HOME | DD

Deviant552M In reply to Nixiomihla [2023-04-21 00:31:37 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Moonbow69 In reply to Nixiomihla [2016-01-22 23:57:20 +0000 UTC]

did you forget she's also part human?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Nixiomihla In reply to Moonbow69 [2016-01-23 00:09:17 +0000 UTC]

I thought a bit of the personalities were mixed OwO

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

44redz In reply to ADE-Syndicate [2012-12-24 08:49:12 +0000 UTC]

you've got a point there

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MsBiffy In reply to TotalWeirdo666 [2012-08-24 15:52:13 +0000 UTC]

Does it matter? XD It's an adorable picture of a cuddly catgirl. That's all there is to it!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TotalWeirdo666 In reply to MsBiffy [2012-08-24 16:28:33 +0000 UTC]

I'm just saying. The title says "scuba", and I'm merely informing you that this is in fact not scuba. Can't people at the very least give their art accurate titles?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MsBiffy In reply to TotalWeirdo666 [2012-08-24 17:06:53 +0000 UTC]

I understand, it's just that for me, titles don't matter at all. I have a picture titled, "RAINBOWS!!! DD". LOL. I now know that it is NOT scuba, yes, but I still don't think that it really matters. Also, the mask thing is not in her mouth because that wouldn't 'look nice'. (I'm not being sarcastic.) Art is a form of expression and/or simply a pretty picture. It's natural to want to make it as beautiful as you can.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TotalWeirdo666 In reply to MsBiffy [2012-08-24 17:12:46 +0000 UTC]

Yeah, yeah, whatever. It's a snorkel, by the way, though I'm also a little confused as to how she can see without her mask over her eyes.
If the cat is supposed to simply look good, then, why not make it simply a catgirl underwater or a cat-mermaid or something that doesn't require equipment to be underwater without dying a slow and horrible death?
All I'm saying it the artist should have made sure they knew the definition of "scuba" before using it in a picture.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MsBiffy In reply to TotalWeirdo666 [2012-08-24 18:03:15 +0000 UTC]

I get what you mean, but to me there's no difference. LOL

Regarding the looking-good thing, it's hard to explain. I'm not the artist, so I wouldn't know, but if I had drawn it I would probably have done the same thing simply because it 'looked right'. But I guess different people have different opinions, so you're entitled to yours. I can't say that I entirely agree with you here, but it's really not a big deal in my eyes.

Hey....waitaminnit....it IS scuba! There's a thingy on her back! It's just blue so it's harder to notice. XD

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TotalWeirdo666 In reply to MsBiffy [2012-08-24 18:05:35 +0000 UTC]

There's no regulator, so the thingy on her back is completely useless. Scuba divers don't normally even wear snorkels while scuba diving, because they have regulators.

So it's still not scuba.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MsBiffy In reply to TotalWeirdo666 [2012-08-24 18:22:23 +0000 UTC]

Oh. Now I feel stupid. LMAO

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TotalWeirdo666 In reply to MsBiffy [2012-08-24 18:27:09 +0000 UTC]

Haha. It's fine, I don't expect you to know the details of scuba gear XD
I, on the other hand, spent the better part of yesterday 85 feet underwater, so I know a thing or two about what I'm talking about

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

MsBiffy In reply to TotalWeirdo666 [2012-08-24 18:34:22 +0000 UTC]

Neat! ^_^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

TotalWeirdo666 In reply to MsBiffy [2012-08-24 18:34:36 +0000 UTC]

Yep.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

OddGamerGirl In reply to DeusFelidaePluvia [2012-08-12 13:52:15 +0000 UTC]

I would!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0