Comments: 18
SirMauser [2013-12-16 02:04:27 +0000 UTC]
rather pixely, but nice. :-3
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
bioghosty4 [2013-06-14 14:17:20 +0000 UTC]
HOT DAM YEAH
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
shadowuria [2011-05-20 19:49:13 +0000 UTC]
awesomeness is awesome
by any chance did she have a boob job rofl
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chellsshade [2011-05-12 19:44:13 +0000 UTC]
As I posted on the other image if this is an actual model that you took a picture of, then it really doesn't belong in the 3-Dimensional Art category.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EDICTARTS In reply to Chellsshade [2011-05-12 20:17:51 +0000 UTC]
what the hell man it my!
and i dont kow who u are ok
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Chellsshade In reply to EDICTARTS [2011-05-12 20:43:46 +0000 UTC]
Of course you don't know me. This is the internet, 99.9999% of the people here are strangers to one another.
Regardless, I wasn't looking to cause a fight. You can post wherever you like as far as I'm concerned. I was just letting you know that these two images are not categorized by the definitions DeviantART uses for "Digital Art/3-Dimensional Art". They are still nice images just not 3D models.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Chellsshade [2011-05-12 19:31:58 +0000 UTC]
Isn't this Photo-manipulation more than 3d rendering?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Vox22 [2011-05-12 07:59:24 +0000 UTC]
She's sexy. Why? Cuz she's got boobies 8-D
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
VEZONISME [2011-05-12 03:25:13 +0000 UTC]
God damn. What kind of camera do you use?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EDICTARTS In reply to VEZONISME [2011-05-12 09:54:49 +0000 UTC]
it a web cam that all
but i do got a hd cam i just dont use
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
nitron100 [2011-05-12 02:40:31 +0000 UTC]
i guess
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Pukeslot [2011-05-11 22:16:09 +0000 UTC]
YEEAAHH BOI!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PrimusRulz [2011-05-11 22:06:04 +0000 UTC]
Hot DAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
EDICTARTS [2011-05-11 21:04:48 +0000 UTC]
HOT DAMMMMM!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0