HOME | DD

FrankGo — Zooey Deschanel

Published: 2012-05-20 20:14:43 +0000 UTC; Views: 4627; Favourites: 89; Downloads: 227
Redirect to original
Description A Sketch
Pencil (2B, 4B, 5B) & Mech.Pencil 2B on A4 Canson Watercolor Paper
Related content
Comments: 39

nev777 [2015-07-27 21:23:56 +0000 UTC]

Hi Frankgo......sorry to be so quiet with comments for so long ...still finding my feet, so to speak..your sketch?  no  way....Your Portrait, very beautiful, what I like about this is the soft, clear finish of the face and balance of light over the portrait..Your work as always is a pleasure to look at and a bench mark to achieve..So happy to watch your work..Will keep up ........Nev

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

binukuttan [2015-05-13 05:42:32 +0000 UTC]

Amazing work

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to binukuttan [2015-06-14 20:46:48 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

NCIS413 [2013-04-06 16:41:47 +0000 UTC]

this is amazing! looks just like a photograph!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SamGleek [2012-08-12 10:03:59 +0000 UTC]

Amazing!!!!!!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ClarkSavage [2012-07-09 02:26:46 +0000 UTC]

WOW!! You captured Zooey's loveliness perfectly.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

En-joyYourLife [2012-06-01 06:00:01 +0000 UTC]

wow, a cool work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

babyonbored [2012-05-27 03:41:01 +0000 UTC]

She's too fucking pretty sometimes, I swear to glob...

Excellent work!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Wytherwing [2012-05-25 11:30:52 +0000 UTC]

very nicely done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

nnicc [2012-05-24 09:40:07 +0000 UTC]

By the way, very very nice portrait

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to nnicc [2012-05-24 12:17:25 +0000 UTC]

and the words came from the master
Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nnicc In reply to FrankGo [2012-06-01 12:13:37 +0000 UTC]

It's not true, but I thank you the same

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to nnicc [2012-06-02 06:18:03 +0000 UTC]

your very welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

dianuchatruchaDLA [2012-05-22 16:45:08 +0000 UTC]

Good light technique on the hair, I'm not so good in that space.
Well done!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to dianuchatruchaDLA [2012-05-24 12:20:17 +0000 UTC]

it's the power of the eraser. Take a lot of practice, you'll be good in the technique and others in very soon
Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

dianuchatruchaDLA In reply to FrankGo [2012-05-25 16:38:32 +0000 UTC]

Oh! You're welcome, I'll practice it, thanks a lot to you.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Payo-X [2012-05-22 03:41:25 +0000 UTC]

Very nicely done. I like your choice of paper, but I think, given the incredible texture and the potential fuzzy quality that it presents, I would have gone with a softer lead or even charcoal. .. and in saying that, I have absolutely no doubt, too, that the scan stole some of that quality. I'll bet the original is amazing.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to Payo-X [2012-05-22 05:09:46 +0000 UTC]

Many thanks bro. I can see that too, and I'm totally agree with you
I have some difficulty with the scanner and camera, they reduce the quality of my works.
Some examples:
- scanner result [link]
- camera result [link]
Could you please give me any suggestion what tools or methods to make it better? or what you usually do to transfer you works to your pc? I really need that.

👍: 0 ⏩: 2

nnicc In reply to FrankGo [2012-05-24 09:39:41 +0000 UTC]

I prefer camera than scanner.
Natural lighting is better for photograph your drawing, but avoid too strong direct sunlight, it could reflect on the graphite. Or you can try to put two lamps of hte same kind on the sides of the drawing.
Another suggestion I can give is that you should take a picture at the maximum distance with the maximum of the zoom. It reduce distortion due to the perspective.
I usually take more than one photo, and then I choose the best. Later I can try to make some adjustment of lighting and levels with my camera program.

Also you can find some more information on these tutorials:
[link]
[link]

Hope it will be useful

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to nnicc [2012-05-24 11:53:58 +0000 UTC]

Thank you for the very useful & helpful links.
I'm building a mini studio for my artworks right now, the two lamps idea is just perfect!!
Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

nnicc In reply to FrankGo [2012-06-01 11:59:21 +0000 UTC]

Even if your studio will be mini, I'm sure it will be great the same.
I've never tried the two lamps, but I red it somewhere.

Cheers

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Payo-X In reply to FrankGo [2012-05-22 06:27:46 +0000 UTC]

I'm not sure my experience with my outdated scanner will translate too much help to you, but I can tell you what I do. I set it for at least 200dpi in a color reflective document setting. If your scanner does a preview scan and offers adjustments, I don't try to do too many adjustments in this pre-scan stage. Do it if you have to but try to let it capture alot of gray, it might even look a little dull, but you'll know when it's definitely has the whole image. Just remember, it's easier to darken the picture in a program than to lighten. I think this leaves more room for adjustment in Photoshop. Leave it in color when you get it to Photoshop. ...(and if you're stitching together scanned parts of a larger image, put it together BEFORE you do adjustments.) ..I play with the "levels" then a little "brightness/contrast" in the adjustment layers palette. Just try to keep the values true. It's REAL easy to blow out the details you're trying to preserve.
..I'm sorry. I feel like I'm not helping at all. I wish you luck, you have loads of talent. If nothing else, go with the Photos of your work.

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to Payo-X [2012-05-24 12:16:21 +0000 UTC]

Noway, your tips is very helpful, thank you it's just I'm not good at Photoshop. The first step always "desaturated" and then I play with the level and brightness/contrast. Lucky me I have a good-friend whom master the Photoshop, most of my artworks here are Photoshopped by him and I'll start take a private lesson from him next month.

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Alkanett [2012-05-21 23:20:56 +0000 UTC]

This is wonderful! Beautiful work <3

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to Alkanett [2012-05-22 05:11:24 +0000 UTC]

Thank you sist

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Alkanett In reply to FrankGo [2012-05-22 14:29:19 +0000 UTC]

You're welcome

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

ArminiusWillabert [2012-05-21 20:19:25 +0000 UTC]

A very beautiful drawing. You caught her very well

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to ArminiusWillabert [2012-05-22 05:24:39 +0000 UTC]

Ans a very kind of you. Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SakurionRiel [2012-05-21 14:55:24 +0000 UTC]

Recognized her instantly Really looks liker her, great job!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to SakurionRiel [2012-05-22 05:26:06 +0000 UTC]

There's only one Zooey with her lovely eyes, hair and smile.
Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

SofTabak [2012-05-21 13:17:11 +0000 UTC]

Very well done

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to SofTabak [2012-05-21 13:31:15 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

phoenix132 [2012-05-21 09:57:09 +0000 UTC]

Excellent work, it looks just like her

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to phoenix132 [2012-05-21 13:31:05 +0000 UTC]

I appreciate it, thanks

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

Rohit-Choudhary [2012-05-21 07:03:11 +0000 UTC]

Beautiful work.. well done..

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to Rohit-Choudhary [2012-05-21 13:30:45 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

Rohit-Choudhary In reply to FrankGo [2012-05-28 07:52:05 +0000 UTC]

👍: 0 ⏩: 0

kelsanity [2012-05-20 23:56:25 +0000 UTC]

So awesome~!

👍: 0 ⏩: 1

FrankGo In reply to kelsanity [2012-05-21 04:41:55 +0000 UTC]

Thank you

👍: 0 ⏩: 0