HOME | DD

drkshp In reply to jeyminems [2009-11-21 13:02:59 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

jeyminems In reply to drkshp [2009-11-21 13:29:36 +0000 UTC]

no problem!

btw, if you have the time, i hope you'll fave some from my gallery if you'll like any. thanks a lot and sorry for bothering.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to jpgmn [2009-11-21 13:03:24 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to arctoa [2008-11-09 15:17:17 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to Makargina [2008-08-27 17:37:37 +0000 UTC]

dzieki

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to ToWelcomeTheFade [2008-08-21 09:33:43 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to smist [2008-08-17 20:19:18 +0000 UTC]

:*

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to mothfly [2008-08-16 17:01:13 +0000 UTC]

tez tak mysle

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

mothfly In reply to drkshp [2008-08-16 17:51:53 +0000 UTC]

cieszę się

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to KeremOkay [2008-08-15 11:14:41 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to Svision [2008-08-13 18:09:30 +0000 UTC]

the vignetting is the effect of NDX400

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Svision In reply to drkshp [2008-08-13 18:20:03 +0000 UTC]

Hmm, Nice filter: would like to have it. When I have a filter on my 10mm I don't have that much vignetting. Anyway. When you like it that way: Keep it that way. It's still a very good photograph.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

drkshp In reply to Svision [2008-08-13 18:34:47 +0000 UTC]

the vignetting gets that strong during the conversion from raw (mainly when adding contrast) and in this case i took some of it (vignetting) off but it still is quite strong i have too admit. though as you say i like it that way. and yeah, other filters dont behave that way, at least not to this extent. i guess its because whatever substance prolongs the exposure is so condensed in it

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to Cern [2008-08-13 15:23:23 +0000 UTC]

should have seen it personally

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Cern In reply to drkshp [2008-08-13 15:42:14 +0000 UTC]

i probably should have...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to pmsmgomes [2008-08-13 15:03:06 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to blackpixie [2008-08-13 11:03:20 +0000 UTC]

no wlasnie robilem tyle ze w tym przypadku czas 10-15sek obejmowal kilka uderzen fal i nie wygladalo to juz tak efektownie (za krotko zeby wymazac ruch fal wiec wygladalo to bardzo chaotycznie) jak jedna falka.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

blackpixie In reply to drkshp [2008-08-13 11:58:06 +0000 UTC]

Tak podejrzewałam.
Wyszło efektownie, fala ładnie się rozmyła

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

drkshp In reply to blackpixie [2008-08-13 12:02:45 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to ArekZ [2008-08-13 10:21:19 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

drkshp In reply to dakotapearl [2008-08-13 10:21:13 +0000 UTC]

thanks. i tried several exposure time but this one was the best.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0