HOME | DD

ennil β€” Pose

Published: 2005-09-19 16:42:08 +0000 UTC; Views: 2843; Favourites: 29; Downloads: 210
Redirect to original
Description Naz.

Shot with Canon T-50 and Kodak gold 400 iso. Never shoot fashion on film if you have a DSLR. It just is easier with digital.
Related content
Comments: 18

kavsikuzah [2007-03-04 11:50:32 +0000 UTC]

Fevkalade guzel olmus bir bende bu guzellikte fotograf cekebilecekmiyim acaba


tebrikler

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fizzj [2006-04-27 06:41:47 +0000 UTC]

I disagree. Film all the way. But I think I understand what you mean. Since you are working with digital you can check the picture and reshoot and it is easier to print.

I don't like digital expect for the fact that it is cheaper than film, and in fashion that is REALLY important. Which is why before digital, they used to use Hasselblads since the photographer can look at the shot and the camera at the same time.

Either way, love the picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

fizzj [2006-04-27 06:40:31 +0000 UTC]

I disagree. Film all the way. But I think I understand what you mean. Since you are working with digital you can check the picture and reshoot and it is easier to print.

I don't like digital expect for the fact that it is cheaper than film, and in fashion that is REALLY important. Which is why before digital, they used to use Hasselblads since the photographer can look at the shot and the camera at the same time.

Either way, love the picture.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Haru-lover [2006-03-12 23:26:53 +0000 UTC]

beautiful! I like the pose!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

mcfranca [2005-12-03 19:22:13 +0000 UTC]

linda foto-good image,
suave e muito poΓ©tica.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

JoeyLawrence [2005-10-02 00:52:26 +0000 UTC]

I want you for supper

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ennil In reply to JoeyLawrence [2005-10-02 10:44:31 +0000 UTC]

I'll be home at 29pm

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Draco4Ever [2005-09-27 22:08:11 +0000 UTC]

:hugs: Beautiful.

We all miss you bunches ennil.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

jaymp [2005-09-23 02:22:56 +0000 UTC]

Why can't I be you? lol. I miss you. Tons and tons and tons.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ennil In reply to jaymp [2005-09-23 16:41:23 +0000 UTC]

Cause you wouldn't be able to support the perfection.

What's heavier than a ton?

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

jaymp In reply to ennil [2005-09-24 21:59:36 +0000 UTC]

So true.

I don't know what's heavier than a ton, but I do know your icon is the coolest thing I've ever seen. Though, that's only because I've never seen you.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

LoveDreamerPeach [2005-09-21 07:31:01 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful. Angelic..gonna fav!

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

zerocomplex [2005-09-21 01:17:40 +0000 UTC]

That's how I lost my job, I never gave up film, and lost the workflow battle.


This is beautiful, everything about it, especially the tight dof, its enchanting with the textured color tone, well done.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ennil In reply to zerocomplex [2005-09-23 14:37:40 +0000 UTC]

I mean I love film, I love using it and checking the negative after the developpment but with fashion shots it's just doesn't work, I might have lost a whole day of photoshoot because I didn't bring my digital with me. What I find useful is to keep a film camera next to me, and take some pictures with it which I think would look great on film.

Thanks hun.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Ciril [2005-09-19 17:07:07 +0000 UTC]

what a great portrait! well done. you have captured really incredible look of her. her eyes are just amazing.... and i like all that whiteness around with all those details of the bed, her clothes.
beautiful work.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Freddy99 [2005-09-19 16:44:58 +0000 UTC]

Wow, I was just thinking of you Ennil and then you submit a new deviaton. *glomps* It's beautiful.

Freddy.

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 1

ennil In reply to Freddy99 [2005-09-19 17:29:32 +0000 UTC]

Now that's a coincedence

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0

Sting1 [2005-09-19 16:44:07 +0000 UTC]

That's a beautiful photo

πŸ‘: 0 ⏩: 0