HOME | DD

fogke In reply to ??? [2010-10-17 13:31:37 +0000 UTC]

many thanks...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

coolinary-concerns In reply to ??? [2010-10-17 11:25:11 +0000 UTC]

feature. [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to coolinary-concerns [2010-10-17 13:31:52 +0000 UTC]

thank youuu

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

coolinary-concerns In reply to fogke [2010-10-18 10:36:45 +0000 UTC]

pleasure lovely

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to coolinary-concerns [2010-10-19 07:18:05 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fogke In reply to Azleas [2010-10-17 13:34:56 +0000 UTC]

i dont have secrets .. just normal shoot and maybe good postprocess in PS4

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Azleas In reply to fogke [2010-10-18 01:31:05 +0000 UTC]

YEAH! PHOTOSHOP! THIS IS THE ANSWER!!
jajaja
but... could you give me the original picture no compare? because i'm searching a len to buy... and i would like to see diferents shoots of diferent lens...
I'm thinking about: 17-85mm; 85mm; 50mm or 70-300mm What do you think?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to Azleas [2010-10-19 07:19:21 +0000 UTC]

no .. sorry

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Azleas In reply to fogke [2010-10-20 00:53:07 +0000 UTC]

NOOO!! XDXD
ajajja
WHY??? okey...
So... if you don't want to give me the original picture.. Can you answer me what's your opinion about 17-85mm; 85mm; 50mm and 70-300mm?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to Azleas [2010-10-20 08:50:47 +0000 UTC]

17-85 is terrible lens... bad bad bad........ 70-300, tooo.. bad bad bad...

and 50&85mm are great choice with good optical oportunitties

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Azleas In reply to fogke [2010-10-20 23:23:04 +0000 UTC]

why do you say that 17-85 and 70-300 are terrrible lens? This person take the pictures with these 2 lens XD: [link]

and... Sometime did you use those lens?

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to Azleas [2010-10-21 16:49:39 +0000 UTC]

i will never use them, becouse they are terrible.. you must look on original photos and not on postprocess in ps like at your link.. here you are some tests [link]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

alpharomano In reply to ??? [2010-10-16 22:44:12 +0000 UTC]

how many pictures of this perfect model have you!!, thousand i suppose ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to alpharomano [2010-10-17 13:34:25 +0000 UTC]

around 1500 yes

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

alpharomano In reply to fogke [2010-10-17 14:44:28 +0000 UTC]

wow!! it must be exhausted to be your model , even for one week ^^

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to alpharomano [2010-10-19 06:36:09 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Pjoter In reply to ??? [2010-10-16 21:40:31 +0000 UTC]

ze eeeeeeeeeeee chdrž! Uzasne, fascinujuce, zive. Opäť a znova, má hlavný motív silné magnetické účinky! To aby si človek nos roztrepau... Miso, ved tie tvoje fotky ti v galerii zaslintaju a ocapkaju... . No dost silny zazitok, ktory sa priam vryva do pamäti. Modelka je ozaj vyrazna zavriem oci a ona tam je...Tie tvoje fotky sa daju znovu odfotit ale inym sposobom .....Jedna fotka krajšia od druhej. Michal, si zjav na poly fotografickom podla mna...

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

delatour In reply to Pjoter [2010-10-17 13:36:08 +0000 UTC]

bleeeeeee....

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fogke In reply to Pjoter [2010-10-17 13:34:11 +0000 UTC]

cital som to nahlas pred katkou, zacina jej byt zle .... a mysli si ze si sa zblaznil ....


a mne je smiesno, ale asi sa patri podakovat ak to myslis aspon z polovice vazne vazne .....

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Pjoter In reply to fogke [2010-10-18 16:06:43 +0000 UTC]

ale boze sak ja niekedy tak kvetnato Ano maju silny esteticky ucinok tie fotky Myslim to vazne, proste modelky si vies vyberat, atmosferu vies vytvorit...je to podla mna zaujimavy rukopis ako fotis...Modelky a kompozicia su proste pekne, nehovorim ze je pekne fotit len na oko pekne.... A samozrejme moze niekto vytknut ze su nastajlovane, no zamer je zamer a rukopis je rukopis. Tvoje vyjadrenie, zamerne vyjadrenie.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

fogke In reply to Pjoter [2010-10-19 07:19:01 +0000 UTC]

budem mat hore nos teraz...

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fogke In reply to Slawa [2010-10-16 19:49:12 +0000 UTC]

thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

fogke In reply to iHeartRufus [2010-10-16 19:48:45 +0000 UTC]

thank you so much

👍: 0 ⏩: 0