Comments: 16
goldenEden [2009-07-17 17:33:33 +0000 UTC]
Agreed most tutorials only covers the basic on how That person draws wolf, which could be anantomily incorrect, but atleast you can get a just on the basic idea.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Silver-Sundog [2009-07-17 15:35:29 +0000 UTC]
Well done! Good points.
Also....
NOOO YOU CAN'T DIE THE WAR IS OVER!! XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
PantheraCorax [2009-07-17 15:23:14 +0000 UTC]
ah, some wonderful points here 8D
I've actually gotten some more photo refs online with the different subspecies because I found a wolf height chart on =tanathe 's page. ^^ Introduced me to a lot of different anatomy and scales too 8D
Great job showing the most different body types in your drawing too ^^ Tis very helpful >w<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
metakatsztro [2009-07-17 08:40:38 +0000 UTC]
I love you for doing this.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
whisperpntr [2009-07-17 08:05:10 +0000 UTC]
I had to read what you wrote several times to realize what your point was and that it wasn't that wolf tutorials all suck, but that photos are more accurate as well as drawing from life.
In that aspect, yes agree with your statement, though I really recommend that you change your title not to mislead others into feeling that you think all wolf tutorials are WRONG and BAD unless you feel that way.
Also I have to add that even if a tutorial drew subspecies it could still be anatomically incorrect if it just focused on details rather than the overall.
Why the good animal anatomy books help is because they teach you construction. They teach you how to build to a reasonably anatomically correct animal and also how to draw from life better.
In this view point they are not wrong and show the underlying construction and movement, as it will help viewers draw better.
That is the point of animal tutorials out there, at least the ones that aren't trying to prove to the world that "I draw awesome and this is how".
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
fatakita In reply to whisperpntr [2009-07-17 19:44:41 +0000 UTC]
ok, just the fyi haha i changed the title and added your comment in the description bar [8 (with credit of course). my computer was acting up last night otherwise i'd have it done sooner. thanks for the input!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fatakita In reply to whisperpntr [2009-07-17 08:57:11 +0000 UTC]
i understand a lot of what you said, and i probably would of included it if i wasn't so afraid of length. i just made the title as a more of an eye catching thing rather than how i feel. you're right about me changing it.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fatakita In reply to DiamondEden [2009-07-17 07:18:58 +0000 UTC]
you cna't learn exactly what a good artist knows unless you work to become one yourself, is what i think.
i agree with some of your stuff and yeah idk maybe it looks like a dingo, both were reffed but quickly i just was here to make a statement. thanks for the comment~
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DaGrblz [2009-07-17 05:55:52 +0000 UTC]
You make a point *sigh* I'm having a crisis of where my story will be placed. With war dogs and wolves together? I wanted it to be in US or somewhere in North America, but let's be realistic. Cause that's not. XDDD I'm just hoping I won't have to change the whole story just for the setting. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
fatakita In reply to DaGrblz [2009-07-17 06:33:54 +0000 UTC]
here, maybe i can help you...
ever heard of pariah dogs? maybe make pariah dogs vs domestic dogs, or pariah dogs vs wolves.
you could even add some jackals in the comic. the jungle landscape could even be pretty interesting to do. here's an example of a beautiful indian wolf: [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0