HOME | DD

fieldsofjoy — Lifeless [NSFW]

Published: 2005-12-16 00:10:00 +0000 UTC; Views: 10955; Favourites: 314; Downloads: 1357
Redirect to original
Description I really love the expression in this photograph. The rest of my body could use some work. AHEM. workout.

Photography by Stan Wigmore
Related content
Comments: 50

oldvart1 [2022-06-02 19:24:08 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Jan-K-Fotografie [2013-03-27 06:40:45 +0000 UTC]

Beautifully portrayed!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ipaintu [2013-03-23 17:49:44 +0000 UTC]

delicious

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Dissent-Is-Cool [2011-12-03 13:11:37 +0000 UTC]

Lifeless? I see plenty of life here!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

KW-Scott [2011-04-24 03:20:16 +0000 UTC]

Coy perhaps but not lifeless The expression is cool but you say you need a workout? Nah besides treadmills are for hamsters

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

moosicman45 [2010-10-29 22:59:21 +0000 UTC]

Naah think your beautiful form the head down. Definitely like the expression

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Zigholtul88 [2010-08-28 18:21:32 +0000 UTC]

Workout!? Complete and utter bullocks, you look magnificent here.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SolidSnake209 [2010-06-29 20:03:48 +0000 UTC]

so naturally beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Anominom [2010-03-02 12:02:02 +0000 UTC]

Reminds me of Greek statues

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Shadamachaeon [2010-02-25 16:51:21 +0000 UTC]

I like this picture!
Don't worry,you don't need a workout, you're perfectly fine the way you are.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

helloworld2358 [2010-01-24 04:15:05 +0000 UTC]

Even though the lighting is off it's a good picture because you look so good. Also, your skin is NOT too pale.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

breaker-of-reality7 [2009-06-12 05:50:52 +0000 UTC]

Workout? Don't bother, all of your shots are wonderful as you are!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Daemonox [2008-10-04 17:43:03 +0000 UTC]

BrotherHades has a point the lighting of this shot does no justice and makes the model (who happens to be a very beautiful woman) look pale. Better lighting and background would be a boone. But dont change the model

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mooode1 [2007-09-30 04:44:46 +0000 UTC]

loool very nice

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

toxicneoxide [2007-01-27 09:33:11 +0000 UTC]

Not exaggerating, one of the most beautiful pictures I have ever seen.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Eddy1948 [2006-11-30 18:07:27 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

JoshClarkeDraws [2006-08-27 20:16:37 +0000 UTC]

Nothing wrong there, ma'am... nothing at all!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

comparsian [2006-08-25 14:22:20 +0000 UTC]

nice work... cool photo. U've amazing breasts...I must agree

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

markramstead [2006-08-14 03:24:18 +0000 UTC]

Your a beauty allright!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

MadMacks [2006-08-07 12:00:36 +0000 UTC]

My My Dear Gwendelin-Artanis. I see/know your meaning in your photograph, but I see so so much more! Your voluptuousness is soooo refreshing to see! Your expression is priceless innocence but in your eyes and poses I see complexity! Your body is incredible in the extreme sense of the word! I love your "skin of choice is lesbian", I can understand that for beautiful women to love/a beautiful women is to say simply, beautiful! I am a heterosexual man & absolutely LOVE women!! MOST women are beautiful, meaning with all of the attributes that make a good person good. Especially in the US, so much is directed toward physical beauty that so many people, whether homo/hetero are lost in a dry desert of shallow, flat, bland, non-personal-ality-less beauties!! These exceptions from the MOST I speak of, have men & women looking for someone they will never find because they are not looking in the right place! But the lesbians I know, and pretty much in general I think, are much more inclined to be attracted to the whole person. Not necessarily the pretty face & lovely body, if they are & have one respectively, but I admire & respect the strength and grace of women who do not go toward the conventional way of thinking & DO go where their hearts lead them. I think I am different than most other men because of my thought process in this way. I am proud in my respect, self-respect, attitude & thoughtfulness because this is how I was raised. I practice it every day of my life, continually learning about human nature and the drive that makes us who & what we are! This is what came to mind when saw your photo & read your "skin of choice" preference. Which is brave to say in the non-artistic world, however things are achangin! Like someone said, (do you know who by any chance?) a picture/photo tells a 1000 words. Well, it tells me a lot more than that & makes me feel about as many emotions as well! My 1000 words are almost tallied up and my last profound inspiration is to say that I LOVE BEAUTIFUL WOMEN! Most of these, the ones that I have praised for their, caring, non-judgemental attitudes that compliment their way of life, all of these women that I speak of in this favorable, positive manner, whatever their external, physical looks are all simply said, truly beautiful in the dark! Sure seems a lot of stuff spilling from my mouth but is the way I am, this is what I am & this is what I want to be! Your gallery is fantastic and so are you! Lovingly & respectfully Mark McNeil

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

toxicneoxide [2006-03-30 06:58:57 +0000 UTC]

So...very..beautiful...I like the way your hair is tied back.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caine870 [2006-01-25 22:32:49 +0000 UTC]

DOn't work out ever....you are absolutely perfect just the way you are.......It is nice to see a perfectly developed beautiful woman.....with no visible bones protruding.....Don't mess with perfection.......I would crawl on my hands and knees through 5 miles of broken glass just to be in the same room with a beauty like you.....


Just my $.02

Caine

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

caine870 [2006-01-25 22:32:19 +0000 UTC]

DOn't work out ever....you are absolutely perfect just the way you are.......It is nice to see a perfectly developed beautiful woman.....with no visible bones protruding.....Don't mess with perfection.......I would crawl on my hands and knees through 5 miles of broken glass just to be in the same room with a beauty like you.....


Just my $.02

Caine

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

5Y5TemFaiLurE [2006-01-24 23:00:44 +0000 UTC]

innocent and cute, but the lighting is not good - from my point of view- it shows you too pale, but you as a model is great, the work needed to this image have to be done by a good photographer, and btw you don't need to work out

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

mrshan [2006-01-07 12:19:32 +0000 UTC]

I think you are lovely, except that me personaly i would've preffered more tones . . i mean the lighting effects, which falls under the photographer's creativity.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

loadsatequila [2006-01-06 15:57:25 +0000 UTC]

great model although im sorry to say substandard photographer

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

wildkarrde [2005-12-29 19:06:43 +0000 UTC]

Wow, you are lovely! I dont' think you need to work out as much as you think you do. Just maintain that figure, I think you look great.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Yousry-Aref [2005-12-26 23:58:51 +0000 UTC]

huge wow indeed

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

achipps [2005-12-23 21:02:17 +0000 UTC]

I made a psd file so you can play with the background. I sent it by e-mail, but don't know if it is too big.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ixeo [2005-12-23 09:44:07 +0000 UTC]

Very nice shot.
I love the pose and the almost "high-key" lighting...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

poetafingitore [2005-12-22 21:01:02 +0000 UTC]

Nice pose and body expression!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

TALRi [2005-12-22 10:08:33 +0000 UTC]

Really nice work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

slowhand [2005-12-22 09:46:39 +0000 UTC]

no !
keep it like it is.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

goldstyles [2005-12-17 16:02:52 +0000 UTC]

love you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bound-eye [2005-12-17 02:12:29 +0000 UTC]

I think just about all of us could use extra workout time, but in my eyes you are looking good, thanks for sharing this photo.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Leviathon1880-1980 [2005-12-16 19:02:02 +0000 UTC]

I am always direct in my comments, for that I apologise but with that being said you have immaculate breasts.

There is also something inherently different about your looks.

Just so damn beautiful...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

bipeds [2005-12-16 13:59:30 +0000 UTC]

hm, i think u could use some workout as well.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

BrotherHades [2005-12-16 07:08:12 +0000 UTC]

I agree. You are a very beautiful woman with exquisite curves.
That being said this image could use some work. The lighting on the chest and breasts washes out the skin tone and leaves very little contrast between the skin and background. If it was not for the shoulder and arms I couls have just said you have a pale skintone but there is more color to them than on the torso.

Overall i think it is a lovely model in sub par lighting conditions and bad choice of background.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fieldsofjoy In reply to BrotherHades [2005-12-16 07:17:49 +0000 UTC]

Agreed.

I am actually very pale everywhere, but the lighting did weird things to different parts of my skin. Oh well. I put them up more for the modeling than the lighting/backdrops.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrotherHades In reply to fieldsofjoy [2005-12-16 07:27:33 +0000 UTC]

I just love the pose on it. If you would not mind Iwould love to do some work on it in PS. I think there is some potential in it if the previously mentioned aspects are fixed.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fieldsofjoy In reply to BrotherHades [2005-12-16 07:35:23 +0000 UTC]

By all means, go ahead.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

BrotherHades In reply to fieldsofjoy [2005-12-16 08:23:48 +0000 UTC]

Thanks!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Obliwar18 [2005-12-16 02:21:40 +0000 UTC]

Wow, beautiful. I agree with the last guy/gal about curves and your curves are incredible.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NeoAizza [2005-12-16 00:49:35 +0000 UTC]

Very nice and natural- I wouldn't change a thing. Women should have curves.

Keep up the good work

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

LordGhost [2005-12-16 00:25:20 +0000 UTC]

I have to say that, as a model, you need to find a better quality photographer. This gentleman's style is a bit lacking.

A good photographer can bring out depth from any model. I've seen excellent pictures of you with vast depth. This series of photos of you is...to be polite...lacking.

Trust me, your figure, your looks, your poses are not lacking. A photographer who can guide you to perfect poses and places you into proper settings is what you're lacking at this level of your career.

You, as a model, are not what's lacking in this series.

Happy Holidays,
LordGhost

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fieldsofjoy In reply to LordGhost [2005-12-16 00:49:41 +0000 UTC]

No, I don't take any offense to this at all. I completely agree with you. The photographs came out for good stock stuff, but as for artistic? Nah. It needs better backdrops. Totally agreed! If I were better at Photoshop I would do something with them myself.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LordGhost In reply to fieldsofjoy [2005-12-16 00:54:24 +0000 UTC]

Well toss some up for stock and watch people flock to mod them.

Hell, I'd consider doing so if I was any good at photomanip. I've only done 2, only 1 of which I'm happy with, and even that one will make you dizzy if you stare at it too long.

Happy Holidays,
LordGhost

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fieldsofjoy In reply to LordGhost [2005-12-16 00:58:08 +0000 UTC]

Well, I'm pretty okay at photomanip, but i wouldn't know what to do with them besides blending, haha. Maybe I'll be able to use some of them for a school project at some point. That would be cool.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

LordGhost In reply to fieldsofjoy [2005-12-16 02:57:43 +0000 UTC]

See, I personally think I suck at it, so I just practise in silence and only post if I do something I consider worthy...*checks gallery*

Which explains why I have 2 up. The first two I ever did...yeah...



Happy Holidays,
LordGhost

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

karter [2005-12-16 00:19:48 +0000 UTC]

This is a really beautiful picture.

Kudos to you and Mr. Wigmore.

(As for the workout, don't go nuts. You have a great figure)

👍: 0 ⏩: 0