HOME | DD
errorer90 — Tiger I
Published: 2013-03-07 11:27:45 +0000 UTC; Views: 969; Favourites: 31; Downloads: 7
Redirect to original
Description
Tiger I is the common name of a German heavy tank developed in 1942 and used in World War II. The final official German designation was Panzerkampfwagen VI Tiger Ausf.E, often shortened to Tiger.This one took me about 9 hours to complete...
Related content
Comments: 21
Looks superb to me 
Som stuff which could be improved: The iddler wheel at the back, looks like the one in the front way too much, it has a different design. And the drivers hatch should be more to the right from my view point, too much in the middle at the moment
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I should have requested critique on this one
I totally agree with you, but as it may look even "uglier" if I make some correction to it, so I'll leave it as it is
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Dam that's pretty awesome I should say. Heck, Tiger I is 1 of my most fav German WWII tanks of all time. But my most 2 fav German WWII tanks of all time is the Tiger I and the Panzer III. Panzer III is pretty cool of how the way its shaped of its chassis and how its made as well, and same goes 4 the Tiger I as well. But I gotta say, the Tiger I had a huge pack a punch of firepower on it. I agree on that.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks!
I gotta say, although it was over-engineered (German engineers used expensive and labour intensive materials and production methods for the construction of this tank, and it was also very time-consuming to produce such a tank), but anyway, they managed to create a "monster" for the battlefield!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Np.
Yea, -scuffs- I agree. The Germans did use a lot of resources 2 build a Tiger I and also had 2 pay a lot of $ in order 2 build that bigboy. And heck yea, they sure did create a big monster there on the battlefield. Heck, that thing was like unstoppable 2 the USA team, and the USA didn't know how 2 destroy it but until later on they knew where its weak points r at. I can't remember exactly where the Tiger I's weak spot was at but the USA finally manage 2 destroy the Tiger I, bcuz they founded out its weak spot. Maybe below or back part of the treads, I can't really remember exactly.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If I'm not mistaken its weak spots were at the front (the lowest part of the front armor), it also had a weak side armor, especially the ammo rack and the back part (the engine), as you said - the back part of the treads.
But regardless of its weak spots, it was a heavy tank which demanded huge efforts to destroy. Soldiers had to approach this tank (lower the distance) somehow, so they would have more chances to hit its weak spots.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ah, I didn't even realize that. Usually most of the time that tanks that r made of there strongest part area's would b the front part since they go in2 straight 4ward on the battlefield, if u know what I mean that is. But yea, usually there mostly strong in the front and not weak at all in the front. But as 4 the Russian tanks, there weakest part is there back mostly. But all tanks backs r all a weak spot, but during WWII that time, the Russian's didn't rely on the rear parts of there tanks. But all they wanted was just 2go through straight 4ward in2 the battlefield, as such as the German's, they equal out there armor parts in different areas of they tanks and same goes 4 the USA as well. But as usual (like I said), the Russian's (or U.S.S.R.) were only meant 2go 4ward in the battlefield. But as also the Russians did make there side armor really thick so that it can b equal 2 the front. I don't know why could they at least put the same armor on the rear so they can equal it out evenly but that's just how they created there tanks that way, which I don't understand why they wouldn't added armor in the rear which is my question. Have 2 look that up I guess.
Sry 4 the long typing, its a habit of me doing that, sry bro.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
very nice. I do stuff like this too, just pencil and a ruler.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, I used only a pencil and ruler
Thank you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
incredible quality. this picture says a lot about the artist
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
If u draw this by hand then I'm speechless nothing to say ( omggggggggggg omgggggggggg)
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Thanks!
Yeah, only by hand and used only simple pencil. It was a hard and time-consuming work, but somehow I managed to accomplish it (:
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
