Comments: 48
Godzilla278 [2019-11-05 03:42:59 +0000 UTC]
Cute by evil 🦹♀️
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Redbroney115 [2017-09-07 14:56:33 +0000 UTC]
Limestone would fit to be a cruel political officer
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Coolcat800 [2017-04-16 19:35:17 +0000 UTC]
This looks cool! I would like to try this game if it was real!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
btryan [2015-11-30 14:03:53 +0000 UTC]
Red Equestria 2: Heroes of Starlight-grad? (a reference to Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad)
I was hoping that Sombra timeline was more WW2 or WW1-ish.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Anybronym0ti0n [2015-11-20 22:14:00 +0000 UTC]
Presumo que seja inspirado no Men of War?
Provavelmente escolheria a Marble, stealth ist gut!
De qualquer forma, estes desenhos estão uma delícia cara!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to Anybronym0ti0n [2015-11-20 23:18:28 +0000 UTC]
Bem, mais ou menos. A Maud de fato sim, mas no MoW não tem outros uniformes soviéticos além do bege.
Eu iria com a Pinkie. Ela é a mais rápida e tem uma StG44. Eu jogo FPS pra sair rushando estilo CoD.
Vlw pelo comentário relaxante.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anybronym0ti0n In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-21 18:49:57 +0000 UTC]
Ayy, eu sou mais de RTSs, mas também adoro FPSs, mas têm de ser bem feitos.
Tu sabes do meme do Pai de Família?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to Anybronym0ti0n [2015-11-21 19:03:30 +0000 UTC]
Eu tbm prefiro RTSs. Se fosse um estilo MoW ou C&C, eu iria usar Mauds para defesa, com Limestones dando boost nelas, e usar Pinkies e Marbles para atacar.
É um dos memes mais famosos do Brasil xD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Anybronym0ti0n In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-22 00:49:57 +0000 UTC]
Ya boa estratégia, eu normalmente no MoW uso veiculos combinados com tanques, os tanques a darem suporte e os veiculos (normalmemte opels que pedi "emprestado" aos alemães, é o veiculo de tranporte mais comum) deixam logo sair tropas e peças de artilharia, em dez segundos certos, tenho a minha frente de ataque pronta.
Ayy, cá em Portugal só dão importância ao Guina devido ao Ocolast, o Jailson e os outros ficam a na sombra, é uma pena porque trata-se do meme mais delicioso do mundo.
Alias sou tão fanatico por esse meme que um dia a jogar MoW, depois de completar a missão fiquei mais um tempo no jogo a fazer palhaçada, então fiz isto: pus um soldado na zona da minha defesa e um opel com uma peça de artilharia na reserva, o condutor leva o opel para ao pé do soldado na linha de frente e diz: Era essa peça que vc queria?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
kwendynew [2015-11-20 15:14:48 +0000 UTC]
Why choose one if you can play a tactical game and use them as a squad?
Also, I wasn't sure if I should note it, but how do you imagine Lime's "ability" work? It was kinda passable in over-the-top Warhammer universe, but this seem different.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to kwendynew [2015-11-20 23:14:06 +0000 UTC]
Well, if it was a RTS game, I would use Mauds for base defence, with a Limestone boosting them, and keep sending squads of 2-3 Pinkies and 3-4 Marbles to attack until I have better units.
The only actual abilities she has are the Katyusha, commanding vehicles and shooting one ally. The rest are, like you see, passive/automatic.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kwendynew In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-21 03:52:20 +0000 UTC]
So I am guessing you are not very familliar with tactical games like Commandos or Silent Storm?
I meant shooting ally. Makes no sense.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to kwendynew [2015-11-21 13:35:49 +0000 UTC]
No. Never heard of them.
It makes according to history. Soviet generals shoot allied soldiers (usually conscripts) to make the others not retreat and fight to death.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
kwendynew In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-21 15:25:24 +0000 UTC]
Well, whole genre of games passed through you.
Deserter, not ally. The way you put it is utterly ridiculous.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
MintyMousyX [2015-11-19 19:48:54 +0000 UTC]
Todas as quatro estão incríveis, mas se for pra escolher uma, fico com a Marble Pie. Submetralhadoras podem não ser muito eficientes comparadas com metralhadoras e rifles automáticos, mas são eficientes em média e curta distâncias.
Fora que a Marble Pie ficou muito bom com o uniforme dela. =3
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to MintyMousyX [2015-11-20 23:20:16 +0000 UTC]
Eu prefiro a Pinkie. Fuzis de assalto fazem mais o meu estilo "corre e atira"
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
zeke2426 [2015-11-17 02:27:17 +0000 UTC]
I choose pinkie
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
et450 [2015-11-17 02:17:19 +0000 UTC]
marble hands down!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rainbowdasher98 [2015-11-17 01:35:30 +0000 UTC]
If this were a game, I'd go with Marble, as I'm best with stealth.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to rainbowdasher98 [2015-11-17 18:03:07 +0000 UTC]
I would go with Pinkie. I don't like stealth and love to run-and-gun
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rainbowdasher98 In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-17 20:07:35 +0000 UTC]
I like run-and-gun fine enough but I'm really bad at it XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rainbowdasher98 In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-17 20:41:38 +0000 UTC]
Lol I could just imagine you trying to play Metal Gear or Dishonored and me trying to play CoD or Halo XD would not end very well
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
rainbowdasher98 In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-17 23:55:19 +0000 UTC]
oh I meant like, in general, not together. But that would be cool too! Now, idk if this is true, but I THINK people can still friend each other on PSN even if one guy has a PS4 and the other has a PS3. So, would you mind if I asked for your PSN so I can friend you?
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
ShadowRose5 [2015-11-17 01:06:20 +0000 UTC]
Marble
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
juninho123565 [2015-11-17 01:01:25 +0000 UTC]
se isso for um jogo, EU QUERO JOGAR
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Guy-the-Phantom [2015-11-17 00:42:51 +0000 UTC]
Marble's style seems to fit better for me. XD
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to Guy-the-Phantom [2015-11-17 18:00:31 +0000 UTC]
I think I would go with Pinkie. The PPSh might have a higher fire rate but the STG have range and accuracy.
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
H1R0H1T0 [2015-11-16 23:32:20 +0000 UTC]
This should totally be a game; I would play it!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to H1R0H1T0 [2015-11-16 23:53:39 +0000 UTC]
You're not the only one
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
discospig In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-16 23:53:10 +0000 UTC]
No prob Leo! How's your evening going?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
FluttzKrieg In reply to discospig [2015-11-17 00:00:02 +0000 UTC]
I know, right? Good is good!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
discospig In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-17 00:01:26 +0000 UTC]
I'd even say good is great!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
discospig In reply to FluttzKrieg [2015-11-17 00:30:30 +0000 UTC]
Well, I'd say awesome is good! ...And... Good is Splendiforous!
👍: 0 ⏩: 0