HOME | DD
FractalMonster — Compass Mandala
Published: 2007-03-23 00:41:50 +0000 UTC; Views: 2169; Favourites: 27; Downloads: 255
Redirect to original
Description
From deep in the border of quadratic connectedness locus, i e the Mandelbrot set, far beyond the limit of double precision. Magnification 5.071x10^30. Suppose the whole unmagnified Mandelbrot set has a range of 1 dm. That would mean that having this magnification it would have a range of 5.071x10^29 m. The distance the light travels during one year is 9.461x10^15 m. This would mean that the at this magnification, the Mandelbrot set would have a range of of 5.071x10^29 m/9.461x10^15 m = (5.071 /9.461)x10^(29-15) = 5.3599x10^13 light years. Suppose that the visible universe has a range of about 15 000 000 000 light years. This would mean that the whole Mandelbrot set at this scale would reach 53 599/15x10^9 = 3 573 times outside the visible universe!Generator: fractal eXtreme.
Related content
Comments: 34
UUUWAAAAAA THIS LOOKS SO EPIIIC!!!!!!!! Seriously wow!!!! The colors and the forms are... EPICS!!!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Can just say THANK YOU 
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I don't know what to say - it's simply beautiful, perfect!
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I quite understand you 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yes, I've heard, and I like fractal art - fractals are all around us in the nature, and that is so fascinating... That's real beauty. 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Most software can be downloaded from [link] . Many progs are free, for example Fractal Forge, Xaos, and Fractal Explorer
Maybe these two journals below,
"Which spots belong to the M set?" [link]
"About iterations and basic color routines" [link]
would be of some interest for you. Read all what I've written with an open eager mind
Regarding deep zooms in the Mandelbrot set, if you check out my deviation "Cauliflowerfort" [link] and click the link under "Artist's Comments" you can follow the entire zoom sequence in 28 steps
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ok, thanx a lot for a long comment and explanation - I will see the links, and maybe I'll learn more about fractals...
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
My pleasure
BTW, the image you first faved, [link] , is the deepest zoom in the Mandelbrot set I've published (see Artist's Comments)..
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
My gaze flows through the dimensions of the pattern.
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
That is like explaining the essence of fractals through images. No math required.
PS: Thank you for the 
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, that's the purpose with those illustrations :w00: Also check my journal "Cool Fractal Animations on YouTube" [link]
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Just wanted to share with you that I'm still LOVING this one
I was going to change my backdrop for today and decided not to. I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE IT
I noticed you had done this one in 2007.... how did I miss seeing it before?
So glad it came around again
Keep a smile on
Lillyanna
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hi Lillyanna 
I am VERY honored that you love this one, because it's the largest mandelbrot zoom I ever published (read Artists Comments and also my journal "How big is the Mandelbrot set?" [link] ). As most of my images this image is completely raw without any filter effects. That's the reason why I call me "a Fractal Traveler" rather than a "Fractal Artist"
The reason you haven't seen it is because I have a large gallery and this one was one of my first. Now I've started upload my motives on the Fractal Dreams an Ultra Fractal groups
Regarding deep zooms in the M set, if you check out my deviation "Cauliflowerfort" [link] and click the link under "Artist's Comments" you can follow the entire zoom sequence in 28 steps
Thank you Lillyanna for your kind words
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Hi Ingvar
I LOVE YOUR FRACTALS!!! I have now gone back and looked at every one of them
Keep a smile on
Lillyanna
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Thanks again Elizabeth
👍: 0 ⏩: 2
How long did it take to render the whole fractal?
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Don't remember, but that one was one of my long renderings not 60 hours, but not very far away from it. That's due to the high resolution (8000x6000), but most for the long floating numbers beyond double precision, so instead of using the math chop, software routines where used.
But you don't need to get on that extreme depth in order to find nice intricate patterns
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Ahah, yeah, I know, my pc wouldn't handle it because power in Africa is always down! x'D
Thanks for the answer
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
..and regarding fx, you have to restart from the begging if you brake a rendering 
BTW, here [link] is my other 60 hours rendering. This time cause it's 3D and you have to increase the virtual depth along with the resolution..
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Oh, I've already tried the 3D Mapping, well, it was not useful until now but I'm sure it will be useful in the future
Well, anyways, I'm moving back to Portugal and power there is always up, finally
Rendering can be complete, but I don't think I need those so many pixels, eheh
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Yeah, 3D fractals are a little bit tricky to use. I've written a journal [link] of the las 3D formula of my friend Stig He was the first who, for some years ago wrote rD raytracing formulas for UF (Slijkerman must have been astonished)
Really hope you will feel comfortable in Portugal. Yeah that's overkill if you don't gonna print mega posters
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
I'm gonna grab those formulas immediately! :brb:
I know I won't understand anything, but maybe playing with them will take me somewhere. Hope they don't take too long to render
👍: 0 ⏩: 1
Wish you a good luck. They require some patience. And also some knowledge of what they display
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
Your welcome again its amazing
👍: 0 ⏩: 0
