HOME | DD
etchepare β Cathares study 22
Published: 2008-04-02 19:17:35 +0000 UTC; Views: 4199; Favourites: 170; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description
image from my current work "Cathares. In the memory of stones"[link]
France / Caunes-Minervois abbey - March 2008
>Go here to buy a limited fine-art signed print
Β© Alain Etchepare. All rights reserved. My images may not be reproduced without my permission.
Related content
Comments: 46
Featured in my "hip to be square" journal. Have a nice day!
π: 0 β©: 0
it's obvious from this shot that you really know what your doing, truely inspiring!
π: 0 β©: 0
Le ciel donne un contraste superbe avec l'ancienne architecture
π: 0 β©: 1
I didn't think this series can get any better, but you proved me wrong. 
This one is the strongest so far, in my opinion.
π: 0 β©: 1
this makes me dream...
an awesome my dearest
π: 0 β©: 1
I love these long exposures--really beautiful. I like the way it makes the buildings seem timeless against an ephemeral sky.
π: 0 β©: 1
that lighting coming down is amazing - love it
π: 0 β©: 0
Amazing work as always! The sky looks great
π: 0 β©: 0
simply delightful. 
π: 0 β©: 1
I am always amazed at how you capture such beauty!
π: 0 β©: 0
bellissima
potrebbe essere la copertina di un disco dei dead can dance
π: 0 β©: 1
[link]
[link]
[link]
π: 0 β©: 0
can I ask you which lens do you use Alain?
I'm ready to buy the 5D, and I have 17-40 class L.... do you think it is enought good?
π: 0 β©: 1
yes of course
I'm using 16-35 f2.8 L canon
I dint use 17-40, but i believe that Michel Rajkovik use it, and i believe he is satisfied
Very good news for you for 5D
π: 0 β©: 1
ehehh I really hope I can have it in 15 days
I HOPE alain.... but otherwise I feat I m not good enought.
can I ask you for advice??
π: 0 β©: 2
about my lens ? yes
I'm satisfied by this lens, and by 24-105 f4 L too, both of are very good.
But you must know that the last version of 16-35 is with 82mm diameter, and maybe any filter exist for this lens, very bad feeling. Mine is old version, with little more less quality, but i can use filter.
π: 0 β©: 1
mine is 77mm
very expensive fiters -.-
π: 0 β©: 0
i was interested to note that marc adamus [link] moved from the 17-40 to the 16-35 - he rated the 16-35 as the much better lens. my 2c
π: 0 β©: 1
π: 0 β©: 1
marc did produce amazing results with the 17-40 as well. i cannot remember exactly when he posted his rationale for transferring to the 16-35 but it's there somewhere. and given the quality of your work, what you have now is evidently a good tool!
π: 0 β©: 1