Comments: 49
kamsabi [2012-06-15 19:42:14 +0000 UTC]
nice shot.
π: 0 β©: 0
mquu [2011-06-05 22:33:33 +0000 UTC]
great focus
π: 0 β©: 0
LAPoetry-n-Photo [2011-05-29 05:44:57 +0000 UTC]
f/1.0! so small, so beautiful. great concept
π: 0 β©: 0
Kurahee [2011-05-29 05:07:06 +0000 UTC]
Pretty cool.....
π: 0 β©: 0
dont-judge-bullshit [2011-05-29 04:11:34 +0000 UTC]
very cool. have to say i love the lip-stick
π: 0 β©: 0
tchiseen [2011-05-29 03:10:22 +0000 UTC]
Oooh look at me, I'm artsy I use DOF,
zzz
π: 0 β©: 1
Xadrea In reply to tchiseen [2011-05-29 03:30:35 +0000 UTC]
It's about the composition, not the process, sheesh
π: 0 β©: 0
defense2 [2011-05-29 02:42:09 +0000 UTC]
I wish i would have thought of that for my depth of field assignment.
π: 0 β©: 0
Logas69 [2011-05-28 23:48:34 +0000 UTC]
f1.0?!?!
π: 0 β©: 0
nan-a-mour [2011-05-28 22:06:00 +0000 UTC]
Amazing model.
π: 0 β©: 0
Nyloh [2011-05-28 20:42:05 +0000 UTC]
Pretty cool, I've always liked images where the focus changes like that!
π: 0 β©: 0
StrawberryMilk-Comic [2011-05-28 20:24:22 +0000 UTC]
"Hey, what's that blurry thing in the foregr- oh."
Neat photo, emphasizes the importance of focus in photography or film, so you could almost call it instructional.
π: 0 β©: 0
Imaginary--Thoughts [2011-05-28 19:03:32 +0000 UTC]
I very much like the second version. I can kind of get a feeling of her trying to draw me in from it, whereas.. the first doesn't make me feel anything, I'm just sort of confused by it.
π: 0 β©: 0
ShadowyZman [2011-05-28 18:53:34 +0000 UTC]
Beautiful focal variation!
π: 0 β©: 0
Astralhaze [2011-05-28 16:57:47 +0000 UTC]
Cool.
π: 0 β©: 0
Jace-Z [2011-05-28 16:17:08 +0000 UTC]
"why so serious"
π: 0 β©: 1
AddyGee [2011-05-28 12:56:53 +0000 UTC]
Very good photo :-D
π: 0 β©: 0
fireblow [2011-05-28 09:00:30 +0000 UTC]
this beautiful will look better with a smile
π: 0 β©: 0
OwenBriars [2011-05-28 07:44:31 +0000 UTC]
Very nice emotion to both of these photos.
π: 0 β©: 0
KuroKitteh [2011-05-28 07:42:28 +0000 UTC]
lovely photo!
π: 0 β©: 0
Andurie [2011-05-28 07:20:26 +0000 UTC]
great!
π: 0 β©: 0
BernsBrim In reply to Photono [2011-05-28 15:24:46 +0000 UTC]
Hmm... Maybe it Canon EF 50mm f/1.0L ? How do you think?
π: 0 β©: 0
fotomartinez In reply to Qasedak89 [2011-05-28 15:36:28 +0000 UTC]
I used the lens helios 44M
π: 0 β©: 0
Pinkerator In reply to Qasedak89 [2011-05-28 08:42:31 +0000 UTC]
that's must be veeeery expensive lens with f/1.0 ))
π: 0 β©: 1
frayart In reply to Pinkerator [2011-05-28 19:40:21 +0000 UTC]
helios 44 m is not f/1.0 , it is f/2.0 ,
so exif is fake))
π: 0 β©: 1
Photono In reply to frayart [2011-05-29 18:04:01 +0000 UTC]
:-D my thoughts were going in some kind of this direction.
π: 0 β©: 0