HOME | DD

ElectricSquid7 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-06-20 16:00:10 +0000 UTC]

I don't imagine that the US, Belize, or Guatemala would be Anarchist in the hypothetical scenario, so the total area controlled by the various anarchistic warlords and communes would be similar to that of present-day Mexico

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to ElectricSquid7 [2019-06-20 16:37:53 +0000 UTC]

You can't have a nation founded on anarchy because anarchy means you have no structure, no rank and no organisation.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

ElectricSquid7 In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-06-20 20:01:02 +0000 UTC]

I'm not saying it works, I'm just providing my explanation lol

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to ElectricSquid7 [2019-06-20 20:02:17 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kreiviskai In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-06-20 13:06:59 +0000 UTC]

State isnt synonimic to the country, ok?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to kreiviskai [2019-06-20 13:08:57 +0000 UTC]

It's a nation state.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

kreiviskai In reply to Lilith-Crowe [2019-06-20 14:33:53 +0000 UTC]

Anarchist 'state' can exist, just in the other way, like federation of anarchist communes or something

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Lilith-Crowe In reply to kreiviskai [2019-06-20 14:44:08 +0000 UTC]

A federation has a governmental hierarchy by definition. 

👍: 0 ⏩: 0