HOME | DD

Froexd — Yugioh Feb, 2023 banlist reaction (limited cards)

Published: 2023-02-08 05:28:47 +0000 UTC; Views: 939; Favourites: 2; Downloads: 0
Redirect to original
Description Okay now the limited is somewhat of a surprise to see. Cause Konami really had some hits and brought back no one thought of.

Ishizu retrains.
I’m not going to say their names one at a time. Mostly because of how long their names are, but they all have powerful GY effects once sent there. Of course because of the “Ishizu Tear” decks running around at local’s. Not to mention other milling decks light “Lightsworn” or it’s twilight variant. So glad no more long B.S. combos.

Tearlament Havnis, Merrli, and SCHEIREN.
okay I think Konami has heard many complaints about these decks at locals. A lot worse than “Branded Despia” or any other decks that’s been running around lately with the “Bystal” cards too. But they just made this deck completely unplayable by itself with banning their main fusion monsters and limiting these 3 cards. Sure they could still be used as an engine with “Invoked” and “Shadoll” using their fusion plays a bit, but other than that this deck went from tier zero to just trash now. Not that it was going to last because of the new “Kashira” cards released as the new tier zero.

Ancient Fairy Dragon.
wow… I never thought this card would ever get unbanned after how broken field spells have become lately and “Mystic Mine” when it was still legal. Now we can actually play all 6 signer dragons and go all 5Ds on this one. I’m talking about “Stardust Dragon”, “Red Dragon Archfiend”, “Black Rose Dragon”, “Livestream Dragon”, “Blackwing Dragon”, and now “Ancient Fairy Dragon” is back. Other than the nostalgia from the anime. I can see a few decks that might use it, but not a lot since there aren’t many field spell reliant decks like say “Zombie World” or “Lair of Darkness”. But okay I guess since it is getting an errata next month.
==========
next will be what has been taken off since nothing has been semi limited.
Related content
Comments: 0