Comments: 10
theropod1 [2013-01-05 11:06:18 +0000 UTC]
I tought it was 2m at maximum? Was there a larger specimen found?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EoFauna In reply to theropod1 [2013-01-07 08:07:09 +0000 UTC]
Hi theropod1
No, in fact, there are some specimens bigger, the paratype remains for example, indicates an animal of nearly 3 meters in length.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Sketchy-raptor In reply to EoFauna [2016-08-25 21:41:54 +0000 UTC]
Reawakening an old thread here, but just curious. What is the specimen number of the Velociraptor mongoliensis paratype?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EoFauna In reply to Sketchy-raptor [2016-10-03 07:41:54 +0000 UTC]
Sorry for the late replay: AMNH 6518
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
theropod1 In reply to EoFauna [2013-01-21 15:55:19 +0000 UTC]
I wasn´t aware of that. You are not referring to "V" antirrhopus, are you? I never heard of a V. mongoliensis or osmolskae that big...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EoFauna In reply to theropod1 [2013-01-22 14:46:46 +0000 UTC]
We are referring to V.mongoliensis. One of the most complete specimens, IGM 100/986, indicates a 2.5 m long animal in the flesh.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theropod1 In reply to EoFauna [2013-01-23 12:35:08 +0000 UTC]
How much would it have massed? One usually ready 15kg, but that´s certainloy too little if there where such large individuals.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
EoFauna In reply to theropod1 [2013-01-23 13:27:02 +0000 UTC]
Over 25 kg.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
theropod1 In reply to EoFauna [2013-01-23 13:47:04 +0000 UTC]
very interesting, thanks!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0