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Dragondestruction In reply to Turbo-Tails-8027 [2014-02-21 03:19:10 +0000 UTC]
That's a fair call really, and you and anyone else who won't be probably have their reasons.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0