Comments: 102
miokdik [2012-04-10 00:30:47 +0000 UTC]
what a beautiful woman. love the pose and that face!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
LucidImages [2012-01-22 02:11:19 +0000 UTC]
Nice tones.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
CRIPPLA [2012-01-21 06:20:30 +0000 UTC]
youre beautiful lady...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
YourMomsMustache [2012-01-21 00:47:50 +0000 UTC]
I like how natural her body (breasts especially) looks, but her face just seems so plastic. She's pretty, but would be absolutely beautiful with less makeup on and without the duck lips.....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MarcusFalden [2012-01-21 00:39:29 +0000 UTC]
what are these nude shots for?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Palibyte [2012-01-21 00:18:13 +0000 UTC]
The dude didn't put this on the front page, you did, so stop bitching. If someone is a beginner artist and a crap drawing gets on front page, it's not his fault, its yours for clicking on it and boosting it up. Seriously, if you clicked on it, then it's only your fault.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Z88 [2012-01-21 00:06:37 +0000 UTC]
too much photoshop on face
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
spacezillazon [2012-01-21 00:06:20 +0000 UTC]
she's very pretty girl good skin tone and pose well done on it
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
anname219 [2012-01-20 23:44:34 +0000 UTC]
I like her face and skin tone but.... her arms are just so awkwardly placed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
DeskDeru [2012-01-20 23:06:00 +0000 UTC]
What crap...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
dolphin-mask [2012-01-20 23:05:40 +0000 UTC]
picture of a topless girl =/= art. it looks like this shot was taken in a public bathroom.
"artistic" nude indeed.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
wolfie157 [2012-01-20 22:57:42 +0000 UTC]
people are so funny. the reason these pics make it to the front page is because enough people are up in arms over it, viewing it, commenting just to say its not art until it gets there. and everyone wonders why and gets mad about it? its a basic principle, don't like it - don't look at it. commenting to say it doesn't belong on the front page only helps get it/keep it there. Anyway, similar to what others have said, I don't think this is one of your better shots, i like others in your gallery better. but is every piece that every artist makes bloody brilliant every time? no. so lets all not pretend we are a picture of perfection.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
RoyalFlowerGarden [2012-01-20 22:53:42 +0000 UTC]
so beautiful. nicely done.. forget the haters... most of them don't have a college education and are ignorant pricks because the only thing they know about the human body is what their Christian mommy and daddy spoon fed to them in the high chair.
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
Psychothrone In reply to RoyalFlowerGarden [2012-03-07 14:14:46 +0000 UTC]
I was with you there until "forget the haters", then you started hating. Big time.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
fiona-elizabeth In reply to RoyalFlowerGarden [2012-01-21 00:27:47 +0000 UTC]
It means they agree with you so completely, the only word that can articulate it is an exclamation of 'THIS'.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
KitCatKat13 [2012-01-20 22:43:35 +0000 UTC]
The comment above the comment above me.
THIS is why we can't have nice things.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
N1ghTw4lk3r666 [2012-01-20 22:25:27 +0000 UTC]
wow nice fukin BBOOOBS i LOVE that ( . ) ( . )
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yoraeryu In reply to N1ghTw4lk3r666 [2012-01-21 00:45:38 +0000 UTC]
^^^^
THIS is why we have tits and vaginas all over the front page. Too many horny kids or middle-aged men favoriting and viewing and sharing and fapping to it. No offense to you personally, N1ghT.
That's really the only reason pictures with girls showing off their tits and/or vagina get on the front page... Fap material because they don't want to pay for porn.
Its a nice photo, but as others have said, I see a bunch of 'shopping... As well as the pose makes her shoulders look HUGE. HUGE, I tell you!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XxnoitcelferxX [2012-01-20 22:17:04 +0000 UTC]
Starting to seem like people bitch about these kinds of pics just to feel good when others applaud them. Nudes are old, they're not gonna go anywhere so why waste your time? It's just a naked body, we all know that this stuff can be filtered out, the settings are there and you all know that leaving it open is going to show you this stuff. The people who run DA know you all like to get butt hurt over some skin, just go bother them some more cause that's the only way you might see changes. I'm sure someone will comment me with something like "i'm not offended by skin but blah blah blah" It doesn't matter how tasteful the pic or pretty the girl or hot the guy someone always gets offended on here over a nip vag or weenie. There's more art websites out there that don't have this stuff at all, you can always visit those till DA fixes your problems.
👍: 0 ⏩: 3
Yoraeryu In reply to XxnoitcelferxX [2012-01-21 00:50:02 +0000 UTC]
The problem I have is that there are a whole bunch of non-tasteful, poor-quality, nudity for the sake of nudity photos on the front page.
The only reason they're popular is because of tits or vaginas popping out. Not because its a good photo, but because of jiggly bits.
Also, find me one front-page picture of a well-done male nude photo... Hell, find me one of a male nude photo on the front page, period. The dA staff have nothing against tits or vaginas, but if there's a penis involved CALL IN THE BRIGADE! BAN! BAN! BAN!
I think there was ONE male nude in the past 4-5 months on the front page. I honestly can't remember anything past that.
dA people are so sexist. :<
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
starshinedaydream In reply to XxnoitcelferxX [2012-01-20 22:27:46 +0000 UTC]
and you write this comment just to feel good when others applaud or bitch about this pic
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluffyLover1986 In reply to XxnoitcelferxX [2012-01-20 22:23:47 +0000 UTC]
If you think all nudes are created equal, you need to get with the times. Look through my favs gallery and tell me that again.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
XxnoitcelferxX In reply to FluffyLover1986 [2012-01-20 22:28:56 +0000 UTC]
Never said equal, just don't care enough about them to make a big stink over them like the people complaining. Personally i'd rather see a pretty face then a full nude. Hell girls in thier underwear are sexier most the time then full nude. Before you ask why did I click the pic then, I did cause she looked pretty in the thumbnail and also cause I can.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Axlazu [2012-01-20 22:15:49 +0000 UTC]
I'm sorry, but this isn't artistic in the slightest.
the other ones you've uploaded, beautifully done.
but this...this doesn't belong....
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
roses-and-phantoms [2012-01-20 22:15:31 +0000 UTC]
I wish more people would focus more on art on THIS website instead of jacking off. If you want porn, go to a website for it, but leave it out of DA.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
galactica1actual [2012-01-20 22:15:04 +0000 UTC]
Where do some of you get off saying this isn't art? Your composition is lovely and I love your lighting, it really helps make the skin tone pop.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
NuopiNuopi [2012-01-20 22:10:47 +0000 UTC]
Come on!! This is a art homepage not a porrn webbsite
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
crris4 [2012-01-20 22:05:47 +0000 UTC]
Well...thats a great way to start a evening...going to deviant and seeing this as popular...
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Sigma-From-KOR In reply to DecoPinkDingo [2012-01-21 03:10:37 +0000 UTC]
Well...that too.
still, a half naked woman hardly qualifies as art.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DecoPinkDingo In reply to Sigma-From-KOR [2012-01-21 05:08:12 +0000 UTC]
it could be argued that everything created is art and i somewhat grudgingly agree with that but that does not mean in any way its artistic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Sigma-From-KOR In reply to DecoPinkDingo [2012-01-21 16:50:55 +0000 UTC]
It might have to do with the narrow minded morons who look at nudity and are all like "heheheh...boobs".
Maybe THATS what's annoying me most. I don't consider it art, but hey to each his own.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
DecoPinkDingo In reply to Sigma-From-KOR [2012-01-21 17:29:53 +0000 UTC]
yes! i know exactly what you mean. its not the photography's fault there are idiots that push this garbage to the front page. (bad vag shots are not the only bad photography on DA) if you saw this just while searching youd just roll your eyes but when it makes it to the front page your mind just goes "what? oh hell no"
we just have to remember that 'popular' does not equal 'good'. i mean, look at lady gaga.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
| Next =>